UNITED STATES

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  þ                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

  Filed by the Registrant  Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

¨

Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)14A-6(E)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨Soliciting Material Pursuant tounder §240.14a-12

LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

(Name of Registrant as Specified Inin Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
þNo fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 
1)


Dear Fellow Shareholders

April 8, 2024

On behalf of the Board of Directors of LyondellBasell Industries N.V. (“LYB” or the “Company”), we are pleased to present our 2024 proxy statement.

DELIVERING STRONG FINANCIAL RESULTS

In 2023, LYB delivered resilient financial results amid challenging market conditions. We generated $4.9 billion in cash from operating activities and returned $1.8 billion to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, extending our track record of outstanding cash generation and strong returns.

IMPLEMENTING OUR NEW STRATEGY TO GROW SUSTAINABLE VALUE

Last year, we launched our three-pillar strategy to create a more profitable and sustainable growth engine for LYB. Our strategy focuses on three key initiatives: 

Growing and upgrading the core;

Building a profitable Circular and Low Carbon Solutions (“CLCS”) business; and

Stepping up performance and culture. 

One year after launch, we are making significant progress on each pillar. In March 2023, we successfully started up the world’s largest propylene oxide (PO) and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) unit in Texas, which enables us to meet the growing demand for essential products. In early 2024 we entered into an agreement for a new propylene and polypropylene joint venture in Saudi Arabia. This year, we will continue to focus on efficiently growing and upgrading our core and expect to close the sale of our ethylene oxide and derivatives business. Following our final investment decision in 2023, we will also move forward on engineering and construction of our first advanced recycling plant using LYB’s proprietary MoReTec technology. 

Throughout the year, our CLCS business built strong foundations to secure feedstock supply, expand our recycling footprint, and develop scalable recycling technologies to support the reduction of plastic waste in the environment. In addition, we formed joint ventures to build plastics recycling infrastructure in Europe, Asia, and North America. We also achieved nearly 90% of our goal to procure half of our electricity from renewable sources and issued our inaugural green bond to help advance LYB’s long-term sustainability goals.

We are stepping up performance and culture with our Value Enhancement Program (VEP), which helped us double our original target for recurring annual EBITDA in 2023. Our new brand identity, revealed in October 2023, visually expresses our commitment and alignment to our strategy and purpose.

Amid these big changes, we remain committed to our GoalZERO safety culture. In 2023, we extended our industry-leading safety record with a total recordable incident rate of 0.139 and a process safety incident rate of 0.035. We are proud that 60 of our manufacturing sites achieved GoalZERO, and 67 manufacturing sites were injury-free.

ELECTING A DIVERSE AND QUALIFIED BOARD

The Board is pleased to introduce our new director nominee, Bridget Karlin, the Senior Vice President of Information Technology, Services & Operations, at Kaiser Permanente, one of the largest not-for-profit health care systems in the U.S. Ms. Karlin brings over 30 years of experience in enterprise-wide digital technology to our Board. If each of our nominees is elected, four of our twelve directors will be women and fifty percent of our Board will be gender, ethnically, or racially diverse.

SHAREHOLDER VOTING

Your vote is important, and we encourage you to cast your vote as soon as possible to ensure your shares are represented at the meeting. Thank you for your investment in LYB.

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

$4.9B

 

CASH FROM
OPERATING 
ACTIVITIES

$1.8B

RETURNED TO 
SHAREHOLDERS

 

JACQUES AIGRAIN
Chair of the Board
PETER VANACKER
CEO
 2)
 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell3

About LyondellBasell

We are LyondellBasell – a leader in the global chemical industry creating solutions for everyday sustainable living. Through advanced technology and focused investments, we are enabling a circular and low carbon economy.

Across all we do, we aim to unlock value for our customers, investors and society. As one of the world’s largest producers of polymers and a leader in polyolefin technologies, we develop, manufacture and market high-quality and innovative products for applications ranging from sustainable transportation and food safety to clean water and quality healthcare.
 

Our Purpose

Creating solutions for everyday sustainable living

Our Values

Aggregate number

Our values provide grounding in behaviors that ensure our team is achieving company objectives through a shared, unifying culture of securities to which transaction applies:commitment and purpose.

 

We champion people
We put people at the heart of everything we do by embracing a diverse, equitable, and inclusive culture, adopting a customer-centric lens, and being safety-minded.

We strive for excellence
We relentlessly raise the bar by feeling empowered to take ownership, promoting collaborative ways of working, and being passionate about our impact on the world.

We shape the future
We remain on the cutting-edge by initiating environmentally conscious decisions, spurring creative solutions, and cultivating a pioneering mindset.

 3)

Our Commitments

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant

We’re committed to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forthdelivering unique products and services in the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):following ways:

 

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:Sustainability-focused innovation
We redefine our industry by developing circular and low carbon products and technologies at scale and championing chemistry as a sustainable solution for our planet.

 

5)

Total fee paid:Outside-in perspective
We develop a deep understanding of emerging trends, end-markets, and consumer needs to stay one step ahead, create meaningful value, and lead our customers forward.

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Ever-better performance
As an inventor and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Scheduleleader in chemistry, we apply our combined expertise to elevate our performance and the date of its filing.
1)

Amount Previously Paid:develop extraordinary, high-quality products.

 

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)

Filing Party:

4)

Date Filed:

Impactful collaboration
We foster relationships across the entire value chain to successfully solve global challenges, create better outcomes, and amplify our impact on the communities we serve.

 


LOGO

NOTICE OF AND AGENDA FOR

2016 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

2023 Company Snapshot

 

Time and Place: 11:

100+

countries where our
products are sold

20

countries with manufacturing
sites and joint ventures

~6,200

patents and patent
applications worldwide

~20,300

employees globally

#1

largest producer of
polyethylene (PE) and
polypropylene (PP) in Europe

#1

largest producer of 
oxyfuels worldwide

#2

largest producer of
PP worldwide

#2

largest producer of
propylene oxide (PO)
worldwide

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell4

Notice of and Agenda for 2024 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

MEETING INFORMATION
FRIDAY, MAY 24, 2024
8:00 a.m. (CET) on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at the Sheraton Hotel, Local Time
SHERATON HOTEL
Schiphol Airport, located at Schiphol Blvd. 101
1118 BG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Items of Business:

 

•      DiscussionITEMS OF BUSINESS

1. Elect our Board of Directors;
2.Discharge our corporate governance, our dividend policy and the compensation of our Management Board;

•      Election of Jacques Aigrain, Lincoln Benet, Bruce Smith and Nance Dicciani as members of the Supervisory Board for terms to expire in 2019;

•      Election of Thomas Aebischer, Dan Coombs and Jim Guilfoyle as members of the Management Board with terms to expire in 2018;

•      Adoption of our Dutch statutory annual accounts for the year ended December 31, 2015;

•      Discharge of the members of our Management Board and Supervisory Boarddirectors from liability in respect ofconnection with the exercise of their duties during 2023;

3.Adopt our 2023 Dutch statutory annual accounts;
4.Appoint the year ended December 31, 2015;

•      Ratificationexternal auditor for our 2024 Dutch statutory annual accounts;

5.Ratify the appointment of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our U.S. GAAP financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016 and appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. to audit our Dutch statutory annual accounts for the year ending December 31, 2016;

•      Approval of the interim dividends we declared and paid in respect of the 2015 fiscal year;

•      Approval offirm;

6.Provide an advisory vote on our executive compensation;

•      Approval of repurchasescompensation (say-on-pay);

7.Authorize the repurchase of up to 10% of our outstanding shares;issued share capital; and

•      Any other matters properly brought before

8.Approve the meeting.

cancellation of all or a portion of the shares held in our treasury account.

 

We will also discuss our corporate governance, dividend policy, and executive compensation program.

By order of the Board,

CHARITY R. KOHL
Corporate Secretary 
April 8, 2024

Who Can Vote:HOW TO VOTE

Your vote is important. You canare eligible to vote if you are a shareholder of record asat the close of business on April 13, 201626, 2024.

ONLINE
Visit the website
on your proxy card
BY MOBILE DEVICE
Scan this QR code to vote with
your mobile device
BY PHONE
Call the telephone number on
your proxy card
BY MAIL
Sign, date and return your
proxy card in the
enclosed envelope
IN PERSON
Attend the annual meeting in
person. See page 93

Voting by Proxy:

YouIf you are a registered shareholder, you may submit your proxy over the internet;vote online at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone, or by mail.mailing a proxy card. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker, or other institution, you may vote your shares through the method specified on the voting instruction form provided to you. You may revoke youralso attend the annual general meeting in person. If you intend to attend the meeting, notice must be given to the Company on or before May 17, 2024. See page  93 for more information.

Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2024 Annual General Meeting

This proxy statement and our 2023 annual report to shareholders are available on our website at any time before the votewww.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Investors,” then “Company Reports.” This proxy statement is taken by following the instructionsfirst being mailed and delivered electronically to shareholders on or about April 8, 2024. If you wish to receive future proxy statements and annual reports electronically rather than receiving paper copies in the proxy statement.mail, please see page 94 for instructions. This approach can provide information to you more conveniently, while reducing the environmental impact of our annual general meeting and helping to reduce our distribution costs.

 

 LOGO
Amanda K. Maki
March 25, 2016Secretary to the Supervisory Board


Table of Contents

Page 

About the Annual Meeting

2024Proxy Statement   
   LyondellBasell51
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Supervisory BoardProxy Statement Summary7
Item 1. Election of Directors

410

Corporate Governance Matters and Communications with the Supervisory Board

419

Board Leadership StructureDirector Compensation

538

Role in Risk Oversight Item 2. Discharge of Directors from Liability

540

Independence of Supervisory Board Members

6

Meetings and Board Committees

8

Audit Committee Report

8

Compensation Committee Report

10

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

10

Dutch Corporate Governance Code

12

Related Party Transactions

14

Compensation of the Members of the Supervisory Board

14

Election of Supervisory Board Directors (Item 1 on the Proxy Card)

16

Supervisory Directors Not Standing for Election

18

Information about the Management Board

20

Election of Managing Directors (Item 2 on the Proxy Card)

21

Security Ownership of Management

24

Persons Owning More than 5% of LyondellBasell Shares

25

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

25

Executive Compensation

26

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

27

Item 3. Adoption of Dutch Statutory Annual Accounts for 2015 (Item 3 on the Proxy Card)

6040

Discharge from Liability Item 4. Appointment of MembersPricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. As The Auditor of the Management Board (Item 4 on the Proxy Card)our Dutch Statutory Annual Accounts

6041

Discharge from Liability of Members of the Supervisory Board (Item 5 on the Proxy Card)

60

Item 5. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as theour Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Item 6

41
Item 6. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-On-Pay)44
Compensation Discussion and Analysis46
Compensation Committee Report64
Compensation Tables65
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control74
Equity Compensation Plan Information78
CEO Pay Ratio79
Pay Versus Performance80
Item 7. Authorization to Conduct Share Repurchases84
Item 8. Cancellation of Shares85
Securities Ownership86
Questions and Answers about the Annual General Meeting90
Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures95

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 

The statements in this proxy statement relating to matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions of management of LYB which are believed to be reasonable at the time made and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. When used in this proxy statement, the words “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Actual results could differ materially based on factors including, but not limited to, our ability to attract and retain a highly skilled and diverse workforce; actions taken by customers, suppliers, regulators, and others in response to increasing concerns about the environmental impact of plastic in the environment or other general sustainability initiatives; our ability to meet our sustainability goals, including the ability to operate safely, increase production of recycled and renewable-based polymers to meet our targets and forecasts, and reduce our emissions and achieve net zero emissions by the time set in our goals; our ability to procure energy from renewable sources; our ability to build a profitable Circular and Low Carbon Solutions business; our ability to successfully implement initiatives identified pursuant to our Value Enhancement Program and generate anticipated earnings; water scarcity and quality; the pace of climate change and legal or regulatory responses thereto; and technological developments, and our ability to develop new products and process technologies. Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found in the “Risk Factors” sections of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, which can be found at www.LyondellBasell.com on the Investor Relations page and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. There is no assurance that any of the actions, events or results of the forward-looking statements will occur, or if any of them do, what impact they will have on our results of operations or financial condition. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made and are based on the estimates and opinions of management of LYB at the time the statements are made. LYB does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements should circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions change, except as required by law.

References to our website in this proxy statement are provided as a convenience, and the information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be a part of this proxy statement or incorporated into any other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2024Proxy Card)Statement      LyondellBasell6
Back to Contents

Proxy Statement Summary

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. The summary does not include all of the information you should consider before voting your shares, and we encourage you to read the full proxy statement carefully.

Annual General Meeting

Date and Time

Friday, May 24, 2024,
8:00 a.m. Local Time

Place

Sheraton Hotel, Schiphol Airport 
Schiphol Blvd. 101
1118 BG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Record Date

Friday, April 26, 2024

Agenda and Voting Recommendations

Item Board Recommendation Page 
1Election of 12 directors FOR all nominees 10 
2Discharge of directors from liability FOR 40 
3Adoption of Dutch statutory annual accounts FOR 40 
4Appointment of auditor of Dutch statutory annual accounts FOR 41 
5Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm FOR 41 
6Advisory vote on executive compensation (say-on-pay) FOR 44 
7Authorization to conduct share repurchases FOR 84 
8Cancellation of shares FOR 85 

Corporate Governance Highlights

Annual election of directorsBoard diversity (4 female director nominees and 2 ethnically/racially diverse director nominees)
Independent Board (11 of 12 director nominees)Code of Conduct supported by whistleblower helpline and robust compliance program
Independent Committees (100% of directors on each Board Committee are independent)Board engagement on strategy, long range planning, and capital allocation
Independent Board ChairBoard oversight of enterprise risk management and sustainability strategy
Executive sessions at each regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetingRegular succession planning for directors and executive management with focus on talent development
Annual self-assessments for the Board and each CommitteeHigh director attendance and engagement, with average meeting attendance of 97% in 2023
Board refreshment supported by mandatory retirement age and annual Board self-assessmentsStock ownership guidelines for directors and executives and policy against hedging and pledging the Company’s shares

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell7
Back to Contents

2024 Director Nominees

All Committee memberships shown in the table below will be effective following the 2024 annual general meeting, including Ms. Karlin’s Committee memberships. For more information about our 2023 Committee membership, see “Board and Committee Information” on page 33.

NomineeAgeYears of
Service
Independent Committee Memberships Other
Public
Boards
AuditC&TDNomGovHSE&SFinance
Jacques Aigrain6913YES    2
Lincoln Benet609YES     1
Robin Buchanan7213YES     0
Anthony (Tony) Chase693YES     3
Robert (Bob) Dudley683YES     1
Claire Farley6510YES     2
Rita Griffin611YES     0
Michael (Mike) Hanley586YES     1
Virginia (Ginny) Kamsky702YES     1
Bridget Karlin67NomineeYES     1
Albert Manifold615YES     1
Peter Vanacker582CEO       1
  Chair  Member            

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell8
Back to Contents

2023 Performance Overview

In 2023, LYB delivered resilient results and outstanding cash conversion. Despite economic uncertainty and pressure from new industry capacity and softer global demand, our businesses efficiently generated cash from a diverse business portfolio. We remain committed to a disciplined approach to capital allocation while advancing long-term strategies that capture value and accelerate sustainable growth.

$2.1B$5.2B$1.8B
Net IncomeEBITDA 
Ex. Identified Items*
Returned To Shareholders

*See Appendix A for information about our non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA, including and excluding identified items. Identified items include adjustments for impairments and refinery exit costs.

CASH
GENERATION
Achieved robust cash generation driven by diverse business portfolioSTRONG
BALANCE SHEET
Maintained a strong, investment-grade balance sheet and ample liquidity
SAFETYContinued to focus on safe operations and emphasize our GoalZERO programSHAREHOLDER
RETURNS
Delivered 13th consecutive year of regular dividend growth
COST 
DISCIPLINE
Committed to balanced and disciplined capital allocation to enhance value and growthSUSTAINABILITYEstablished our Green Financing Framework and issued inaugural green bond

2023 Executive Compensation Highlights

We are committed to a pay for performance philosophy, and our compensation programs align executive and shareholder interests by tying a significant amount of compensation to our financial, business, and strategic goals. Our Compensation and Talent Development (“C&TD”) Committee continually monitors compensation best practices, the effectiveness of our compensation programs, and their alignment with our compensation philosophy. In 2023, challenging market conditions impacted EBITDA, but our strong performance on the environmental, social and governance (ESG) metrics and achievement of milestones under our Value Enhancement Program resulted in annual bonuses paying slightly above target. Our performance share units (“PSUs”) granted in 2021 under our long-term incentive program, with a three-year performance period ended December 31, 2023, earned 200% of target, reflecting the fact that our total shareholder returns (“TSR”) fell in the top quartile of selected peers and our and free cash flow (“FCF”) per share exceeded targets set by our C&TD Committee. For more information on our annual bonus performance metrics, see “2023 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail” on page 53.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell9
Back to Contents

Item 1
Election of Directors

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees to our Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors of LYB recommends that each of the twelve director nominees introduced below be elected to our Board, in each case for a term ending at our 2025 annual general meeting of shareholders. The nominees include eleven current directors, who were elected by shareholders at the 2023 annual general meeting, and new director candidate Bridget Karlin.

Our Board

Our goal is to have a Board that provides effective oversight of the Company through the appropriate balance of experience, expertise, skills, competencies, specialized knowledge, and other qualifications and attributes. Director candidates also must be willing and able to devote the time and attention necessary to engage in relevant, informed discussion and decision-making. Our Nominating and Governance Committee focuses on Board succession planning and refreshment and is responsible for recruiting and recommending nominees to the full Board for election. The Committee considers the qualifications, contributions, and outside commitments of each current director, as well as the results of annual Board self-assessments and management assessments, in determining whether he or she should be nominated for reelection. Many of our directors serve on the boards and board committees of other companies, and the Committee believes this service provides additional experience and knowledge that improve the functioning of our own Board. Our Board Profile, which is available on our website, provides general principles for the composition, expertise, background, diversity and independence of the Board and guides our Nominating and Governance Committee on the nomination and appointment of directors. 

Our Board considers diversity a priority and seeks representation across a range of attributes, including race, gender, ethnicity, and nationality. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Committee and any outside search firms engaged to assist in identifying potential director candidates include women and candidates from underrepresented populations in each pool from which a director candidate is selected. These recruitment efforts are evidenced by our current Board composition and the qualities and qualifications of our nominees. If each of our twelve director nominees for 2024 is elected, we will meet our goal of appointing at least one-third female directors. 

Director Nominees’ Independence, Tenure, Diversity, and Experience

Our director nominees provide the Board with a broad range of perspectives due to their diverse gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, age, and tenure profiles, as well as the qualifications and skills identified below. Each of the eleven non-executive directors nominated to our Board is independent, and 50% of our director nominees are gender, ethnically or racially diverse. This section provides information on our director nominees for the 2024 annual general meeting. For more information about our current Board as of the date of this proxy statement, see “Board and Committee Information” on page 33.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell10
Back to Contents
DIRECTOR EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE

INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE

Experience with and understanding of the chemicals and refining industries

  61 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee InformationHSE EXPERIENCE

Experience with social responsibility issues related to health, safety, and the environment

  61 

AppointmentCORPORATE STRATEGY

Corporate strategy and strategic planning experience

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

Experience with mergers, acquisitions, and other strategic transactions

CORPORATE FINANCE

Financial expertise and experience with corporate finance

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT / CEO EXPERIENCE

Executive management experience with large or international organizations

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 

Knowledge of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. as the Auditor for the Dutch Statutory Annual Accounts (Item 7corporate governance issues applicable to companies listed on the Proxy Card)NYSE

RISK MANAGEMENT

Experience identifying, managing, and mitigating key enterprise risks

PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTOR

Service on the boards of other public companies

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Experience and expertise related to human resources, talent, diversity, and culture

  62 

RatificationINFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SECURITY 

Experience with cybersecurity systems and Approvalprocesses that protect the storage of Dividend in Respect of the 2015 Fiscal Year (Item 8 on the Proxy Card) and Discussion of Dividend Policyinformation

  62 

Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote Approving Executive Compensation (Item 9 on the Proxy Card)TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION 

Experience with technology-related business or emerging technology trends

  63

PUBLIC POLICY AND COMPLIANCE 

Government relations, legal, regulatory compliance and/or public policy experience

DIVERSITY AND DEMOGRAPHICS
Race/Ethnicity
African American or Black
Alaskan Native or American Indian
Asian
Caucasian or White
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Gender
Male
Female

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell11
Back to Contents

Director Nominations

The Board is responsible for nominating candidates for Board membership, and our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for recommending director candidates to the Board. Potential candidates may also be recommended to the Nominating and Governance Committee for consideration by other directors, management, and our shareholders. From time to time, the Committee works with outside search firms to assist with identifying and evaluating director candidates.

A shareholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate should submit a written recommendation to our Corporate Secretary by email or regular mail. The recommendation must include the name of the nominated individual, relevant biographical information, and the individual’s consent to be nominated and to serve if elected. The Corporate Secretary may request additional information to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee in its evaluation. Our Nominating and Governance Committee uses the same process to evaluate shareholder nominees as it does in evaluating nominees identified by other sources. For our 2025 annual general meeting of shareholders, recommendations must be received by December 9, 2024 to be considered.

BY EMAIL

send an email to
CorporateSecretary@LyondellBasell.com

BY MAIL

LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
c/o Corporate Secretary
4th Floor, One Vine Street
London W1J 0AH, United Kingdom

2024 Nominees to the Board

On the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board has nominated each of the eleven directors elected by shareholders at our 2023 annual general meeting and one new director nominee, Bridget Karlin. In evaluating these nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee considered the Board’s 2023 director self-assessments and management evaluations, as well as each nominee’s background and skill set. These twelve individuals have a diverse array of expertise, experience, and leadership skills that support the Company’s strategy evolution. Each nominee has consented to serve as a director if elected. 

We introduce our twelve nominees below. All Committee memberships shown in this section will be effective following the 2024 annual general meeting. For more information about our current Board and Committee membership as of the date of this proxy statement, see “Board and Committee Information” on page 33.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell12
Back to Contents

Jacques Aigrain, 69

French-Swiss

Non-Executive Director since 2011;
Chair since 2018

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  Audit Committee

  Nominating and Governance Committee

  Finance Committee


Biography

Mr. Aigrain is our Chair of the Board and a retired Senior Advisor and Partner of Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm. Prior to joining Warburg Pincus in 2013, Mr. Aigrain spent nine years at SwissRe AG, a publicly traded insurance company, including as Chief Executive Officer, and 20 years in global leadership roles at J.P. Morgan in New York, London and Paris. He also has many years of experience as a director of public and multinational organizations, including The London Stock Exchange Group plc, WPP plc, a multinational advertising and public relations company, and currently, Clearwater Analytics Holdings Inc., a maker of financial software products, and TradeWeb Markets Inc., an international financial services company. He holds a doctorate in economics from Université Paris-Sorbonne and a master’s in economics from Université Paris Dauphine – PSL. Mr. Aigrain’s more than 30 years of financial services and management background, including extensive executive and board experience, provide him with expertise in strategy development and implementation, mergers and acquisitions, finance, and capital markets. Additionally, he brings substantial knowledge of board and governance matters to the Board.

Skills And Qualifications

  Corporate Finance

  Risk Management

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  International Operations

  Corporate Governance

  Corporate Strategy

  Capital Markets

  CEO Experience

  Public Company Director

  Public Policy and Compliance

Other Current Public Directorships

  Clearwater Analytics Holdings Inc. (since 2021)

  TradeWeb Markets Inc. (since 2022)

Former Public Directorships

  The London Stock Exchange Group plc (2013-2022)

  WPP plc (2013-2022)


Lincoln Benet, 60

American-British

Non-Executive Director since 2015

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  Nominating and Governance Committee 

  Finance Committee (Chair)


Biography

Mr. Benet has served as Chief Executive Officer of Access Industries, a privately held industrial group with world-wide holdings, since 2006. Prior to joining Access, he spent 17 years at Morgan Stanley, including as Managing Director. Mr. Benet also has experience serving on the boards of several privately held and publicly traded companies, including those in the investment, music and publishing, oil and gas pipes and tubing, cement, sports media, and petrochemicals industries. As a result of this background, he brings to our Board a working knowledge of global markets, mergers and acquisitions, executive management, strategic planning, and corporate strategy, as well as extensive experience with international finance and corporate finance matters, including treasury, insurance, and tax. Mr. Benet received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and his B.A. in Economics from Yale University. Mr. Benet possesses significant experience advising and managing publicly traded and privately held enterprises and brings substantial knowledge of corporate finance and strategic business planning activities to the Board.

Skills And Qualifications

  Corporate Strategy

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  International Operations

  Human Capital Management

  Corporate Governance

  Corporate Finance

  Risk Management

  Technology and Innovation

  Capital Markets

  CEO Experience 

  Public Company Director

  Public Policy and Compliance

Other Current Public Directorships

  Warner Music Group Corp. (since 2011; public since 2020)

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell13
Back to Contents

Robin Buchanan, 72

British

Non-Executive Director since 2011

INDEPENDENT

Committees

  Health, Safety, Environmental, and Sustainability (“HSE&S”) Committee

  Nominating and Governance Committee


Biography

Mr. Buchanan has previously served as Dean and President of London Business School, the Chairman of PageGroup plc, a global specialist recruitment company, a director of Schroders plc, a global asset management firm, a director of Cicap Ltd, a global private equity firm, and a director of Bain & Company Inc., a global business consulting firm. As the former Managing Partner of Bain in the UK and Senior Partner for the UK and South Africa, he continues to serve in an advisory role to Bain. Until August 2023, Mr. Buchanan also served as an advisor to Access Industries and Non-Executive Chairman of its Advisory Board. Mr. Buchanan’s experience as a board member of publicly traded, private, and charitable companies, Dean of a leading Business School, and long tenure with Bain provide him with deep experience in strategy, leadership, board effectiveness, business development, and acquisitions across most industry sectors, including considerable involvement with chemicals and energy in Europe. He also brings a wealth of experience in board and governance matters, particularly as related to multi-national companies. Mr. Buchanan is a Chartered Accountant and a published author on strategy, acquisitions, leadership, board effectiveness, corporate governance, and compensation. Mr. Buchanan received his FCA from the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales and his M.B.A. with High Distinction from Harvard Business School.

Skills And Qualifications

  Industry Experience

  Corporate Strategy

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  Corporate Finance

  Corporate Accounting

  International Operations 

  Leadership Development

  Executive Management

  Risk Management

  Corporate Governance

  Public Company Director 

  Human Capital Management

  Technology and Innovation

  Public Policy and Compliance

Former Public Directorships 

  Schroders plc (2010-2019)

Anthony (Tony) Chase, 69

American

Non-Executive Director since 2021

INDEPENDENT

Committees

  Audit Committee

  C&TD Committee


Biography

Mr. Chase is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ChaseSource, L.P., a staffing, facilities management, and real estate development firm founded by him in 2006 and recognized as one of the nation’s largest minority-owned businesses by Black Enterprise Magazine. Prior to ChaseSource, Mr. Chase founded and sold three successful ventures: Chase Radio Partners, Cricket Wireless and ChaseCom. He is also a principal owner of the Marriott Hotel at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston and the Principle Toyota dealership in greater Memphis. He currently serves as a director of Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc., a financial holding company, Nabors Industries, an operator of drilling rig fleets and provider of offshore platform rigs, and Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., an oil and gas exploration and production company. Mr. Chase is a Professor of Law Emeritus at the University of Houston Law Center, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and serves on the board of numerous Houston-based non-profits including the Houston Endowment, the Greater Houston Partnership, the Greater Houston Community Foundation, the M.D. Anderson Board of Visitors, and the Texas Medical Center. He previously served as Deputy Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Mr. Chase is an honors graduate of Harvard College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. He has received many awards, including the American Jewish Committee’s 2016 Human Relations Award, Houston Technology Center’s 2015 Entrepreneur of the Year, NAACP 2013 Mickey Leland Humanitarian Award, GHP 2013 Bob Onstead Leadership Award, the 2012 Whitney M. Young Jr. Service Award, Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur of the Year Award, Bank of America’s Pinnacle Award and UH Law Center’s Baker Faculty Award. 

Skills And Qualifications

  CEO Experience

  Risk Management

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  HSE Experience 

  Strategic Planning

  Corporate Governance

  Corporate Finance

  Public Company Director 

  Human Capital Management

Other Current Public Directorships

  Nabors Industries Ltd. (since 2019)

  Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. (since 2020)

  Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (since 2021)

Former Public Directorships 

  Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (2014-2019)

  Paragon Offshore plc (2014-2017)

  Heritage-Crystal Clean, Inc. (2020-2022)


2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell14
Back to Contents

Robert (Bob) Dudley, 68

American-British

Non-Executive Director since 2021

INDEPENDENT

Committees

  Finance Committee

  HSE&S Committee


Biography

Mr. Dudley is Chairman of the international industry-led Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, which aims to accelerate the oil and gas industry’s response to climate change, and Chair of the Accenture Global Energy Board. He served as the Group Chief Executive of BP plc, a global energy provider, from 2010 to 2020. He was appointed to the board of BP in 2009, and previous executive roles with BP include Alternative and Renewable Energy activities and responsibility for BP’s upstream business in Russia, the Caspian region, and Africa. Mr. Dudley is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, and received an M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois. As the former CEO of a multinational oil and gas company, he has acquired extensive executive management experience and knowledge of the energy industry, including a leadership role in advancing decarbonization plans and other key sustainability initiatives. He also serves as chairman of the board of Axio, a leading SaaS provider of cyber risk management and quantification solutions, and director of 8 Rivers Capital LLC, a private firm leading the invention and commercialization of technologies for the global energy transition. Mr. Dudley has over 40 years of experience in strategic planning, risk management (including risks related to climate change), international operations, and health, safety, environmental and operational matters. 

Skills And Qualifications 

Approval  CEO Experience

  Risk Management

  HSE Experience

  Industry Experience

  Public Company Director 

  Climate Expertise 

  Corporate Strategy

  International Operations

  Mergers & Acquisitions 

  Human Capital Management

  Corporate Governance

  Technology and Innovation

Other Current Public Directorships

  Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (since 2021)

Former Public Directorships 

  Rosneft Oil Company (2013-2022)

  BP plc (2009-2020)


Claire Farley, 65

American

Non-Executive Director since 2014

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  Audit Committee

  Nominating and Governance Committee (Chair)


Biography

Ms. Farley was a partner at KKR Management, LLC, a global investment firm, from 2013 until her retirement in 2016, and subsequently served as Vice Chair of the AuthorityEnergy business from 2016 to 2017 and Senior Advisor from 2017 to 2022. Prior to joining KKR, Ms. Farley co-founded RPM Energy, a privately-owned oil and natural gas exploration and development company. Before that, she served as Chief Executive Officer of Randall & Dewey, an oil and gas asset transaction advisory firm, from 2002 to 2005, when Randall & Dewey became the oil and gas investment banking group of Jeffries & Company, where she served as Co-President and Senior Advisor from 2005 to 2008. Previously, she served as chief executive officer of Intelligent Diagnostics Corp. from 1999 to 2001, and of Trade-Ranger Inc. from 2001 to 2002. Her oil and gas exploration experience includes positions at Texaco from 1981 to 1999, including as president of worldwide exploration and new ventures, as president of North American production, and as chief executive officer of Hydro-Texaco Inc. Ms. Farley earned a bachelor’s degree from Emory University. She brings to the Board experience in business development, finance, mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, as well as knowledge of the Management Board, with Supervisory Board approval,chemical industry’s feedstocks and their markets. She also has experience in all matters of executive management and a deep understanding of public company and governance matters due to Repurchase up to 10% of our Outstanding Shares Until November 11, 2017 (Item 10her current and prior service on the Proxy Card)boards of companies including Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Crescent Energy Company, and TechnipFMC. 

Skills And Qualifications  64

  CEO Experience

  Corporate Strategy

  Risk Management

  Human Capital Management

  Public Company Director 

  Capital Markets

  Corporate Governance

  Corporate Finance

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  International Operations

 

Other Current Public Directorships

  TechnipFMC plc (since 2017)

  Crescent Energy Company (since 2021)

Former Public Directorships 

  Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (2017-2019)


2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell15
Equity Compensation Plan InformationBack to Contents

Rita Griffin, 61

American

Non-Executive Director since 2023

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  C&TD Committee

  HSE&S Committee (Chair)


Biography

Ms. Griffin served as the Chief Operating Officer of Global Petrochemicals at BP plc, one of three main divisions of BP’s downstream business, from 2015 to 2020. Previously, she served in a number of leadership positions within BP plc’s manufacturing, logistics, retail and functional organizations. Ms. Griffin began her career at Amoco and Standard Oil (Indiana), which was acquired by BP plc in 1998. She is a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Managerial Accountant, and received her master of management from Northwestern University and bachelor of business administration in accounting from Northern Illinois University. With over 30 years of experience in global oil and gas and chemicals businesses, Ms. Griffin has considerable experience in developing and implementing strategies and leading substantial transformation programs. She has previously served on the board of directors of Royal Mail Group PLC, an international postal service and courier company, where she provided oversight for environment strategy and implementation, health, safety and security, ethics and compliance, culture and employee engagement, diversity and inclusion, governance and community stakeholder engagement, and customer satisfaction.

Skills And Qualifications  65

  Industry Experience

  HSE Experience

  Capital Project Execution

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  Public Company Director 

  International Operations

  Corporate Strategy

  Risk Management

  Executive Management

  Corporate Finance

  Corporate Governance

  Human Capital Management

Former Public Directorships 

  Royal Mail Group PLC (2016-2022)

 

Michael (Mike) Hanley, 58

Canadian

Non-Executive Director since 2018

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  Audit Committee (Chair)

  Finance Committee


Biography

Mr. Hanley has more than 30 years of experience in senior management and finance roles, including as Chief Financial Officer of Alcan, a Canadian mining company and aluminum manufacturer, President and CEO of Alcan’s Global Bauxite and Alumina business group, and Senior Vice President, Operations & Strategy of the National Bank of Canada. He brings strong financial and operational experience, deep knowledge of capital-intensive and process industries, experience with U.S. and international accounting standards, and a broad understanding of international markets. Mr. Hanley also has significant experience on public company boards, including in the roles of lead director, chair of the board, and audit committee chair, and has an appreciation for corporate governance matters and the board’s role in financial oversight. He currently serves as chair of the board of EQB Inc., which provides personal and commercial banking services, and previously served as lead director and audit committee chair of Nuvei Corporation and BRP Inc. He is also a member of the Quebec Order of Chartered Professional Accountants. Mr. Hanley received his bachelor of business administration from HEC Montreal.

Skills And Qualifications

  Corporate Finance

  Corporate Strategy

  Risk Management

  International Operations

  Public Company Director

  Corporate Accounting

  Capital Markets

  HSE Experience

  Mergers and Acquisitions

  Executive Management

  Corporate Governance

  Human Capital Management

  Technology and Innovation

  Public Policy and Compliance

Other Current Public Directorships

  EQB Inc. (since 2022)

Former Public Directorships 

  Nuvei Corporation (2020-2023)

  BRP, Inc. (2012-2022)

  Shawcor Ltd. (2015-2021)

  Industrial Alliance Insurance & Financial Services (2015-2019)

  Groupe Jean Coutu (PJC), Inc. (2016-2018)


2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell16
Back to Contents

Virginia Kamsky, 70

American

Non-Executive Director since 2022

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  C&TD Committee 

  HSE&S Committee


Biography

Ms. Kamsky is the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Kamsky Associates, Inc., a firm she founded in 1980 and the first U.S. advisory firm approved to provide strategic advisory services in China. Ms. Kamsky began her career at Chase Manhattan Bank (now JPMorgan Chase Bank) and served in various capacities of increasing seniority, including as Second Vice President of Chase and head of Chase’s Corporate China Division. She has also served as a member of the US Secretary of the Navy Advisory Panel from 2009 to 2017 and as Chairman and CEO of China Institute in America from 2003 to 2013. She has been awarded the Navy Distinguished Civilian Service Award, the highest honorary award the Secretary of the Navy can confer on a civilian employee, selected as one of America’s 25 Top Asia Hands by Newsweek Magazine, and recognized as an Outstanding Public Company Director by the Financial Times. Ms. Kamsky received a B.A. from Princeton University. She brings to the Board a strong background in strategy and deep knowledge of the Asia-Pacific market. She also has extensive public company board experience, including at W.R. Grace & Co., Sealed Air Corporation, Olin Corporation, Tecumseh Products Company, Foamex International, Tate & Lyle PLC, Shorewood Packaging, Spectrum Brands, Kadem Sustainable Impact Corp. and, currently, at Dana Incorporated.

Skills And Qualifications

  CEO Experience

  Corporate Strategy

  Risk Management

  Industry Experience

  Information Systems and Security

  Public Company Director 

  Capital Markets

  HSE Experience

  Corporate Finance

  Technology and Innovation

  Corporate Governance

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  International Operations

  Human Capital Management

  Public Policy and Compliance

Other Current Public Directorships

  Dana Incorporated (since 2011)

Former Public Directorships 

  Kadem Sustainable Impact Corp. (2021-2023)


Bridget Karlin, 67

American

Non-Executive Director Nominee

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  Audit Committee

  Nominating and Governance Committee


Biography

Ms. Karlin is the senior vice president of information technology for Kaiser Permanente, one of the nation’s largest not-for-profit health care systems, where she is responsible for the information technology, services and operations that power Kaiser Permanente’s business. Previously, she served as the global chief technology officer and vice president of IBM’s multi-billion-dollar Global Technology Services business from 2017 to 2021. Before joining IBM, she held senior leadership roles at Intel Corporation, as general manager of its Internet of Things division, and prior to that, as general manager of Intel’s Hybrid Cloud business. Additionally, she has served in executive positions at Union Bank, as managing director at Redleaf Venture Capital, and was president and co-founder of Thinque Systems, a pioneer in mobile software deployed in 43 countries. Ms. Karlin has extensive experience leading the strategy, development, and services for a hybrid, multi-cloud enterprise IT environment, leveraging artificial intelligence, automation, security, cloud, and open-source technologies to strengthen resiliency and ensure compliance, and modernizing offerings and capabilities across applications and infrastructure environments. With a career in the technology industry that spans over 30 years, including several executive positions at large international companies, she has considerable experience in advanced technology and enterprise-wide digital transformation. She currently serves on the Executive Board of the Consumer Technology Association, a non-profit organization that represents the U.S. consumer technology industry. Ms. Karlin is a graduate of the University of California and the Harvard Business School Executive Leadership Program, and is a recipient of the 2023 Digital Innovator Award, 2021 Technology Hall of Fame, the 2019 National Technology Humanitarian Award, the 2019 Women in Consumer Technology Legacy Award, the Industrial IoT 5G Innovators Award, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, and the Bell Labs Technology Innovator Award.

Skills And Qualifications

  Information Systems and Security

  Technology and Innovation

  Corporate Strategy

  Corporate Governance

  Risk Management

  Public Company Director

  HSES Experience

  Human Capital Management

  Executive Management

Other Current Public Directorships

  Dana Incorporated (since 2019)

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell17
Back to Contents

Albert Manifold, 61

Irish

Non-Executive Director since 2019

INDEPENDENT

Committees 

  C&TD Committee (Chair)

  HSE&S Committee


Biography

Mr. Manifold has been the Group Chief Executive and a director of CRH plc, an international group of diversified building materials businesses supplying the construction industry, since 2014. Mr. Manifold joined CRH in 1998 and advanced to increasingly senior roles, including Finance Director of the Europe Materials Division, Group Development Director, Managing Director of Europe Materials, and Chief Operating Officer (2009 to 2014). Prior to joining CRH, Mr. Manifold was Chief Operating Officer of Allen McGuire & Partners, a private equity group. As a sitting chief executive officer with a background in other senior management roles, Mr. Manifold has acquired extensive leadership experience in competitive industries. With over 25 years in the building materials industry and 10 years of chief executive experience, Mr. Manifold brings significant knowledge of corporate finance, capital markets, strategic planning, acquisitions and divestitures, and international operations. Mr. Manifold is also a Fellow of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Ireland and received his M.B.A. and M.B.S. from Dublin City University.

Skills And Qualifications

  Corporate Finance

  International Operations

  Corporate Accounting

  HSES Experience

  Human Capital Management

  Risk Management

  Mergers & Acquisitions 

  CEO Experience

  Corporate Governance

  Public Policy and Compliance

  Capital Markets

  Corporate Strategy

  Capital Project Execution

  Public Company Director

Other Current Public Directorships

  CRH plc (since 2009)

Peter Vanacker, 58

Belgian-German

Executive Director since 2022

Biography
Mr. Vanacker has served as our Chief Executive Officer since May 2022. Mr. Vanacker previously served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Executive Committee of Neste Corporation, a renewable products company, from 2018 to 2022. Prior to his role at Neste, he served as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of CABB Group GmbH, a fine chemicals producer, from 2015 to 2018 and as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Treofan Group, a manufacturer of polypropylene films, from 2012 to 2015. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Member of the Executive Board of Covestro AG (formerly known as Bayer Material Science), a polymers and plastics producer, with responsibility for the global polyurethanes business and as Chief Marketing and Innovation Officer. He received his MSc in chemical engineering from Ghent University. Mr. Vanacker’s extensive experience in the oil and gas and chemicals industries, including chief executive officer and senior leadership experience, provide him with a deep understanding of the Company’s industry, operations, and feedstocks. In addition, he brings a strong understanding of circularity and sustainability issues, and extensive experience leading strategic transformations at large multinational companies. Mr. Vanacker also serves as a member of the Supervisory Board of Symrise AG, a chemicals company that is a major producer of flavors and fragrances. 
Skills And Qualifications

  Industry Experience

  HSE Experience

  CEO Experience

  Corporate Finance

  Risk Management

  Corporate Strategy

  Capital Project Execution

  International Operations

  Mergers & Acquisitions

  Technology and Innovation

  Corporate Governance

  Public Company Director

  Public Policy and Compliance

  Human Capital Management

Other Current Public Directorships

  Symrise AG (since 2020)

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell18
Back to Contents

Corporate Governance 


LOGOLYB recognizes the importance of good corporate governance as a driver of long-term stakeholder value. Our Board has adopted, and regularly reviews and strives to improve upon, LYB’s robust corporate governance policies, practices, and procedures with consideration given to regulatory developments and evolving U.S. and Dutch governance best practices.

LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

PROXY STATEMENTOur governance guidelines and policies, including those listed below, are available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking either (i) “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance” and “Board of Directors” or (ii) “Sustainability,” then “Reporting.”

ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Corporate Governance GuidelinesRules for the Board of Directors
Articles of AssociationCommittee Charters
Code of ConductBoard Profile
Financial Code of EthicsTax Strategy Disclosure
Conflict Minerals PolicyHuman Rights Policy
Human Trafficking and Anti-Slavery StatementSupplier Code of Conduct
Health, Safety, Environment, Security PolicyStakeholder Engagement Policy

Director Independence

Who is soliciting my vote?

The SupervisoryOur Board annually reviews the independence of Directors is soliciting your vote atits members. In February 2024, the 2016 Annual General MeetingBoard affirmatively determined that all of LyondellBasell Industries shareholders.

Whyour non-executive directors and director nominees are these matters being submitted for voting?

In accordance with Dutch law andindependent under the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are required to submit certain items for the approval of our shareholders. Under Dutch law, several matters that are within the authority of the board of directors under most U.S. state corporate laws require shareholder approval. Additionally, Dutch governance provisions require certain topics for discussion at the annual general meetings of shareholders that are not subject to a shareholder vote..

The adoption of our annual accounts, the discharge from liability of members of our Management and Supervisory Boards, the appointment of PwC to audit our Dutch annual accounts, the approval of dividends, and the authorization to repurchase shares all are items that we are required to submit to shareholders by reason of our being incorporated under Dutch law.

How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares?

The Supervisory Board recommends voting “FOR” all of the items presented in this proxy statement.

Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Supervisory Board of Directors.

Who is entitled to vote?

You may vote if you are the record owner of LyondellBasell shares as of the close of business on April 13, 2016. Each share is entitled to one vote. As of March 3, 2016, we had 430,449,954 shares outstanding and entitled to vote.

How many votes must be present to hold the meeting?

Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you attend the meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail. There are no quorum requirements under Dutch law. As a result, we may hold our meeting regardless of the number of shares that are present in person or by proxy at the meeting.

How many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals?

Pursuant to our Articles of Association, the nominations by the Supervisory Board of individuals to the Supervisory Board are binding on shareholders unless 2/3 of the votes cast, representing 50% of our issued share capital, vote against the nominees. This means that Supervisory Board nominees will be elected unless the votes against them constitute 2/3 of the votes representing 50% of our issued share capital.

All other proposals submitted, including the election of the members of the Management Board, require a majority of the votes cast “FOR” the proposal in order to be approved.

How do I vote?

You can vote eitherin person at the meeting orby proxy without attending the meeting.

To vote by proxy, you must vote over the internet, by telephone or by mail. Instructions for each method of voting are on the proxy card.

If you hold your LyondellBasell shares in a brokerage account (that is, you hold your shares in “street name”), your ability to vote by telephone or over the Internet depends on your broker’s voting process. Please follow the directions on your proxy card or voter instruction form carefully.

Even if you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy. If you plan to vote in person at the Annual Meeting and you hold your LyondellBasell shares in street name, you must obtain a proxy from your broker and bring that proxy to the meeting.

Can I change my vote?

Yes. You can change or revoke your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You can do this by:

Entering a new vote by telephone or over the Internet prior to 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 10, 2016;

Signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us prior to the meeting;

Sending us a written document revoking your earlier proxy; or

Voting again in person at the meeting.

Who counts the votes?

We have hired Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. to count the votes represented by proxies and cast by ballot.

Will my shares be voted if I don’t provide my proxy and don’t attend the Annual Meeting?

If you do not provide a proxy or vote your shares held in your name, your shares will not be voted.

If you hold your shares in street name, your broker may be able to vote your shares for certain “routine” matters even if you do not provide the broker with voting instructions. We believe that, pursuant to NYSE rules, only the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016 is considered to be a routine matter. Therefore, without instructions from you, the broker may not vote on any proposals other than the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.

What is a broker non-vote?

If a broker does not have discretion to vote shares held in street name on a particular proposal and does not receive instructions from the beneficial owner on how to vote those shares, the broker may return the proxy card without voting on that proposal. This is known as abroker non-vote.Broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote for any matter properly introduced at the meeting.

What if I return my proxy but don’t vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy card?

If you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote, your shares will be voted “FOR” all matters for which you did not vote.

How are votes counted?

For all proposals other than the election of Supervisory Directors and Managing Directors, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN.” For the election of Supervisory Directors and Managing Directors, you may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “WITHHOLD”. A vote to abstain or withhold does not count as a vote cast, and therefore will not have any effect on the outcome of matters.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

We are not aware of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. For matters to be properly brought before the Annual Meeting, they must be included in the meeting agenda. Discretionary authority to vote on other matters is included in the proxy designation.

Who can attend the meeting?

The Annual Meeting is open to all LyondellBasell shareholders. However, if you would like to attend the meeting, you must inform us in writing of your intention of doing so prior to May 4, 2016. The notice may be emailed to investors@lyondellbasell.com. Admittance of shareholders will be governed by Dutch law.

What is the cost of this proxy solicitation?

The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Our Supervisory Directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies by mail, by email, by telephone or in person for no additional compensation. We will also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, trustees, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by those entities, and we will, upon the request of those record holders, reimburse reasonable forwarding expenses. We will pay the costs of preparing, printing, assembling and mailing the proxy materials used in the solicitation of proxies. In addition, we have retained Alliance Advisors, LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000, plus reasonable expenses.

Why did my household receive a single set of proxy materials?

SEC rules permit us to deliver a single copy of an annual report and proxy statement to any household at which two or more shareholders reside, if we believe the shareholders are members of the same family. This benefits both you and the Company, as it eliminates duplicate mailings that shareholders living at the same address receive and it reduces our printing and mailing costs. This rule applies to any annual reports, proxy statements, proxy statements combined with a prospectus or information statements. Each shareholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card or voting instruction card.

If you prefer to receive your own copy now or in future years, please request a duplicate set by phone at (800) 579-1639, through the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com, or by email atsendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If a broker or other nominee holds your shares, you may continue to receive some duplicate mailings. Certain brokers will eliminate duplicate account mailings by allowing shareholders to consent to such elimination, or through implied consent if a shareholder does not request continuation of duplicate mailings. Since not all brokers and nominees may offer shareholders the opportunity this year to eliminate duplicate mailings, you may need to contact your broker or nominee directly to discontinue duplicate mailings to your household.

SUPERVISORY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Corporate Governance Matters

The Nominating & Governance Committee and our Supervisory Board review the Company’s governance structure to take into account changes in Dutch law, SEC and NYSE rules, as well as current best practices.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Conduct are posted on the Company’s Internet site under the “Corporate Governance” caption of the “Investor Relations” tab and are available in print upon request. The Guidelines address the following matters, among others: Supervisory Director qualifications, Supervisory Director responsibilities, Supervisory Board committees, Supervisory Director access to officers, employees and independent advisors, Supervisory Director compensation, Supervisory Board performance evaluations, Supervisory Director orientation and continuing education, and Chief Executive Officer evaluation and succession planning.

Our Supervisory Board is divided into three classes, each consisting of one-third of the total number of the members of the Supervisory Board. Messrs. Aigrain, Benet and Smith and Ms. Dicciani are each Class III Supervisory Directors whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Benet was appointed as a Class III director by our Supervisory Board in June 2015 upon a nomination by Access Industries, which owns more than 18% of our shares, pursuant to a Nomination Agreement between the company and Access. Our Supervisory Board has nominated each of Messrs. Aigrain, Benet and Smith and Ms. Dicciani for election or re-election by shareholders, as applicable.

Communications with the Supervisory Board and Shareholder Proposals

The Supervisory Board maintains a process for shareholders and interested parties to communicate with the Board. Shareholders and interested parties may write or call our Supervisory Board by contacting our Corporate Secretary, as provided below:

        Mailing Address:Corporate Secretary
LyondellBasell Industries
1221 McKinney Street, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77010
        Phone Number:(713) 309 – 7200

Communications are distributed to the Supervisory Board or to any individual Supervisory Director or Supervisory Directors, as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. In that regard, certain items that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Supervisory Board are excluded, such as: business solicitations or advertisements; junk mail and mass mailings; new product suggestions; product complaints; product inquiries; resumes and other forms of job inquiries; spam; and surveys. In addition, material that is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or similarly unsuitable will be excluded. Any communication that is filtered out is made available to any Supervisory Director upon request.

Under our Articles of Association, as amended, one or more shareholders representing solely or jointly at least 1% of our issued share capital or whose shares represent a value of €50 million or more can request the Supervisory Board to place a matter on the agenda for an annual meeting of shareholders, provided that such request is received by the Company at least 60 days before the date of the meeting. Additionally, pursuant to shareholder proposal rules issued by the SEC, if a shareholder wishes to propose a matter for inclusion in our proxy materials for consideration at our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, subject to our Articles of Association, Dutch law and certain shareholder requirements set forth in the rules of the SEC, the proposal should be mailed by certified mail return receipt requested to the Corporate Secretary at the address set forth above and must be received by the Corporate Secretary on or before November 28, 2016.

Board Leadership Structure

We have a two-tiered board, a common structure for Dutch public companies. The two boards include a Management Board, responsible for the management of the Company, and a Supervisory Board, responsible for the general oversight of the Management Board. Only executive officers of the Company may serve on the Management Board and only non-employees of the Company may serve on the Supervisory Board. Our Articles of Association provide that our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) shall serve as the Chairman of the Management Board. The following individuals are the current members of our Management Board:

Bhavesh V. (Bob) Patel, CEO and Chairman of the Management Board;

Kevin W. Brown, Executive Vice President – Manufacturing & Refining; and

Jeffrey A. Kaplan, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer.

At the Annual Meeting, we are requesting shareholders to elect each of the following executive officers as members of our Management Board:

Thomas Aebischer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”);

Daniel M. Coombs, Executive Vice President – Global Olefins & Polyolefins and Technology; and

James D. Guilfoyle, Senior Vice President – Global Intermediates & Derivatives.

More information about the Management Board and Mr. Aebischer, Mr. Coombs and Mr. Guilfoyle may be found under “Election of Managing Directors” on page 21 of this proxy statement.

The principal responsibility of the Management Board is the overall management of the Company. This means, among other things, that the Management Board is responsible for implementing LyondellBasell’s aims and strategy, managing the Company’s associated risk profile, overseeing the operation of the business and addressing corporate responsibility issues relevant to the enterprise.

The principal responsibility of the Supervisory Board is overseeing the policies of the Management Board and the general course of business and related business enterprises. Robert G. Gwin is the Chairman of the Supervisory Board.

Our two-tier board structure allows our executive officers to focus on managing our day-to-day business, including achieving our aims, strategy and risk profile, and results of operations. It also allows Mr. Gwin, as non-executive Chairman of the Supervisory Board, to lead the Supervisory Board in its fundamental role of supervising the policies of the Management Board. We believe this separation of responsibilities is appropriate for LyondellBasell because of the scope and complexity of the Company’s operations. We also believe the separation of CEO and Chairman of the Supervisory Board is a corporate governance best practice.

Role in Risk Oversight

While the Company’s Management Board is responsible for the risk profile of the Company and managing the day-to-day risks to the Company, the Supervisory Board has broad oversight as it relates to risk management. In this oversight role, the Supervisory Board is responsible for satisfying itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by the Company’s management are functioning and that necessary steps are taken to foster a culture of risk-adjusted decision-making throughout the organization. The Company believes that its leadership structure is conducive to sound risk management, and that the Supervisory Board’s involvement is appropriate to ensure effective oversight.

The primary means by which our Supervisory Board oversees our risk management structures and policies is through its regular communications with management. At each Supervisory Board meeting, executive officers

are asked to report to the Supervisory Board and, when appropriate, specific committees. Additionally, other members of management and employees periodically attend meetings and present information. One purpose of these presentations is to provide direct communication between members of the Supervisory Board and members of management. The presentations provide the Supervisory Board with the information necessary to understand the risk profile of the Company, including information regarding the specific risk environment, exposures affecting the Company’s operations and the Company’s plans to address such risks. In addition to information regarding general updates to the Company’s operational and financial condition, members of management report to the Supervisory Board about the Company’s outlook and forecasts, and any impediments to meeting those or its pre-defined strategies generally. These direct communications allow the Supervisory Board to assess the evaluation and management of the Company’s day-to-day risks.

In carrying out its oversight responsibility, the Supervisory Board has delegated to individual Supervisory Board committees certain elements of its oversight function.

The Audit Committee provides oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the Company’s independent accountants’ qualifications and independence; the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, independent accountants and the Company’s compliance program; and the Company’s system of disclosure and internal controls.

The Compensation Committee monitors the Company’s compensation structure and assesses whether any excessive risks are created by our compensation programs.

The Nominating & Governance Committee reviews policies and practices in the areas of corporate governance; considers the overall relationship of the Supervisory Board to the Company’s management; and develops, reviews and recommends governance guidelines applicable to the Company.

The Health, Safety and Environmental (“HSE”) Committee reviews and monitors compliance with health, safety and environmental matters affecting the Company and provides oversight of the Company’s technology. Our HSE Committee discusses the Company’s HSE and Operational Excellence programs, reviewing audits of operations; safety and environmental incidents and statistics; as well as action plans and initiatives to continuously improve HSE results.

The Company has an enterprise risk management function, with a group of employees dedicated to enterprise-wide risk management activities. The Management Board is responsible for overseeing the risk management programs of the Company generally, including approving risk tolerances, evaluating whether they are aligned with the Company’s strategic goals, and defining the overall risk profile of the Company. The Management Board has delegated to a Risk Management Committee the authorization to review and approve transactions that are in furtherance of the strategies as approved by the Management Board. The standing members of the Risk Management Committee include the Company’s CEO, CFO and Chief Legal Officer. Through a variety of policies and procedures, business leaders are required to identify, monitor, mitigate and report on risks under the supervision of the Management Board, which requires risk management plans from each business segment.

The results of the risk management processes and updates on materials risks are reported to the Supervisory Board and its Committees. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for ensuring that an effective risk assessment process is in place, and reports are made to the Audit Committee in accordance with NYSE requirements.

Independence of Supervisory Board Members

The Supervisory Board has determined that all twelve Supervisory Directors are independent in accordance with the NYSE listing standards.

To assist in determining independence, the Supervisory Board adopted categorical standards of Supervisory Director independence whichthat meet, orand in some instances exceed, the requirements of the NYSE. TheseIn order to qualify as independent under our categorical standards, specify certain relationships thata director must be avoideddetermined to allow forhave no material relationship with LYB other than as a finding of independence.director. The categorical standards our Supervisory Board uses in determininginclude strict guidelines for non-executive directors and their immediate families regarding employment or affiliation with LYB and its independent registered public accounting firm. Our categorical independence standards are included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which can be found on our website at www.lyb.com.Guidelines.

In July 2015, the Supervisory Board amended the categorical standards to remove two specific relationships that previously barred a finding of independence. These two relationships include: any director who (i) holds at least ten percent of the shares in the Company (including shares held by natural persons or legal entities which cooperate with him under an express or tacit, oral or written agreement); and/or (ii) is a member of the management board or supervisory board, or is a representative in some other way, of a legal entity which holds at least ten percent of the shares in the Company, unless such entity is a member of the same group as the Company. These relationships originally were included in the categorical standards to be consistent with the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (compliance with which is in accordance with the “apply-or-explain” principle and is applicable to the Company as a Dutch incorporated entity) and because of historical relationships certain large shareholders had with the Company’s predecessor before it became a listed Company. The Supervisory Board deleted these provisions after determining, consistent with the commentary to the NYSE’s listing standards, that share ownership, alone, is no longer an appropriate bar to a finding of independence. For more information on the Company’s application of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, see “Dutch Corporate Governance Code.”

The Supervisory Board has determined that there are no relationships or transactions that prohibit any of our non-executive directors or nominees from being deemed independent under the categorical standards as amended,and that would prohibit anyeach of the Supervisory Directors from being deemedour non-executive directors and nominees is independent. In addition to the relationships and transactions that would bar an independence finding under the categorical standards, the Supervisory Board considered all other known relationships and transactions in making its determination. Transactions and relationships considered included:

Company subsidiaries’ purchases of natural gas liquids from a subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum, where Mr. Gwin serves as Executive Vice President and CFO;

Company subsidiaries’ purchases of utilities from a subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, where Mr. Carroll serves as chairman;

Company subsidiaries’ engagement of the employee search and recruitment services of Michael Page International, where Mr. Buchanan served as Chairman until the end of 2015;

Company subsidiaries’ purchases of insurance coverage from a subsidiary of MassMutual Financial Group, where Ms. Goren is a director;

Mr. Benet’s position as CEO of Access Industries, the Company’s largest shareholder;

Company subsidiaries’ purchases of industrial gases,determination, including hydrogen and nitrogen, from, and sales of crude hydrogen to, Praxair, where Ms. Dicciani is a director;

Mr. Cooper’s position as CEO of Warner Music, a subsidiary of Access Industries;

Mr. Buchanan’s position as Non-Executive Chairman of Access Industries’ Investment Committee; and

Company subsidiaries’ purchases of measurement products from a subsidiary of FMC Technologies, where Ms. Farley is a director.

those referenced under “Related Party Transactions” on page 88. In determining that none of theseno known transactions or relationships affectedaffect the independence of any of the interested Supervisory Directors,non-executive directors, the Supervisory Board considered the naturethat all of the transactions and relationships. All of theidentified transactions are ordinary course and none of the dollar amounts involved waswere material to the Company or the relevant counterparty.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell19
Back to Contents

Board Leadership Structure 

Jacques Aigrain has led our Board as its independent Chair since 2018. The Chair’s responsibilities include:

Leading Board meetings and executive sessions
Reviewing and approving Board meeting agendas and schedules, and ensuring there is sufficient time for discussion of topics
Convening additional Board meetings, as needed
Facilitating information flow and communication among directors
Serving as a liaison between the independent directors and the CEO and other members of management
Together with the C&TD Committee, setting annual and long-term performance goals for the CEO and evaluating his performance
Presiding at general meetings of shareholders
Meeting or engaging with shareholders, as appropriate
Supporting the Company’s strategic growth initiatives

The Board regularly reviews LYB’s leadership structure and the responsibilities of its Chair, and may from time to time delegate additional duties to the role.

Under Dutch law, only a non-executive director may serve as Chair of our Board. Our Board believes that the separation of the positions of Chair and Chief Executive Officer that results from this governance structure promotes strong Board governance, independence, and oversight. The separation of the two roles additionally allows Mr. Aigrain to focus on managing Board matters while our CEO, Mr. Vanacker, focuses on managing our business. 

Executive Sessions 

Executive sessions of our independent directors, with no members of management present, take place at every regularly scheduled Board and committee meeting. During executive sessions, independent directors have an opportunity to meet with the Board’s outside consultants and independent accountants and review and discuss any matters they deem appropriate, such as the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and other members of management and the criteria against which performance is evaluated, including the impact of performance on compensation matters. Mr. Aigrain leads these executive sessions of the Board.

Board Evaluations 

Our Board and its committees evaluate their own effectiveness by participating in a robust annual self-assessment process overseen by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Each year, directors respond to survey questions soliciting information used to improve the effectiveness of the Board and its committees and individual directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee periodically engages independent outside consultants, including most recently in 2020, to conduct interviews with the Board and facilitate the evaluation process. The Nominating and Governance Committee has engaged an independent outside consultant to begin work in 2024 in order to refresh and bring an outside perspective to the evaluation process.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell20
Back to Contents

For 2023, the Board conducted its evaluation process as described below.

1

Development and Approval of Evaluation Process and Topics

In September 2023, the Nominating and Governance Committee discussed and approved the overall process and timeline for the 2023 evaluation cycle and identified an independent consultant for the 2024 evaluation cycle. The Nominating and Governance Committee approved the topics and questions for distribution to the individual Board members. Questions were largely consistent with those used in prior cycles, with the addition of questions to cover director expertise and succession. As in prior cycles, the Committee approved an individual evaluation process for the Chair, to be facilitated through survey questions specific to his role.

2

Distribution and Completion of Surveys

Board members provided responses to the surveys, including separate assessments for each Board committee and for the Chair. In parallel, senior executives provided their views of Board effectiveness and interactions with management through confidential survey responses provided to the Corporate Secretary.

Key areas covered in the Board and committee surveys include membership; responsibilities; functionality; meetings; strategy; senior management (including succession planning); focus on performance; ensuring financial robustness; monitoring risk; compliance; and building corporate reputation. Committee members are also asked to consider whether each committee is functioning in compliance with its charter and keeping the Board adequately informed, and to review the committee’s member skill sets and leadership. Survey questions for the individual Chair assessment focused on effective management of meetings and facilitation of constructive relationships and communication among Board members and with management.

3

Board Review and Implementation of Results

The Corporate Secretary compiled feedback from the self-evaluation process, including feedback from senior executives, which was discussed during the February 2024 committee and Board meetings in executive sessions.

Policies and practices were evaluated based on the self-assessment results, and the Board considered potential enhancements to Board processes. The Nominating and Governance Committee also considered director feedback in recommending the nomination of continuing directors for reelection.

Feedback from the process will also be provided to the independent outside consultant as part of the 2024 evaluation process, and may be used to refresh the evaluation process and adjust areas of focus for surveys beyond 2024.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell21
Back to Contents

Director Onboarding, Training, and Site Visits

Our Board is committed to understanding its governance responsibilities, evolving best practices, and all aspects of our Company and business. The Company provides an extensive orientation program that enables each new director joining the Board to become familiar with LYB and to meet with key members of the Company’s management and functional leaders. All of our non-executive directors complete our onboarding program and meet with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and the other members of our Executive Committee to discuss our corporate structure, business strategy, operations, and segments, as well as compliance, investor relations, human resources, tax, accounting, and health, safety, environment, and sustainability matters, among other topics.

All of our directors are encouraged to participate in industry and governance organizations and seek out training opportunities that will provide them with continuing education on key topics. The Company will reimburse directors for the costs of such continuing education. During Board meetings, our directors hear from management on a wide range of subjects, including regulatory developments, shareholder updates, and environmental, social, and corporate governance issues and trends. Our directors also have regular opportunities to visit the Company’s manufacturing and technology centers and meet with site management. In November 2023, nine members of our Board toured the Company’s Houston Technology Center. In addition, Mr. Bindra, our former Chair of the HSE&S Committee who retired in May 2023, visited our Fos-sur-Mer, France facility in April 2023.

Stakeholder Engagement 

We recognize the value of regular and consistent communication with our stakeholders, and engage with our investors and other stakeholders on strategy, risk management, sustainability, corporate governance, executive compensation, and other matters. In 2023, our Board adopted a Stakeholder Engagement Policy, which is available on our website, to outline our values and approach to stakeholder engagement, including shareholders. We regularly review general governance trends and emerging best practices and welcome feedback from our shareholders and other stakeholders, which is brought to our Board and helps inform its decision-making process. 

We recognize the vital role that stakeholders play in our business operations and the importance of fostering positive, collaborative relationships with them. We engage daily with stakeholders globally covering a wide variety of topics and issues, including through investor events, telephone and in-person conversations, employee discussions and surveys, customer discussions and surveys, community and local engagements, and social media interactions. We know that our stakeholders have a broad range of interests, and we strive to seek their input, listen to their perspectives and expertise, and prioritize and integrate their feedback in a strategic and sustainable manner. We recognize that different stakeholder groups have unique needs and expectations, and we tailor our engagement practices to ensure effective communication and collaboration with each group.

Engagement with shareholders occurs in one-on-one meetings and calls with shareholder representatives, at our annual general meeting of shareholders, and through our regular participation in industry conferences, investor road shows, and analyst meetings. Throughout 2023, we discussed the Company’s strategy and environmental, social, and governance profile with multiple investors and engaged with their questions or concerns on these and other topics. Our Chief Sustainability Officer regularly joins meetings to discuss our climate and sustainability ambitions. In addition, our independent Board Chair has joined these discussions when requested. Management updates the Board regularly on conversations with shareholders and feedback received. We are committed to remaining proactive in our engagement efforts and shareholder outreach.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell22
Back to Contents

Communication with the Board 

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board or any individual director. Communications should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary by email or regular mail.

Communications are distributed to the Board or to one or more individual directors, as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. Communications such as business solicitations or advertisements; junk mail and mass mailings; new product suggestions; product complaints; product inquiries; and resumes and other forms of job inquiries will not be relayed to the Board. In addition, material that is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, or similarly unsuitable will be excluded. Any communication that is filtered out is made available to any director upon request.

BY EMAIL

send an email to CorporateSecretary@LyondellBasell.com

BY MAIL

LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

c/o Corporate Secretary 

4th Floor, One Vine Street 

London W1J 0AH, United Kingdom

CEO and Management Succession Planning 

One of the primary responsibilities of the Board is to ensure that we have a high-performing management team in place. On at least an annual basis, and as needed throughout the year, the Board conducts a detailed review of development and succession planning activities to maximize the pool of internal candidates who can assume executive officer positions without undue interruption. The Board reviews CEO and executive succession planning and ensures that executive officer reviews and evaluations are conducted at least annually by the C&TD Committee and the Board as a whole. The Board also reviews in-depth assessments of the Company’s bench strength, retention, progression, and succession readiness for all other senior level managers, including succession plans for the CEO, his direct reports, and other employees critical to our continued operations and success.

Monitoring the Company’s leadership development, talent management, and succession planning is also a key responsibility of our C&TD Committee, which devotes significant time to discussion and oversight of the Company’s human resources strategy. Our strategy includes efforts to hire, retain, and fairly compensate a diverse and representative workforce. 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell23
Back to Contents

Human Capital Management 

Our success as a company is tied to the passion, knowledge, and talent of our global team. To achieve our purpose of creating solutions for everyday sustainable living, we must attract top performers and equip them with the tools needed to continuously grow and leverage their potential.

What We Do


We believe in integrity, diversity, and fairness

We focus on creating a work environment that is safe, respectful, and inspires employees to strive for excellence

We believe in championing our employees and the power of impactful collaboration

We reward performance based on personal, team, and company results

We engage in open and ongoing dialogue with employees and their representatives to ensure a proper balance between the best interests of the Company and its employees

We have a Human Rights Policy available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Sustainability,” then “Reporting”

Key 2023 Focus Areas 

Stepping up Performance and Culture: Our Transformation

Our culture reflects the role we seek to play in the world, what we uniquely deliver, and how we behave day to day. In 2023, LYB introduced a new long-term strategy and began the transformation of our company culture. Along with our new strategy, we identified three core values: We Champion People, We Strive for Excellence, and We Shape the Future. As part of our work last year, we established a cultural steering team and initiated a cultural ambassador program to help drive our work in advancing the transformation.

To reflect our new strategy and values, we refreshed our “LYB competencies,” which provide a framework for how we behave day to day to help us achieve our strategic goals. They inform the way we hire, reward, develop, and retain our employees. Our LYB competencies focus on five key areas: Building Partnerships, Delivering Results, Driving Innovation, Growing Capabilities, and Promoting Inclusion. We introduced the new competencies to the organization in 2023 and will be further integrating them into our programs in 2024. 

A key tenant of our culture is what we call GoalZERO. GoalZERO is our commitment to operating safely with zero injuries and zero process safety, product safety and environmental incidents. We cultivate a GoalZERO mindset with clear standards, regular communication, training, targeted campaigns and events, including our annual Global Safety Day. In 2023, we extended our industry-leading safety record with a total recordable incident rate of 0.139 and a process safety incident rate of 0.035. 60 of our manufacturing sites achieved GoalZERO, and 67 manufacturing sites were injury-free. As we accelerate our cultural transformation, we remain committed to our pursuit of GoalZERO safety performance and operational excellence.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (“DEI”)

Our vision for the future is that LYB is a place where there is genuine equal opportunity for all and DEI is embedded within our culture as deeply as safety. DEI remained a key focus in 2023. Our efforts reflect a holistic, multi-year strategy to improve representation, ensure fairness, and increase visibility and accountability to leadership.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell24
Back to Contents
Diversity 

Cultivating a diverse workforce has a powerful impact on our culture and performance by broadening the perspectives and experiences represented in our organization. In 2022, we set five-year goals to increase the number of female senior leaders globally to at least 33% and the number of senior leaders from underrepresented populations in the U.S. to at least 29%, representing 50% increases in both groups relative to a 2022 baseline. In the long term, we have committed to achieving gender parity in global senior leadership (i.e., approximately 50% women and 50% men) and population parity in U.S. senior leadership (i.e., representation of underrepresented populations equal to their proportion of the U.S. population) by 2032. Our DEI goals help us retain and attract top talent and reflect the input of our employees, customers, communities, investors and other stakeholders. 

In 2023, we made progress towards our goals. As of December 31, 2023, women served in 25% of global senior leadership roles, an increase from 22% in 2022. In the U.S., 19% of senior leaders were from underrepresented populations, consistent with the prior year. Our Executive pay band (the highest level of leadership) also experienced representation growth in women and underrepresented populations. Women now make up 27% of this band, an increase from 24% in 2022, while the percentage of individuals from underrepresented populations grew from 19% in 2022 to 23% in 2023. Of the ten members on our Executive Committee, comprised of senior executives who lead LyondellBasell’s businesses and functions, four are women, and together, our CEO and Executive Committee represent six different nationalities. 

Our increase in female representation is the result of increased external hiring and exceptional retention performance. In 2023, the attrition rate of female employees decreased from 9% in 2022 to 3% in 2023. We attribute part of this success to our focus on talent development and offering a compelling employee value proposition. For employees from underrepresented populations, hiring, promotion, and attrition rates all improved. While still higher than desired, the attrition rate for employees from underrepresented populations decreased from 14% in 2022 to 9% in 2023. This, coupled with the addition of new senior leadership roles in the U.S., resulted in flat overall representation when compared to 2022. Despite this, we still experienced a net gain in the number of employees from underrepresented populations resulting from a 21% increase in senior leadership headcount.

Equity 

Our efforts to improve equity are focused on ensuring that our systems and process are fair to all employees. This also requires us to ensure we are communicating transparently with our employees. Our goal is for 100% of employees to believe they are being treated fairly. Similar to our GoalZERO safety culture, our approach to equity focuses on continuous improvement and striving for excellence. To measure our progress, we conduct annual engagement surveys with our employees. Our most recent survey in 2023 indicates that 83% of employees who responded feel they are being treated fairly.

For the third consecutive year, LYB completed a pay equity review and performance analysis. Our pay equity review compared pay for like jobs and specifically focused on base pay for gender (globally) and ethnicity (U.S. only). Consistent with 2022 findings, the review reflected that pay is generally administered fairly. 

In 2023, we also implemented several practices to advance equity, including:

Establishing an Equity Committee to ensure key People and Culture policies are developed and audited annually;
Conducting a DEI review of our benefits, which resulted in greater coverage of employees’ dependents, ongoing global plan harmonization, and enhanced mental health support; and
Expanding our employee recognition program, Bravo!, to 33 countries and offering enhanced features to promote collaboration and the celebration of holidays globally.

Inclusion 

Promoting a culture of inclusion is critical. Like our equity goal, we strive to have 100% of our employees feel they are included and belong. Our most recent engagement survey in 2023 indicates that 80% of respondents feel like they belong at the Company. To drive change, we focus our inclusion efforts on key initiatives that include learning and education, outreach, and employee networks. 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell25
Back to Contents

We advanced our inclusion efforts with our six global networks, which are composed of diverse groups of employees championing inclusion. In 2023, we achieved 18% participation in our global networks, which is a 20% increase relative to 2022. Network programming is strongly tied to career development and business and community impact. Our engagement survey indicates that participants in our employee networks are 20% more engaged than employees who are not members of a network. Additionally, participants in employee networks are 10% more likely to report satisfaction with the Company’s future than employees who are not members of a network. 

Our company has prioritized and implemented DEI training to accelerate change in our workforce at all levels. In 2023, development was primarily focused on our manufacturing workforce and People and Culture professionals. We engaged 7,145 manufacturing employees with DEI training through guided topics and learning materials led by supervisors and leadership at the site level. These leader-led discussions were completed at 86 sites globally and in local languages. For our People and Culture employees, we focused on DEI upskilling and building capability to better address and champion DEI in day-to-day activities and interactions with leaders. Through regional training sessions, we trained 288 People and Culture employees in 2023. We believe our People and Culture community is in a unique position to further embed DEI into everything we do. 

Global Talent Development 

LYB is committed to creating continuous learning environments, providing ongoing development, growing capabilities, and unlocking potential for all employees to perform at their best. Our value, We Champion People, is underscored by our focus on growth and development in an inclusive environment. We develop our employees through a balance of experience on the job, learning from others, and formal learning. 

In 2023, we expanded our LYBUniversity to include additional formal learning and development resources to empower our employees to grow their capabilities. To build skills and capabilities necessary for leaders to guide their teams through our culture transformation, we offered multiple learning opportunities. Through different learning workshops focusing on culture and change, we engaged with more than 2,000 leaders and provided resources to support the conversations and transformation with their teams.  Our e-learning platform empowers employees to drive their own development through on-demand learning. More than 35% of our workforce is enrolled in the platform, and participants have completed more than 200,000 training hours building and enhancing business, technology and personal development skills. We also have a leadership development framework that offers programs with structured learning paths tailored to equip leaders at different stages with the necessary skills to excel in their current role and prepare them for future challenges.

On-the-job development is key to building the knowledge and skills to deliver our strategy.  Through internal job postings, we provide transparency and opportunity for our employees to drive their development and career growth. Additionally, we held quarterly talent reviews across businesses and regions to not only identify our potential future leaders but also to identify development opportunities. As a result of this focused approach, about 70% of our openings in senior leader roles were filled by internal talent, underscoring our commitment to growing talent from within the Company.

LYB is committed to advancing our people by helping them develop achievable goals that promote personal and professional growth, providing continual on-going effective feedback to create a culture of ownership for our work and success, and supporting a culture of recognition and accountability. Our performance management process includes ongoing feedback and a formal year-end performance assessment. This year, we introduced an Equity Champion role into the year-end performance management process to listen for equitable discussions on performance. We also implemented tools and steps for reviewing equity throughout the year-end performance management process. We are committed to auditing these key programs annually to ensure that they are operating as intended. 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell26
Back to Contents

Approach to Sustainability 

As one of the world’s largest producers of plastics and chemicals, we strive to use our scale and reach to make a positive impact on our planet and society. LYB is working to help tackle the global challenges of eliminating plastic waste in the environment, taking climate action, and supporting a thriving society. Our sustainability goals are key to achieving our new long-term business strategy.

(1)Production and marketing includes (i) joint venture production marketed by LYB plus our pro rata share of the remaining production produced and marketed by the joint venture, and (ii) production via third-party tolling arrangements.

2023 Actions and Milestones 

We continue to take substantive action to achieve our sustainability and climate goals. Our commitment to sustainability and our progress in executing our new strategy have been recognized by organizations that assess and rate ESG performance. MSCI upgraded our ESG rating to “leader” with a score of “AA,” and LYB received an “A-” in the latest CDP Climate Change disclosure, placing us in a leadership position for climate action. Noteworthy initiatives and accomplishments during 2023 are highlighted below, as well as in the Company’s annual Sustainability Report, available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking on “Sustainability,” then “Reporting.” Our Sustainability Report includes our sustainability disclosures under the Global Reporting Initiative (“GRI”), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”), and the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”). For more information about how our sustainability actions and milestones impact executive compensation, see the section titled “2023 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail—2023 Annual Bonus Payments—Sustainability” on page 53.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell27
Back to Contents

Ending Plastic Waste 

As a leader in the global chemical industry, we understand the important role plastics play in society. They enhance people’s lives as the backbone of many core applications, from healthcare to housing, food packaging and more. The challenge we face is the mismanagement of plastic waste. This is why we are accelerating our efforts to innovate, scale, and deliver solutions to turn post-use plastics into everyday products and reduce plastic waste in the environment.

In 2022, we launched our Circular and Low Carbon Solutions (CLCS) business to support our ambition to produce and market at least two million metric tons of recycled and renewable-based polymers annually by 2030.(1) Our Circulen portfolio of products support the reduction of plastic waste in the environment through the use of recycled and renewable materials as a feedstock. These products are produced using raw materials derived from mechanical recycling (CirculenRecover), advanced recycling (CirculenRevive), or renewable materials (CirculenRenew).As global demand for recycled and renewable-based plastics continues to grow, we are making investments in our CLCS business to secure feedstock supply, expand our recycling footprint, and develop scalable technologies to grow our Circulen family of recycled and renewable-based polymers.  

In 2023, the CLCS business made significant progress investing upstream to secure plastic waste material to deliver on this recycling ambition. The investments we make under our CLCS business are focused on securing feedstock supply, expanding our recycling footprint and developing scalable technologies to grow our Circulen portfolio of products globally and across our business segments. Our Circulen products support the reduction of plastic waste in the environment through the use of recycled content as a material feedstock.

In furtherance of this goal, we formed joint ventures to build plastics recycling infrastructure in Europe, Asia, and North America. The recycled products produced by these joint ventures will be marketed through our Circulen Recover and Circulen Revive product portfolio to help meet increasing global demand for sustainable solutions. In November 2023, we made the final investment decision to build LYB’s first commercial catalytic advanced recycling plant at our Wesseling, Germany site. LYB will use its proprietary MoReTec technology to convert post-consumer plastic waste into feedstock for delivery of new plastic materials. In addition, we entered a collaboration with two other companies to advance development of a first-of-its-kind plastic waste sorting and processing facility in the Houston, Texas area. The new facility would address a critical missing link in the plastic waste supply chain by connecting community recycling programs to new and more advanced recycling technologies that have the potential to accept a much wider variety of plastic materials.

Taking Climate Action

We are committed to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from our global operations and value chain, and delivering solutions that advance our customers’ climate ambitions. Carbon is the atom of life, and carbon molecules will continue to play a critical role in our industry. They are a key component of the products we make, so we are increasing our use of circular and sustainable sources of carbon while creating solutions to help enable the transition to a low carbon future. In 2023, we introduced a new product range, +LC (Low Carbon) solutions, manufactured using the International Sustainability and Carbon Certification PLUS (ISCC+) mass balance methodology. +LC products include core offerings from our intermediates and derivatives segment, from styrene monomers to propylene oxide (PO), with applications in various sectors, including insulation materials, automotive and consumer goods.

Within our global operations, we have set industry-leading, ambitious targets to reduce our GHG emissions and have taken concrete steps to achieve our goals. In the last two years, we accelerated our interim targets for 2030 by increasing or scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions reduction goals to 42% and establishing a scope 3 emissions reduction target of 30%, relative to a 2020 baseline.

Our ambition to reach net zero scope 1 and 2 emissions from global operations by 2050 is focused on four levers: energy efficiency; renewables and electrification; hydrogen and other technologies; and carbon capture, use and storage. This strategy encompasses our plans for organic growth, divestitures and previously announced asset closures, including the cessation of our Houston refining operations by no later than the first quarter of 2025.

(1)Production and marketing includes (i) joint venture production marketed by LYB plus our pro rata share of the remaining production produced and marketed by the joint venture, and (ii) production via third-party tolling arrangements.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell28
Back to Contents

In 2023, we increased the use of renewable and low carbon energy primarily through power purchase agreements (PPAs). As of December 31, 2023, we have already completed enough PPAs globally to secure nearly 90% of our target to procure at least 50% of electricity from renewable sources by 2030, bringing our total procured renewable electricity to 1,385 megawatts. In addition, we are exploring the potential to design, build, and operate a pilot electric steam cracking furnace in the United States. In 2023, we also established our inaugural green financing framework, which reflects the decisive steps we are taking to allocate capital toward initiatives aligned with our approach to sustainability, and issued a $500 million green bond, the net proceeds of which will be allocated toward eligible green projects. 

We recognize the vital role we play in maintaining and enhancing the health and prosperity of our planet. We aim to cultivate our planet by unlocking opportunities to protect precious resources, from resource recovery to water efficiencies, and mitigating the destruction of critical ecosystems. In 2023, we made significant progress in the development of our environmental strategy, establishing a clear action plan to execute in the years ahead. We also endorsed the United Nations CEO Water Mandate, committing to adopting and implementing a comprehensive approach to water management. Work in 2023 included evaluating ways to improve our water governance, and assessing our water-related opportunities, risks, management approaches and documentation. This work provides the foundation for our planned site-specific evaluations at our large sites and those located in high water stress regions. 

Supporting a Thriving Society 

We are working to achieve a thriving society where every individual has the opportunity to reach their full potential. We actively contribute to a thriving society through our relentless pursuit of safety, operational excellence, and a diverse, inclusive and equitable workforce. We partner with the communities where we operate to make positive impacts, and are committed to giving back by partnering with local organizations on initiatives to address critical needs. In 2023, our people volunteered more than 21,000 hours across our sites. LYB donated more than $14 million to community investments, including financial and in-kind donations and the total value of employee volunteer hours.

LYB is committed to conducting business in an ethical and responsible manner. Our Code of Conduct embodies our dedication to conducting business ethically and responsibly and our Human Rights Policy sets forth our commitment to upholding human rights throughout our global operations. We have adopted a Global Procurement Policy that outlines a framework of principles and requirements to ensure compliance with our Human Rights Policy, and have incorporated in our standard contracts and purchase order terms and conditions a Supplier Code of Conduct. We evaluate our suppliers’ compliance through risk assessments, ratings, audits, and sustainability assessments. In 2023, we formed our Global Sustainable Procurement program to accelerate improvement in our supply chain and completed a supplier sustainability risk mapping project using the EcoVadis IQ platform to gain a detailed view of the risks in the areas of environment, social standards, and ethical risk. We surpassed our initial target of 700 supplier assessments, achieving over 1500 rated suppliers.  In addition, we launched our Together for Sustainability (“TfS”) audit program in 2023. We foster relationships across our entire value chain to create better outcomes, successfully address global challenges, and amplify our impact on society and the planet.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell29
Back to Contents

Board Oversight of Risk

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
As part of its overall responsibility for governance and oversight of the Company, the Board has empowered its committees with oversight responsibility for the risks described below, which are tailored to each committee’s area of focus and set forth in its charter. Although each committee is responsible for evaluating and overseeing the management of certain risks, the entire Board is regularly informed of such risks through committee reports, presented at every regularly scheduled Board meeting, and through regular communication with management. The Board is responsible for ensuring that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are functioning and for fostering a culture of risk-adjusted decision-making throughout the organization.
Audit CommitteeC&TD CommitteeNom-Gov CommitteeHSE&S CommitteeFinance Committee

   Responsible for ensuring that an effective risk assessment process is in place, and reports are made by management to the Audit Committee in accordance with NYSE requirements.

   Oversees enterprise-wide financial risks and reviews cybersecurity performance and risk

   Oversees financial statements, independent accountants, internal audit function, related party transactions, internal controls;

   Oversees compliance programs and EthicsPoint reporting helpline

   Responsible for the Company’s executive compensation programs, and evaluates risks in connection with such programs

   Oversees talent management and related risks, including our DEI initiatives

   Monitors talent development and responsible for management retention, recruitment, and succession planning

   Oversees the Company’s overall ESG profile and strategy

   Reviews corporate governance practices and develops, reviews, and recommends corporate governance guidelines and policies

   Responsible for director succession planning

   Reviews and monitors health and safety risks, programs, statistics and incidents (including major health, safety, environment, and security events)

   Reviews and monitors environmental and sustainability risks, goals, trends and impacts, including climate initiatives and risk

   Oversees sustainability reporting

   Oversees strategic transactions, including those that may impact our capital position

   Reviews our tax strategy and planning

   Reviews our capital structure, capital allocation, dividend policy, share repurchase programs, dept profile, and hedging strategies

MANAGEMENT
Senior leadership is responsible for assessing and managing the Company’s day-to-day risks and related control systems. Our CEO manages the Company’s risk profile through his Executive Committee, comprised of senior executives who lead our business segments and key functions. Our CEO and his Executive Committee meet regularly to identify, monitor, assess, mitigate, and report risks. The members of the Executive Committee play an important role in managing risks, and they include, among others: our Chief Financial Officer, who oversees our tax, treasury, internal audit, financial, M&A and strategic planning functions; our General Counsel, who oversees our Enterprise Risk Management organization and our procurement, compliance and legal functions; our Chief Innovation Officer, who oversees information technology, cybersecurity, and data privacy; our Executive Vice President, Sustainability and Corporate Affairs, who is responsible for our sustainability strategy and reporting; our Executive Vice President, People and Culture, who is responsible for talent management and DEI initiatives; and our Executive Vice President, Operational Excellence and HSE, who oversees health, safety, and environmental risks. Senior leadership is supported by the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management organization, composed of employees dedicated to deploying our enterprise  wide risk management framework, and the standing Risk Management Committee, which is led by our CEO, CFO and General Counsel and reviews certain financial and strategic transactions for compliance with risk management policies and procedures. In addition, through a variety of policies and procedures, senior management is assisted by their respective leadership teams and organizations in identifying, monitoring, mitigating, and reporting risks and developing risk management plans aligned with the Company’s enterprise risk management framework. The results of the risk management processes and updates on material risks are reported to the Board and its committees on a regular basis.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell30
Back to Contents

Selected Areas of Board Oversight

OVERSIGHT OF STRATEGY
Our Board is responsible for providing governance and oversight over the strategy, operations, and management of our Company. The primary means by which our Board oversees the Company’s short-, intermediate-, and long-term risks is through regular communication with management. At each Board meeting, members of management are asked to report to the Board and, when appropriate, specific committees. These presentations provide members of the Board with direct communication with management and the information necessary for a full understanding of the Company’s risk profile, including information regarding the Company’s strategy, specific risk environment, exposures potentially affecting our operations, and the Company’s plans to address such risks. In addition to providing general updates on the Company’s operational and financial condition, members of management report to the Board about the Company’s outlook, forecasts, and any impediments to meeting them or to successfully pursuing the Company’s strategy more generally. In 2023, management and the Board reviewed progress on the Company’s strategy at each of its regularly-scheduled meetings and discussed progress, challenges and lessons learned at its annual strategy meeting in July, including a deep dive review of the Value Enhancement Program.
OVERSIGHT OF CYBERSECURITY
We recognize the risk posed by global cybersecurity threats, and our Board is regularly updated on emerging risks and maintains oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity program implemented to address them. In 2023, management provided a detailed cybersecurity update to the Board and led discussions on specific cybersecurity and process control topics at its September meeting. The Audit Committee also reviewed updates to the Company’s cybersecurity dashboard, which summarizes key security metrics and activities, at each of its regularly-scheduled meetings and participated in a detailed discussion at its August meeting, including a discussion led by members of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Cyber and Privacy Innovation Institute. The Company is not aware of any material incidents relating to the Company or third-party information systems security affecting the safety of our operations or ability to serve customers or significant breaches of personal information in the past three years. The Company had no fines from data protection authorities in the past three years and maintains a cybersecurity insurance policy.

OVERSIGHT OF ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Our Board is committed to sustainability, social responsibility, and good corporate governance and delegates oversight to its committees.

Our Health, Safety, Environmental, and Sustainability (HSE&S) Committee oversees risks and opportunities related to safety, sustainability and climate change. Management reports on key sustainability and climate topics and initiatives at each regularly scheduled HSE&S Committee meeting, and the Board participates in a deep dive on sustainability strategy and actions at least annually. During the Board’s annual strategy meeting in July 2023, the Board reviewed the Company’s strategy, progress, and programs related to its goals on sustainability, climate and the circular economy, and the HSE&S Committee reviewed updates to the Company’s ESG dashboard, which summarizes key environmental, social and governance metrics and activities, at each of its regularly-scheduled meetings.

Our Compensation and Talent Development (C&TD) Committee oversees our talent management practices, including compensation policies and practices, succession planning, and our DEI strategy, initiatives, and progress. The C&TD Committee monitors the Company’s compensation policies and practices to determine whether its risk management objectives are being met with respect to incentivizing its employees. The Company believes that its compensation arrangements do not encourage excessive risk taking and that its compensation programs and policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We recognize the importance of diversity at all levels of our organization, and our C&TD Committee reviews our progress on our DEI and talent development goals with management regularly to improve transparency and outcomes. DEI remained one of the four primary goal areas for our human resources department in 2023, and our EVP of People and Culture routinely updates the C&TD Committee on progress. In 2023, the Board reviewed succession planning, talent development and progress towards DEI goals at two of its regularly-scheduled meetings. The Board conducted a detailed discussion on DEI as part of its annual strategy session in July, reviewing details on initiatives to accelerate the attraction and development of diverse talent, close experience gaps, advance high potential and diverse leaders, and identify weaknesses in the talent pipeline.

Our Nominating and Governance (Nom-Gov) Committee oversees the Company’s corporate governance practices and related risks. The Nom-Gov Committee reviews our corporate governance policies and Board committee charters annually and approves amendments as needed to align with evolving U.S. and Dutch governance best practices and regulatory developments. In 2023, our Nom-Gov Committee reviewed updates to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, approved amendments to various committee charters, and adopted a new Board profile establishing guidelines for the selection of director candidates. Our Nom-Gov Committee is also responsible for Board succession planning, Board refreshment, and recruiting and recommending nominees to the full Board for election. In 2023, our Nom-Gov Committee evaluated numerous candidates and successfully recruited our new director nominee.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell31
Back to Contents

Enterprise Risk Management

LYB’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) organization, led by our General Counsel, is responsible for defining our overall risk profile and overseeing our risk management programs. Our ERM team aims to integrate a forward-thinking risk culture into every level of our organization by providing actionable risk management insights to leadership and equipping employees and management with tailored frameworks, tools, and processes to address significant threats and opportunities. 

In 2023, our ERM function focused on four strategic priorities: (1) enterprise level risks, (2) departmental risks, (3) climate change risk management, and (4) building risk management capabilities. 

Enterprise Level Risks

Enterprise level risks are threats and opportunities that have the potential to impact LYB’s overarching objectives, operations, and reputation. Our CEO and the Executive Committee play a key role in identifying, reviewing, and managing enterprise level risks. Each year, our ERM team leads a risk workshop with the CEO and his Executive Committee and senior leaders to refresh our enterprise risk profile. Together, the participants validate existing enterprise risks (both opportunities and threats), select new and emerging risks to add to the risk register, and ensure risk ownership is appropriately assigned across the organization. The updated enterprise risk profile is reviewed and approved by the Board annually at its September meeting. The direct line of communication between the Supervisory DirectorsBoard, members of management, and the ERM function fosters a culture of accountability and collaboration throughout the organization, and allows the Board and its committees to better assess the management of the Company’s largest shareholder do not precludeday-to-day risks.

Departmental Risks

Departmental risks are specific to a findingparticular business unit, project, or operational area within the organization, and are identified through surveys, workshops, and interviews facilitated by the ERM team. Workshops are conducted periodically to validate existing risks, identify new and emerging risks, and assign individual risk ownership. Common risks across multiple departments are elevated to the Executive Committee. This dual approach blends both top-down and bottom-up perspectives and cultivates a culture where risk considerations are intrinsic to decision-making processes.

Climate Change Risk Management

Climate change risks include both physical risks stemming from the direct impact of independence.

climate change on the environment and our assets and operations, and transition risks and opportunities that arise from the global shift toward a lower carbon and more sustainable economy. Our Executive Vice President, Operational Excellence and HSE oversees climate-related risk exposures throughout LYB and our extended supply chain, supported by our Operational Excellence, Sustainability, and ERM organizations and cross-functional steering committees. We address specific climate-related risks through structured response plans, which are implemented through our Sustainability Council and NetZero Transition Steering Committee, with input and alignment from the Executive Committee and the HSE&S Committee of the Board. We utilize the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework to guide our approach to reporting and disclosure, underscoring our commitment to transparency.

Building Risk Management Capabilities

Meetings and Board Committees

The SupervisoryERM function spearheads various initiatives focused on cultivating skills, processes, and tools essential for robust risk identification, assessment, and mitigation across all organizational tiers. One such initiative is the Global Risk Champions Network, a diverse group of LYB employees who serve as a bridge between the ERM function and the broader business. Our Risk Champions facilitate cross-functional communication, integrate risk considerations across different business functions, and foster collaboration and a unified approach to risk management throughout LYB.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell32
Back to Contents

Board and Committee Information

This section provides board and committee membership information as of the date of this proxy statement. For more information about our 2024 director nominees and committee membership following the 2024 Annual General Meeting, including Ms. Karlin’s proposed committee appointments, see “Item 1 Election of Directors” on page 10.

The Board currently has five standing committees, each consisting entirely of independent directors:

Audit Committee
Compensation and Talent Development (“C&TD”) Committee
Nominating and Governance Committee
Health, Safety, Environmental, and Sustainability (“HSE&S”) Committee
Finance Committee

Our Audit Committee meets at least five times each year in alignment with our financial reporting and audit cycle, and our C&TD Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, and HSE&S Committee each meet at least four times each year in connection with regularly scheduled Board meetings (other than the Board’s strategy session held in July), and hold additional meetings as needed. Our Finance Committee meets as needed to oversee the matters it is responsible for. Committees regularly receive reports from LYB management, report on committee actions to the Board, and may retain outside advisors.

In 2023, the Board held fivesix regularly scheduled meetings. Our directors’ average attendance rate at Board and committee meetings in 2015. Eachwas 97%, and each of the Supervisory Directorsour current directors attended at least 75%93% of the total meetings of the Supervisory Board and of each committeecommittees of which he or she was a member. TheOur Chair is a member of the Audit Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Finance Committee, and regularly attends meetings of the C&TD Committee. Although the Company does not maintain a policy regarding Supervisory Board members’directors’ attendance at its general meetings of shareholders, both our Chair and CEO attend the Company’s annual general meetings. meeting each year and will attend the 2024 annual general meeting (the “Annual Meeting”).

The Supervisory Boardtable below provides membership and itsmeeting information for each of the Board’s standing committees regularly hold executive sessions, at which membersas of management are not present. All such sessions are ledthe date of this proxy statement.

NameAuditCompensation &
Talent Development
Nominating &
Governance
HSE&SFinance
Jacques Aigrain  
Lincoln Benet   
Robin Buchanan   
Tony Chase   
Bob Dudley   
Claire Farley   
Rita Griffin   
Michael Hanley   
Virginia Kamsky   
Albert Manifold   
Peter Vanacker     
2023 MEETINGS54453
ChairMember

Each of our committees has a written charter, approved by the respective ChairsBoard. The charters can be found on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance,” then “Board of the Supervisory Board or committee, as applicable.

The Supervisory Board has four standing committees to assist it in the execution of its responsibilities. The committees are the Audit Committee, Nominating & Governance Committee, Compensation Committee and HSE Committee. The charter of each committee states that it will be composed of a minimum of three members of the Supervisory Board.Directors.” Each committee functions under aannually reviews and recommends any changes to its charter adopted by the Supervisory Board as described below.and conducts an evaluation of committee performance with respect to delegated duties and responsibilities.

Audit Committee

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell33
Back to Contents
Audit Committee

Chair:Michael Hanley*
Members: Jacques Aigrain*, Tony Chase*, Claire Farley
Independence:All Members

Audit Committee Financial Experts

5 Meetings
83% Attendance

The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Smith (Chairman), Mr. Aigrain, Ms. Dicciani and Ms. Goren. The Supervisory Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and is a financial expert under the SEC’s rules. The determination was based on a thorough review of our Audit Committee members’ education and financial and public company experience. The Supervisory Board also determined that each member has satisfied the heightened independence requirements of Section 10A(m)(3) of the Exchange Act, in addition to our categorical standards.

Mr. Smith serves on no public company audit committees other than ours. Mr. Aigrain and Ms. Dicciani both serve on two public company audit committees in addition to ours, and Ms. Goren serves on one public company audit committee in addition to ours.

The Audit Committee met five times during 2015. The Audit Committee generally is responsible for overseeing all matters relating to our financial statements and reporting;reporting, our internal audit function and independent auditors;auditors, and our compliance function. As part of its function, the Audit Committee reports the results of its activities to the full Supervisory Board. Listed below are the general responsibilities of the Audit Committee. In addition to its oversight role of risk management as described above under “Role in Risk Oversight,” the Audit Committee’s duties are set forth in a written charter that was approved by the Supervisory Board. A copy of the charter can be found on our website at www.lyb.com.

 

Administrative Responsibilities - Perform an annual self-assessment;

Independent Auditor - Engage external auditor, review performance, and approve compensation; review independence and establish policies relating to the hiring of auditor employees; and pre-approve audit and non-audit services;

Internal Audit - Review plans, staffing, and activities as well asof the internal audit function and its effectiveness;

Financial Statements - Review financial statements and earnings releases; discuss and review accounting policies and practices and external auditor reviews; and discuss and review the effectiveness of internal controls; and

Risk Management — Monitor the Company’s major financial and other risk exposures, including oversight of the Company’s policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and management, information technology and cybersecurity risks; and

Compliance - Review plans, staffing, and functionactivities of the Company’s Compliance function;compliance function and its effectiveness; establish and review procedures for complaints, including anonymous complaints regarding accounting, controls, and auditing; and review the Company’s Code of Conduct and system for monitoring compliance therewith.

Our Board has determined that all Audit Committee members are independent under the NYSE listing standards, our categorical independence standards, and the heightened independence requirements applicable to audit committee members under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. Our Board has also determined that all Audit Committee members are financially literate in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and that Messrs. Hanley, Aigrain, and Chase qualify as audit committee financial experts under SEC rules.

Compensation and Talent Development (“C&TD”) Committee
Chair:Albert Manifold
Members: Tony Chase, Rita Griffin, Virginia Kamsky
Independence:All Members
4 Meetings
100% Attendance

The C&TD Committee is responsible for overseeing our executive compensation, talent management and diversity, equity and inclusion (“DEI”) programs and developing the Company’s compensation philosophy. 

In fulfilling its responsibility for the oversight of compensation matters, the C&TD Committee may delegate authority for day-to-day administration and interpretation of the Company’s compensation plans to Company employees, including responsibility for the selection of participants, determination of award levels within plan parameters, and approval of award documents. The C&TD Committee may not, however, delegate authority for matters affecting the compensation and benefits of the Company’s executive officers. The C&TD Committee’s responsibilities include the following:

Executive Compensation — Approve the compensation and benefits of executive officers; review executive compensation practices to ensure consistency with corporate objectives; review and approve CEO goals and objectives and evaluate CEO performance; and make recommendations to the Board regarding CEO and other executive officer compensation;
Company Compensation and Benefits — Review the Company’s compensation philosophy, programs, and practices; review and approve pension and benefit arrangements as well as funding of pension and benefit plans; review pay equity for the Company; and make recommendations to the Board on these subjects; and 
Talent Management — Review the Company’s organizational leadership structure and oversee leadership development, talent management, DEI initiatives, and succession and continuity planning for the CEO and other executive officers.

Our Board has determined that all C&TD Committee members are independent under the NYSE listing standards, our categorical independence standards, and other independence requirements applicable to compensation committee members under NYSE rules.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation — No member of the C&TD Committee serves or has served as an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries and, during 2023, no executive officer served on the compensation committee or board of any entity that employed any member of our C&TD Committee or Board.

For additional information on the C&TD Committee, including information regarding compensation consultants engaged during 2023, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 46.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell34
Back to Contents
Nominating and Governance Committee
Chair:Claire Farley
Members: Jacques Aigrain, Lincoln Benet, Robin Buchanan
Independence:All Members 
4 Meetings
100% Attendance

The Nominating and Governance Committee is primarily responsible for identifying nominees for election to the Board and overseeing matters regarding corporate governance. 

To fulfill those duties, the Nominating and Governance Committee has the responsibilities summarized below:

Directors and Director Nominees — Identify and recommend candidates for membership on the Board and recommend committee memberships; director recruitment and succession planning;
Director Compensation — Evaluate and recommend director compensation; 
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Matters — Review the Company’s environmental, social, and governance profile and make necessary recommendations; review and propose modifications to the Company’s corporate governance documents and policies; review strategy and ratings; and review and comment on shareholder proposals; and
Administrative — Coordinate evaluations by committees and the full Board.

Health, Safety, Environmental and Sustainability (“HSE&S”) Committee
Chair:Rita Griffin
Members: Robin Buchanan, Bob Dudley, Virginia Kamsky, Albert Manifold
Independence:All Members
5 Meetings
100% Attendance

The HSE&S Committee assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities by assessing the effectiveness of health, safety, environmental, and sustainability programs and initiatives that support Company policies.

The specific responsibilities of the HSE&S Committee are summarized below: 

HSE — Review and monitor the Company’s health, safety, environmental and climate policies and performance results, including processes to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations; review with management environment, health, safety, and product stewardship issues that can have a material impact on the Company; and review the status of related policies, programs, and practices;
Sustainability — Provide oversight of the Company’s sustainability programs, initiatives, and activities; review with management relevant sustainability risks and trends; and monitor the Company’s progress on sustainability targets, ambitions, and reporting; and
Audit — Review and approve the scope of the Company’s health, safety, and environmental audit program; regularly monitor audit program results; and review and approve the annual budget for the health, safety, and environmental audit program.

Finance Committee
Chair:Lincoln Benet 
Members: Jacques Aigrain, Bob Dudley, Michael Hanley
Independence:All Members
3 Meetings
100% Attendance

The Finance Committee is responsible for monitoring and assessing such matters as the Company’s capital structure and allocation, strategic transactions, debt portfolio, and tax and derivative strategies.

In fulfilling its duties, the Finance Committee has the responsibilities summarized below:

Strategy — Review analyses and provide guidance and advice regarding acquisitions and divestments and discuss and review the Company’s tax strategies, planning, and related structures;

Capital — Review the Company’s capital structure and capital allocation, including organic and inorganic investments; review and discuss the Company’s dividend policy; and review and discuss share repurchase activities and plans; and

Securities and Financing — Review and discuss the Company’s debt portfolio, credit facilities, compliance with financial covenants, commodity, interest rate, and currency derivative strategies, and proposed securities offerings.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell35
Back to Contents

Other Governance Matters

Retirement Policy and Term Limits

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Rules for the Board of Directors provide that directors will not be re-nominated for election to the Board after they reach the age of 75. While the Board does not believe there is a specific age after which directors should no longer serve on boards, it does believe mandatory retirement ages are useful for promoting board refreshment; no waivers or exceptions to the rules have been granted and, since 2019, the Board has nominated five new directors to fill vacancies created by director retirements after reaching our mandatory retirement age.

The Board has not adopted term limits for its members. The Nominating and Governance Committee and the full Board regularly discuss board succession and refreshment and strive to maintain a balance of directors with varying lengths of service and ages. While the Board recognizes that term limits could assist in this regard, they may have the unintended consequence of causing the Board and the Company to lose the contribution of directors who over time have developed enhanced knowledge and valuable insight into the Company and its operations. The Board believes that the mandatory retirement age and an annual evaluation process for deciding whether to re-nominate individuals for election are currently more effective means of ensuring board refreshment and renewal, while also allowing for continuity of service.

Code of Conduct

In addition to a Code of Conduct for all employees and directors, the Company has a Financial Code of Ethics specifically for our CEO, CFO, CAO and persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Conduct covers a wide range of important topics including fair and accurate business dealings, corruption, health and safety, discrimination, and environmental protection. Copies of these codes can be found on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance.” Any waivers of the codes must be approved, in advance, by our Board, and any amendments to or waivers from the codes that apply to our executive officers and directors will be posted on the “Corporate Governance” section of our website.

We expect all employees to report possible violations or concerns regarding our Code of Conduct. We offer an independent whistleblower helpline and website, EthicsPoint, that enables employees and other stakeholders to report complaints anonymously. Our Chief Compliance Officer, who has a direct reporting line to the Audit Committee, provides regular reports to the Audit Committee on compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct, related training programs, and complaints received and investigated by the compliance function.

Public Policy & Political Engagement

We believe active participation in the political process is essential to our long-term success. LYB advances our public policy agenda through direct lobbying, involvement in various trade associations, and the LyondellBasell Political Action Committee (LYB PAC). Transparency and accountability are embedded into our public policy, political spending and lobbying actions. The Company maintains policies and procedures consistent with our Code of Conduct that support continued compliance with applicable political laws and regulations. Our engagement, including public policy advocacy directly and through trade associations, is subject to oversight by our senior management and CEO. In addition, the LYB PAC Board is responsible for the management of all LYB PAC activities, including the approval of all LYB PAC distributions.

LYB does not make direct political contributions to political parties or candidates using company resources (including monetary and in-kind services), even where permitted by law. All political contributions to political parties or candidates are made solely through the LYB PAC, which is funded and managed voluntarily by employees. All financial contributions strictly adhere to federal and state laws regarding contribution limits on amount and source, criteria and reporting requirements. We refrain from making political contributions in any country other than the United States. All political contributions are made without regard to the personal political affiliations or views of any individual employee at any level across the organization.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell36
Back to Contents

Our advocacy activities are directed toward advancing LYB’s business interests, to foster the protection and advancement of our operations and industries and not the personal political preferences of our executives or employees. LYB’s strategy is grounded in safe and reliable operation of all assets. Contributions are based upon advancing our business goals in a broad range of public policies, including, but not limited to: promoting a stable and predictable regulatory framework for our operations; advancing circularity initiatives, including recycling programs, extended producer responsibility regimes, and advanced and chemical recycling; fair and equitable tax policies that promote economic investment, job creation and global competitiveness; improving energy efficiency and sustainability programs, policies and activities; advancing innovation and technology in manufacturing; and improving work development programs to meet the needs of industry. Our contributions are consistent with the Company’s public policies on sustainability, advancing a circular economy and addressing climate change. Moreover, LYB policy prohibits directors and employees from using company resources for personal political causes or candidates, and specifies that LYB will not directly or indirectly reimburse any personal political contributions or expenses.

LYB has an established practice to determine which public policy issues are important to the Company. This process includes soliciting input from relevant business and functional departments. Key issues are discussed and prioritized by members of senior management.

In all of the Company’s advocacy activities, we are committed to corporate responsibility, compliance and transparency. In 2023, LYB published its first Climate Advocacy Report, which describes our approach to climate advocacy including detailing our climate policy positions, setting out our approach to participating in trade associations, and publishing our first-ever review and evaluation of trade association alignment with our climate policy positions. Our Climate Advocacy Report is available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Sustainability,” then “Reporting.” In addition, the Company discloses its U.S. federal, state and local lobbying activity and expenditures as required by law. More information, including our statement of Principles for Public Policy for Sustainability, is available on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Sustainability,” then “Public Policy & Political Engagement.”

Dutch Corporate Governance Code

As a Dutch incorporated entity, we are subject to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code. The Code, most recently amended in 2022 and a copy of which can be found at www.mccg.nl/english, is a statement of principles and best practices for Dutch companies with an emphasis on integrity, transparency, and accountability as the primary means of achieving good governance. The Code’s compliance principle is “comply-or-explain,” which permits a Dutch company to comply with the best practices outlined in the Code or explain why the company has chosen to apply different practices.

The principles and practices prescribed by the Code are largely consistent with NYSE and SEC requirements and best practices for U.S. companies. Our Dutch Annual Report, which accompanies our 2023 Dutch Annual Accounts and can be found on our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Investors,” then “Company Reports,” discloses those instances where we have chosen to apply practices that differ from the Code. In general, these instances arise from our decision to apply practices that are more common or appropriate for NYSE traded companies than those called for by the Code. For example, although the Board’s categorical standards for director independence incorporate the standards of both the Code and the NYSE, our Board has chosen to apply the standards of the NYSE where the two conflict, including with respect to the independence classification of directors nominated by Access Industries, a greater than 10% shareholder. Our Board believes that application of the NYSE independence standards is more appropriate for LYB, which is listed only on the NYSE and not on any exchange in the Netherlands. Our Board further believes that the service of Access nominees on the Company’s key independent committees provides those committees with shareholder perspective and the significant skills, experience, and qualifications of these directors, to the benefit of the Board, the Company, and our stakeholders more generally.

Indemnification

We indemnify members of our Board to the fullest extent permitted by law so they will be free from undue concern about personal liability in connection with their service to the Company. Our Articles of Association establish this indemnification right, and we have also entered into agreements with each of our directors contractually obligating us to indemnify them.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell37
Back to Contents

Director Compensation

Our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews director compensation on an annual basis and recommends any changes in compensation determined advisable. The Board seeks to award compensation that fairly compensates directors for the work required by membership on our Board and aligns director interests with those of our shareholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee periodically receives advice from Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), the Board’s independent compensation consultant, on director compensation practices and gives consideration to the qualifications and caliber of the Company’s directors and significant commitment required for service on our Board, including the additional time and effort required by overseas travel for many of our Board meetings.

Following its annual review in November 2023, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommended increasing the annual retainer for the Chair of the HSE&S Committee from $20,000 to $27,500, commensurate with the annual retainer for the Chairs of the Audit Committee and C&TD Committee. No other changes to director compensation were recommended, and the Board approved the updated director compensation policy effective January 1, 2024. No other increases to board retainers have been approved since 2014, apart from an increase in the annual retainer for the Board Chair in 2018.

Our non-executive directors receive cash compensation and equity compensation, in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), for their service on the Board and its committees. Members of the Board have the option to elect to receive all or a portion of the cash component of their compensation in Company shares. Our CEO does not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director.

Board RetainerCashRSUs
Chair of the Board$325,000$325,000
Members$115,000$170,000
 
Committee RetainersChairsMembers
Audit$27,500$15,000
Compensation & Talent Development$27,500$10,000
Nominating & Governance$20,000$10,000
Health, Safety, Environmental & Sustainability$27,500$10,000
Finance$20,000$10,000
 

In addition to the retainers shown above, we provide members of the Board with a cash payment of $5,000 for each intercontinental trip taken in performing board service.

Share Ownership Guidelines

Members of our Board are subject to Share Ownership Guidelines. Under the Share Ownership Guidelines, non-executive directors are prohibited from selling any shares of the Company until they own shares that are valued at no less than six times their annual cash retainer for Board service, or $690,000 for all directors other than our Chair, whose ownership requirement is $1,950,000. Under the guidelines, only shares beneficially owned and RSUs (net of the anticipated tax obligation on vesting, estimated for these purposes at 50%) count towards meeting the ownership thresholds. Once a director has reached his or her required ownership level, he or she may not sell shares that would bring ownership below the threshold level.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell38
Back to Contents

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging Shares

Pursuant to our Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading, directors are prohibited from purchasing, selling, or writing options on the Company’s shares, engaging in short sales, participating in other derivative or short-term purchase or sale transactions, or otherwise engaging in transactions that would enable them to hedge against any decrease in our share price. Directors are also prohibited from pledging Company shares as collateral for personal loans or other obligations, including holding shares in a brokerage margin account. These restrictions extend to directors’ immediate family members and certain related entities and are intended to keep the interests of our directors aligned with the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Director Compensation in 2023

Name Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(2)
         Stock Awards
($)(3)
         All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
         Total
($)
Jacques Aigrain 346,849 320,182 12,691 679,722
Lincoln Benet 145,000 167,474 5,000 317,474
Jagjeet Bindra(1) 57,123  15,188 72,311
Robin Buchanan 135,000 167,474  302,474
Tony Chase 70,000 247,899 13,856 331,755
Nance Dicciani(1) 20,890 42,626 10,188 73,704
Bob Dudley 135,000 167,474 20,000 322,474
Claire Farley 150,000 167,474 23,856 341,330
Rita Griffin(1) 90,178 169,510 15,000 274,688
Michael Hanley 152,500 167,474 24,600 344,574
Virginia Kamsky 135,000 167,474 24,724 327,198
Albert Manifold 141,041 167,474 5,000 313,515
(1)Mr. Bindra and Ms. Dicciani retired from the Board on May 19, 2023. Ms. Griffin was elected to the Board on May 19, 2023.
(2)Includes retainers for services earned or paid through December 31, 2023. Mr. Chase and Ms. Dicciani elected to receive a portion of the cash component of their compensation in the form of shares of our common stock.
(3)Represents annual grants of RSUs for all directors and shares of stock issued in lieu of cash compensation for Mr. Chase and Ms. Dicciani.
The annual grants of RSUs are made in conjunction with the Board’s regularly scheduled meeting in May of each year. The terms of the RSUs provide for vesting one year from the date of grant and for cash dividend equivalent payments when dividends are paid on the Company’s shares. In 2023, the annual grant for each continuing director, other than Mr. Aigrain and Ms. Griffin, was 1,860 units. Mr. Aigrain received 3,556 units, and Ms. Griffin received 1,865 units upon her election to the Board. These awards are the only stock awards outstanding at 2023 fiscal year-end for the non-executive directors. In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the grant date fair value of the awards is the number of units granted times the fair market value of our shares on that date. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 for a description of accounting for equity-based compensation.
The shares received in lieu of cash compensation are issued at the same time quarterly cash payments for retainers and travel fees are otherwise made. The number of shares issued is based on the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the quarter in which the compensation was earned. The shares issued in lieu of cash compensation in 2023 were as follows: Mr. Chase — 857 shares; Ms. Dicciani — 454 shares.
(4)Includes $5,000 for each intercontinental trip taken for work performed for the Company, other than Ms. Dicciani and Mr. Chase, who each elected to receive part of their travel fees in shares. Also includes benefits in kind related to tax preparation and advice related to the directors’ UK tax returns, payments and circumstances. The Company provides these services, through a third party, to members of our Board because of our unique incorporation and tax domicile situation. For Mr. Aigrain, also includes the approximate incremental cost to the Company for the personal use of Company aircraft by a family member travelling with Mr. Aigrain in 2023. Approximate incremental cost for travel on Company aircraft has been determined based on the total trip charge for each flight segment divided by the total number of passengers traveling on that segment.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell39
Back to Contents

Item 2
Discharge of Directors from Liability

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the discharge of our directors from liability for the performance of their duties in 2023.

Under Dutch law, shareholders may discharge the Company’s Board of Directors from liability in connection with the exercise of duties during the most recently completed fiscal year. The discharge does not affect any potential liability under the laws of The Netherlands relating to liability upon bankruptcy and does not extend to matters that have not been disclosed to shareholders. It is proposed that shareholders resolve to discharge the Company’s executive and non-executive directors in office in 2023 from liability in connection with the exercise of their respective duties during the year.

Item 3
Adoption of Dutch Statutory Annual Accounts

The Board recommends that you vote FORthe adoption of our 2023 Dutch statutory annual accounts.

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to adopt our Dutch statutory annual accounts for the year ended December 31, 2023, as required under Dutch law and our Articles of Association. Our Dutch statutory annual accounts are prepared in accordance with international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”) and Dutch law. A copy of the 2023 Dutch statutory annual accounts can be accessed through our website at www.LyondellBasell.com by clicking “Investors,” then “Company Reports,” and may be obtained free of charge by request to our Corporate Secretary at CorporateSecretary@LyondellBasell.com.

The Company paid an aggregate of $5.00 per share in dividends from its 2023 Dutch statutory annual accounts, for a total of approximately $1.6 billion. This includes interim dividends of $1.25 per share paid in each of the second, third and fourth quarters of 2023 and the first quarter of 2024.

Discussion of Dividend Policy

Pursuant to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, we provide shareholders with an opportunity to discuss our dividend policy and any major changes in that policy each year at our annual general meeting.

Our dividend policy continues to be to pay a consistent quarterly dividend, with the goal of increasing the dividend over time. Through March 31, 2024, we have paid an aggregate of approximately $23.2 billion in dividends since we began our dividend program in 2011, increasing the dividend payments from $0.10 per share in the second quarter of 2011 to the current rate of $1.25 per share. 2023 marked the Company’s thirteenth consecutive year of regular dividend growth. The Company’s strong balance sheet and results of operations support the continuation of this quarterly dividend program.

Pursuant to our Articles of Association, the Board has determined the amount, if any, out of our annual profits to be allocated to reserves prior to the payment of dividends. The portion of our annual profits that remains after the reservation is available for dividend payments as approved by shareholders. The determination to pay any dividends will be made after a review of the Company’s expected earnings, the economic environment, financial position, and prospects of the Company, and any other considerations deemed relevant by the Board.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell40
Back to Contents

Item 4
Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. as the Auditor of our Dutch Statutory Annual Accounts

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. (“PwC N.V.”) as the auditor of our 2024 Dutch statutory annual accounts.

The Board has selected PwC N.V. to serve as the auditor of our Dutch statutory annual accounts to be prepared in accordance with IFRS for the year ending December 31, 2024, and, in accordance with our Articles of Association, we are requesting that shareholders appoint PwC N.V. as auditor of such annual accounts. PwC N.V. has acted as the auditor of our Dutch statutory annual accounts since 2010. The Audit Committee also follows SEC rules and PwC policy regarding lead audit partner rotation. During 2021, a new lead audit partner was selected for the Company. Representatives of PwC N.V. will be present at the Annual Meeting and may be questioned by shareholders in relation to PwC N.V.’s report on the fairness of the financial statements.

Item 5
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024.

The Board has selected PwC to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024. PwC has acted as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2010.

The Audit Committee, which annually recommends selection of the Company’s independent accountants, reviews PwC’s performance and independence on an ongoing basis and considers a number of factors in determining whether to re-engage PwC for the following year. The factors considered include, among others:

the quality of the audit conducted and service provided;
the qualifications and performance of the lead audit partner;
the length of time PwC has served in the roles; and
the reasonableness of fees charged.

The Audit Committee also follows SEC rules and PwC policy regarding lead audit partner rotation. During 2021, a new lead audit partner was selected for the Company following meetings between the candidate and the Chair of the Audit Committee and Company management.

The Audit Committee believes the continued retention of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024 is in the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell41
Back to Contents

Although shareholder ratification of the selection of PwC is not required, our Board is submitting the selection to shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’s auditors. If our shareholders fail to ratify the selection of PwC, it will be considered as notice to the Board and Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may recommend that the Board select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders.

Representatives of PwC are not expected to attend the Annual Meeting; however, representatives of PwC N.V., the auditor of the Company’s Dutch statutory annual accounts, will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to respond to appropriate shareholder questions and make a statement if they desire to do so.

Professional Services Fee Information

Fees for professional services provided by PwC in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories, were as follows:

(in millions) 2023           2022
Audit Fees$               12.1 $               11.0
Audit-Related Fees 2.3  0.9
Tax Fees 0.6  0.9
All Other Fees 2.6  
TOTAL$17.6 $12.8

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed or expected to be billed for professional services rendered by PwC for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, the review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by an independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, and consents.

Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance of its audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported as audit fees herein. This category includes fees related to audits of benefit plans; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures relating to accounting records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting, or regulatory reporting requirements; and consultations as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards, or interpretations by regulatory or standard-setting bodies.

Tax fees consist of international tax compliance and corporate tax consulting.

All other fees consist of fees paid for services provided by PwC that are not included in the audit, audit-related, and tax categories. Such services include licensing of technical accounting libraries and tools and other permissible advisory, consulting and outsourcing services.

The Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the approval of PwC’s services and related fees. Each year, the Audit Committee discusses the scope of the audit plan with PwC and all audit and audit-related services, tax services, and other services for the upcoming fiscal year are provided to the Audit Committee for pre-approval. The services, which may be provided in the upcoming twelve-month period, are grouped into significant categories substantially in the format shown above.

The Audit Committee is updated on the status of all PwC services and related fees on a periodic basis or more frequently as matters warrant. In 2023 and 2022, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related, tax and other services performed by PwC. As set forth in the Audit Committee Report below, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services by PwC is compatible with maintaining auditor independence and has determined in the affirmative with respect to the services provided in 2023.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell42
Back to Contents

Audit Committee Report

The role of the Audit Committee is, among other things, to oversee the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Supervisory Board, to recommend to the Supervisory Board whether the Company’s financial statements should be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Annual Report”), and to select and

nominate the Company’s independent auditor for appointmentratification by shareholders. Company management is responsible for the Company’s financial statements as well as for its financial reporting process, accounting principles, and internal controls. The Company’s independent auditors areauditor is responsible for performing an audit of the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to the conformity of such financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s audited financial statements as offiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and for2023. In addition, the 12 month period then ended, andAudit Committee has taken the following steps in making its recommendation that the Company’s financial statements be included in its annual report:the Annual Report:

 

Discussed with PwC, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for period ended December 31, 2015, those matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit. These communications and discussions are intended to assist the Audit Committee in overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process.

First, the Audit Committee discussed with PwC those matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the SEC, including information regarding the scope and results of the audit. These communications and discussions are intended to assist the Audit Committee in overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process.
Second, the Audit Committee discussed with PwC its independence and received from PwC the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwC’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. This discussion and disclosure helped the Audit Committee in evaluating such independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether, and concluded that, PwC’s provision of other non-audit services to the Company is compatible with the auditor’s independence.
Third, the Audit Committee met periodically with members of management, including the head of the Company’s internal audit and internal controls functions, and PwC to review and discuss internal control over financial reporting. Further, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed management’s report on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, as well as PwC’s report regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Finally, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management and PwC the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, including the acceptability and appropriateness of the accounting principles applied, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of the disclosure.

 

Discussed with PwC its independence, including communications PwC is required to provide us under applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requirements. This discussion and disclosure helped the Audit Committee in evaluating such independence.

Met periodically with members of management, the internal auditors and PwC to review and discuss internal controls over financial reporting.

Reviewed and discussed, with the Company’s management and PwC, the Company’s audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, and consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the 12 month period ended December 31, 2015, including the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of the disclosure.

The Audit Committee has also discussed with the head of the Company’s internal auditorsaudit department and independent registered public accounting firmPwC the overall scope and plans of their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets periodically with both the head of the internal auditorsaudit department and the independent registered public accounting firm,PwC, with and without Company management present, to discuss the results of their examinations and their respective evaluations of the Company’s internal controls.control over financial reporting.

The members of the Audit Committee are not engaged in the accounting or auditing profession and, consequently, are not experts in matters involving auditing or accounting.

In the performance of their oversight function, the members of the Audit Committee necessarily relied upon the information, opinions, reports, and statements presented to them by Company management and by PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Based on the reviews and discussions explained above (and without other independent verification), the Audit Committee recommended to the Supervisory Board of Directors (and the Supervisory Board of Directors approved) that the Company’s financial statements be included in its annual report for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.the Annual Report. The Audit Committee has also approved the selection of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016.2024.

The Audit Committee

Michael Hanley, Chair
Jacques Aigrain
Tony Chase
Claire Farley

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell43
Back to Contents

Item 6
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-On-Pay)

The Board recommends that you vote FORthe approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.

We believe that LYB’s executive compensation program supports our executive compensation philosophy and goals, drives performance, encourages an appropriate sensitivity to risk, and increases shareholder value. Our philosophy, which is set by the C&TD Committee, is intended to align each executive’s compensation with the Company’s short-term and long-term performance and to provide the compensation and incentives needed to attract, motivate, and retain high-caliber executives who are crucial to our long-term success.

A significant portion of the Supervisorytotal compensation opportunity for each of our executives is directly tied to the Company’s progress against our strategic, operating, sustainability and safety goals.

We implement our philosophy and achieve our program goals by following certain key principles, including:

positioning total direct compensation and each individual element of executive compensation near the median of our peer group companies, with consideration given to the relative complexity of comparable executive roles;
aligning short-term incentive awards with annual operating, financial, and strategic objectives, while taking into account the realities of a cyclical industry and rewarding differential performance rather than favorable or unfavorable market circumstances; and
rewarding absolute and relative performance over time through long-term equity incentive awards.

Results of Last Year’s Say-On-Pay Vote

Our executive compensation program received substantial shareholder support and was approved, on an advisory basis, by approximately 98% of votes cast at the 2023 annual general meeting of shareholders. Our C&TD Committee and Board believe this level of approval of our executive compensation program demonstrates our shareholders’ strong support of our compensation philosophy and goals and the decisions made by the C&TD Committee. They also believe the consistently high level of shareholder support for our executive compensation is a result of our C&TD Committee’s commitment to compensating our executives in a manner that ensures a strong link between pay and performance and is reflective of our philosophy and goals, market best practices, and strong shareholder engagement.

Bruce A. Smith,Chairman

Pay for Performance in 2023

Jacques Aigrain

Nance K. Dicciani

Bella Goren

Compensation Committee

The current membersC&TD Committee believes that the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2023 is reasonable, appropriate, and supported by the Company’s performance. The C&TD Committee works to ensure management’s interests align with increasing shareholder value. The Board requests that you consider the structure of our executive compensation program in connection with our 2023 performance, which is more fully discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this proxy statement that follows. The CD&A explains how we implement our compensation philosophy and goals and how we apply these principles to our compensation program. For additional information, see the section of this proxy statement titled “Pay Versus Performance” on page 80.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell44
Back to Contents

2024 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are requesting that shareholders vote on an advisory basis to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers in 2023, as described in this proxy statement. Shareholders have the opportunity to share their opinion regarding our executive compensation program by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2024 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and other related tables and disclosure.”

Although the advisory vote is non-binding, the Board values our shareholders’ opinions. The C&TD Committee are Messrs. Aigrain (Chairman), Benetwill review the results of the vote and Carrollconsider shareholders’ input when considering future decisions regarding our executive compensation programs. If you have concerns relating to our executive compensation programs, we encourage you to contact us because a vote against this proposal will not provide the C&TD Committee with information about shareholders’ specific concerns.

The Company provides for annual say-on-pay votes, and Ms. Goren. Each member is independent inthe next say-on-pay vote will occur at our 2025 annual general meeting of shareholders. In accordance with SEC rules, shareholders will be given an opportunity to express their views on whether the rulespractice of annual say-on-pay votes should be maintained at our 2029 annual general meeting of shareholders.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell45
Back to Contents

Compensation Discussion and regulationsAnalysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY47
2023 Performance Highlights47
Key Compensation Practices48
Say-on-Pay and Shareholder Outreach48
Noteworthy C&TD Committee Actions Since January 202349
WHAT GUIDES OUR PROGRAM50
Executive Compensation Philosophy50
Components of Executive Compensation50
Compensation Mix51
The Decision-Making Process51
Competitive Positioning and Our Peer Group52
2023 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS IN DETAIL53
2023 Base Salaries53
2023 Annual Bonus Payments53
2023 Long-Term Incentives58
Payout of One-Time Cash Retention Awards58
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION61

This section explains the decisions made concerning the compensation of the NYSE.Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) for fiscal year 2023. It also describes the Company’s compensation philosophy, our executive compensation program, the process our C&TD Committee followed, and the factors the C&TD Committee considered in determining the amount of compensation awarded. Our NEOs for 2023 are Peter Vanacker, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; Michael McMurray, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer; and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company in 2023. Their titles are provided below.

Peter Vanacker

CEO

Michael McMurray

EVP and Chief Financial
Officer

Ken Lane

Former EVP – Global
Olefins & Polyolefins
and Procurement
(1)

Jim Guilfoyle

SVP – Olefins &
Polyolefins EAMEI

Torkel Rhenman

EVP – Advanced
Polymer Solutions

(1)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024. Ms. Kimberly Foley has succeeded Mr. Lane as our EVP, Global Olefins & Polyolefins, Refining and Supply Chain, and Mr. Aaron Ledet has been promoted to the role of EVP, Intermediates and Derivatives, effective March 1, 2024.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell46
Back to Contents

Executive Summary

2023 Performance Highlights

$2.1 B$5.2 B$4.9 B$1.8 B
Net IncomeEBITDA ex. Identified Items(1)Cash from Operating ActivitiesReturned to Shareholders

In 2023, the Company delivered outstanding cash conversion amid challenging market conditions. Despite soft global demand, capacity additions and economic uncertainty, our businesses delivered $4.9 billion in cash from operating activities. We also continued our track record of delivering significant returns to shareholders, marking our thirteenth consecutive year of annual dividend growth and returning $1.8 billion to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Implementing our new strategy. Last year, we launched our three-pillar strategy to create a more profitable and sustainable growth engine for LYB. Our strategy focuses on three initiatives: (1) Growing and upgrading the core; (2) Building a profitable CLCS business; and (3) Stepping up performance and culture.

One year after launch, we are making significant progress on each pillar. In March 2023, we successfully started up the world’s largest propylene oxide and tertiary butyl alcohol unit in Texas, which enables us to meet the growing demand for essential products. In addition, in early 2024 we entered into an agreement for a new propylene and polypropylene joint venture in Saudi Arabia. This year, we will continue to focus on efficiently growing and upgrading our core through decisive portfolio management, including the divestiture of our ethylene oxide and derivatives business. Following our final investment decision in 2023, we will also move forward on engineering and construction of our first advanced recycling plant using LYB’s proprietary MoReTec technology.

Throughout the year, we built strong foundations for our CLCS business by making significant investments to secure feedstock supply, expand our recycling footprint and develop scalable technologies to support the reduction of plastic waste in the environment through the use of recycled content as a material feedstock. We formed joint ventures to build plastics recycling infrastructure in Europe, Asia, and North America. We also announced our decision to build the first advanced recycling plant using our proprietary MoReTec technology.

As we rapidly move forward on our new strategy, we are unlocking additional value by stepping up our performance and culture. One year after launching our Value Enhancement Program (VEP), we delivered a year-end run rate of more than $300 million of net income(2) and $400 million in recurring annual EBITDA(2), more than doubling our original target for 2023.

Progressing on our climate and sustainability goals. We remain committed to our climate and sustainability goals. In 2023, we built strong foundations for our CLCS business by forming partnerships to source and sort plastic waste while moving forward on our first tranche of advanced recycling capacity. We rapidly achieved nearly 90% of our goal to procure half of our electricity from renewable sources and issued our inaugural $500 million green bond to help advance the Company’s long-term sustainability goals.

Safety. In 2023, we continued to prioritize safety. We achieved a total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”) of 0.139 and a process safety incident rate (“PSIR”) of 0.035. Additionally, 60 of our manufacturing sites achieved GoalZERO (zero injuries, zero incidents and zero accidents), and 67 manufacturing sites were injury-free.

Pay for Performance. The Company paid 2023 annual bonuses at 127% of target, in recognition of our resilient results, rapid progress towards our Value Enhancement Program targets, strong safety performance and achievement of key sustainability milestones. There was 200% payout under the Company’s PSUs for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2023 reflecting the fact that the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) fell in the top quartile of selected peers and the Company’s free cash flow (“FCF”) per share exceeded the target set by our C&TD Committee. The performance metrics under the Company’s annual bonus program and PSUs are further described under “2023 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail.” Our executives’ annual bonuses, including their individual performance ratings, will continue to reflect safety performance and support for our climate, circularity and DEI initiatives.

(1)See Appendix A for information about our non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA, including and excluding identified items. Identified items include adjustments for impairments and refinery exit costs.
(2)VEP goals are estimated based on 2017-2019 mid-cycle margins and modest inflation relative to a 2021 baseline.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell47
Back to Contents

Key Compensation Practices

Our executive compensation practices support our pay for performance philosophy, align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders, and reflect best governance without encouraging unnecessary risk-taking.

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

    Pay for performance. We tie a significant amount of compensation to our financial, business, strategic, and ESG goals.

    Emphasize long-term performance. We balance long-term and short-term incentives and use long-term equity incentive awards, including PSUs, RSUs, and stock options, to reward sustained long-term performance.

    Double-trigger vesting. We provide for “double-trigger” vesting in connection with any change-in-control event.

    Clawbacks. We have a robust clawback policy so we can recover performance-based compensation in certain circumstances.

    Share ownership guidelines. We restrict our executives’ and directors’ ability to sell shares unless they first meet robust share ownership guidelines. We do not count PSUs or stock options toward compliance with these guidelines.

    Independent compensation consultant. We engage an independent consultant to advise on executive compensation matters, and our independent C&TD Committee meets regularly with the consultant in executive session.

    Peer group benchmarking. We use appropriate peer groups when establishing compensation.

    Annual say-on-pay. We hold an annual say-on-pay advisory vote.

    Excise tax gross-ups. We do not provide for excise tax gross-ups in connection with change-in-control events or terminations.

    Hedging or pledging. We do not allow our officers and directors to hedge or pledge our stock.

    Guaranteed bonuses. We do not pay guaranteed bonuses.

    Automatic compensation increases. We do not automatically increase executive base salaries each year or make lock-step changes in compensation based on peer group compensation levels or metrics.

    Reprice or exchange underwater options. We do not permit option repricing or the buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval.

Say-on-Pay and Shareholder Outreach

Our executive compensation program has received substantial and consistent shareholder support over the past several years. At the 2021, 2022, and 2023 annual general meeting of shareholders, approximately 97%, 97%, and 98% of votes were cast in favor of our executive compensation program, respectively. Our C&TD Committee and Board believe that the consistent high level of support from our shareholders is a result of our commitment to ensuring that our executives are compensated in a manner that provides a strong link between pay and performance.

The CompensationC&TD Committee met four times in 2015. The Compensationand Board value our shareholders’ insights and are committed to ongoing, regular dialogue with shareholders regarding executive compensation, among other matters. We consider shareholder feedback, evolving business needs, and our desire to maintain a strong link between executive pay and performance when evaluating our compensation program.

Recent Shareholder Support for Say-on-Pay
97%97%98%
202120222023

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell48
Back to Contents

Noteworthy C&TD Committee Actions Since January 2023

Our C&TD Committee is responsible for overseeingdetermining the compensation of our executive officers and designing our executive compensation programsprogram. The Committee, together with its independent compensation consultant, continually reviews compensation trends and developingbest practices, discusses shareholder and employee feedback on the Company’s compensation philosophy generally. As partprograms, and considers the Company’s talent development goals and business needs. Since January 1, 2023, the Committee and the Board of its function, the Compensation Committee reports the results of its activitiesDirectors took several noteworthy actions in relation to the full Supervisory Board. The Compensation Committee’s written charter,Company’s compensation programs:

2023 STI Program Highlights – Value Enhancement Metric

For the 2023 STI program, the C&TD Committee replaced the fixed cost metric with a new value creation metric, which aligns executive compensation with the Company’s evolving strategy and vision. While thoughtful capital allocation remains an integral part of our culture, the 2023 incentive plan design emphasizes the Company’s increased focus on capturing value, improving agility and accelerating innovation.

Payout under the value creation metric is determined by the achievement of incremental EBITDA targets supporting our goal of delivering up to $1 billion in recurring annual EBITDA improvement by the end of 2025.

One year after launching our VEP, we have exceeded our original 2023 recurring annual EBITDA target of $150 million(1), and are on track to deliver on our goal of up to $1 billion of recurring annual EBITDA(1) improvement by the end of 2025. For a reconciliation of recurring annual EBITDA to the nearest GAAP financial measure, see Appendix A.

Continued Focus on Safety and Sustainability

For 2023, ESG metrics continued to account for 30% of the total payout under the STI program (20% Safety and 10% Sustainability), reflecting the Company’s ongoing commitment to safety, accountability and timely delivery of our climate and circularity goals. 

Safety. In 2023, we continued to prioritize safety. Our total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”) was 0.139, and our process safety incident rate (“PSIR”) was 0.035. 60 of our manufacturing sites achieved GoalZERO, and 67 manufacturing sites were injury-free.

Sustainability. Under our sustainability metric, payout is based on the accomplishment of key milestones approved by the Supervisory Board,C&TD Committee. We believe that the sustainability metric incentivizes accountability and timely delivery of our climate and circularity goals. For 2023, we focused on three milestones: (1) execute Power Purchase Agreements with cumulative volume from January 1, 2022 of 700 GW of renewable electricity capacity; (2) leverage transformation projects to improve energy efficiency by 1% from a 2021 baseline; and (3) produce and market 150kt of recycled and renewable-based polymers in 2023.(2) Target performance levels for each milestone are summarized under “—2023 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail—2023 Annual Bonus Payments—Company Performance” on page 53.

Change to STI Formula

For the 2023 STI program, the C&TD Committee modified the formula for calculating executive STI payments to eliminate the Corporate Score component of the Individual Performance Score for non-CEO executives. The C&TD Committee believes this change reinforces individual accountability, contributions, and ownership.

(1)Year-end run-rate is estimated based on 2017-2019 mid-cycle margins and modest inflation relative to a 2021 baseline.
(2)Production and marketing includes (i) joint venture production marketed by LYB plus our pro rata share of the remaining production produced and marketed by the joint venture, and (ii) production via third-party tolling arrangements.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell49
Back to Contents

What Guides our Program

Executive Compensation Philosophy 

Our executive compensation program is designed to:

Take into account the realities of a cyclical, commodity industry and reward differential performance
Align the interests of management with those of our shareholders
Encourage both short-term and long-term results
Attract, retain, and incentivize the highest caliber team possible
Enable us to pay high achievers above-market median compensation based on individual performance, potential, and impact to the Company’s results
Recognize and maintain the Company’s market-leading position in health and safety
Emphasize the Company’s deep commitment to sustainability and increase focus on value creation

Components of Executive Compensation

Our compensation program is structured to incorporate the following compensation components:

ComponentKey FeaturesPerformance-Based

Base Salaries

Provide a regular fixed income in recognition of job responsibilities

Determined when executives are hired or promoted into their position and reviewed annuallyIndividual performance is a key driver of any annual base salary adjustment. Increases are not guaranteed and must be approved by the C&TD Committee

Short-Term Incentives (STI)

Incentivize executives by aligning their compensation with key annual objectives and the results that are achieved

Target value of annual bonus is determined as a percentage of base salary. Executives earn from 0 to 200% of target based on Company results and (for executives other than the CEO) individual performancePayout is determined by the C&TD Committee based on corporate performance and achievement of individual goals

Long-Term Incentives (LTI)

Encourage executives to increase shareholder value over the long term and support talent retention

Target value of LTI awards at grant is determined as a percentage of base salary

PSUs – three-year performance period, vest from 0 to 200% of target; PSUs will consist 60% of the executive's target award in 2024 and beyond

RSUs – for RSUs granted in 2023 and earlier, cliff vest after three years; RSUs granted in 2024 and beyond will consist 40% of the executive’s target award and vest ratably over three years

Options – for options granted in 2023 and earlier, vest ratably over three years, expire ten years from grant, exercise price is fair market value at date of grant; options will no longer be part of the LTI program in 2024 and beyond.

Value of all LTI awards varies in relationship to changes in share price

PSUs pay out based on Company performance, as determined by the C&TD Committee

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell50
Back to Contents

Compensation Mix 

Our executive compensation program emphasizes the alignment of pay with performance and shareholder value creation, and the mix of compensation components for our NEOs is heavily weighted toward performance-based and variable compensation. Our CEO’s compensation package emphasizes performance-based and variable compensation even more than those of the other NEOs to reflect the fact that the CEO’s actions have the greatest influence on the Company’s overall performance. For 2023, the Total Target Direct Compensation (“TTDC”) of our NEOs was as follows: 

The Decision-Making Process 

The C&TD Committee oversees our executive compensation program, working closely with its independent consultant to ensure the effectiveness of the program throughout the year. Details of the C&TD Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in its charter, which can be found on our website at www.lyb.com.

In overseeing compensation matters, the Compensation Committee may delegate authority for day-to-day administration and interpretationwww.LyondellBasell.com by clicking on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance,” then “Board of the Company’s plans to Company employees, including selection of participants, determination of award levels within plan parameters, and approval of award documents. However, the Compensation Committee may not delegate authority under those plans for matters affecting the compensation and benefits of the executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include the following:Directors.” 

 

Responsible PartyPrimary Roles and Responsibilities
C&TD Committee 
(100% independent directors)

Responsible for determining the compensation of our executive officers (including the NEOs) and designing our executive compensation program

With input from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, annually conducts a comprehensive analysis and assessment of our executive compensation program, including an evaluation of each component of target compensation for our executive officers, and approves TTDC for the coming year

Approves performance metrics and target performance levels for the Company’s STI program and performance-based equity grants, after receiving input from management and other committees

Other Independent Members of Board of Directors

Non-executive members of the Board, including the Chair, review and provide input on the C&TD Committee’s decisions relating to the compensation of our executive officers

HSE&S Committee provides input regarding the design and payout for annual safety and sustainability performance metrics

Chief Executive Officer

Each year, presents the C&TD Committee with recommendations regarding the compensation of each of the other executive officers (including the other NEOs). These recommendations are based on his assessment of each executive’s performance, the performance of the executive’s business unit or function, benchmark information, and retention risk

Provides input on the overall executive compensation program design

The C&TD Committee reviews CEO recommendations and makes adjustments as it deems appropriate. The CEO does not have any role in the Committee’s determination of his own compensation

Independent Compensation -Consultant (Pearl Meyer) Approve

Retained by the C&TD Committee, after assessment of the firm’s independence and determining that the engagement of Pearl Meyer did not raise any conflict of interest or other concerns, to provide advice regarding executive compensation matters

Advises on the design of our executive compensation program and benefitsevolving industry practices

Provides market data and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our executive officers;compensation program

Evaluates proposed compensation decisions and program updates.

Attends regularly-scheduled meetings of the C&TD Committee and telephone conferences with members of the Committee or its Chair throughout the year to assist with the review objectivesand discussion of executive compensation consistent with corporate objectives; review and approve goals and objectives of CEO compensation and evaluate CEO performance; and make recommendations to the Supervisory Board for all executive officers’ compensation;matters

 

 
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell51
Back to Contents

Competitive Positioning and Our Peer Group 

Annually, the C&TD Committee reviews the TTDC for each of our executive officers, which includes base salaries, target bonuses, and the grant date value of long-term incentive awards. The Committee strives to set our NEOs’ TTDC and each individual component of executive compensation near the median compensation levels of our peer group companies, while considering other factors described below. A large portion of the TTDC opportunity for our NEOs is directly tied to the achievement of financial and operational metrics that measure our performance in both absolute terms and relative to peers.

The Committee reviews publicly available financial and compensation information reported by our peer group companies (described below) and general survey data. The survey data used to inform the Committee’s 2023 compensation decisions was collected from the 2022 Willis Towers Watson Executive Compensation Database. This survey data reflects a combination of general industry and chemical industry compensation for executives with responsibilities similar to those of our executives.

The Committee reviews the peer group and survey data to determine the median compensation for each executive’s position and then sets each executive’s base salary and compensation targets for the current year. This generally involves establishing an annual bonus target and the target value of LTI awards as a percentage of base salary. Median compensation is used as a reference point for pay recommendations. Actual pay and targets vary from median based on the executive’s industry experience; experience and performance in his or her role and at the Company; value of the role to the Company; internal pay parity among our executives; and any other factors the Committee deems relevant.

The compensation peer group is also used more generally when the Committee reviews our compensation program design, including the types of compensation awarded and the terms and conditions of compensation components.

Our 2023 Peer Group

The C&TD Committee conducts an annual review of the Company’s executive compensation peer group to determine if any changes are necessary. In choosing our peers, the Committee involves management and uses research and advice from the Committee’s independent compensation consultant and considers companies that operate in similar industries or are identified as potential competitors for business or talent, with consideration given to company size and comparability of financial, operating and business considerations.

The C&TD Committee believes the 18-company peer group below represents a reasonable balance in terms of industry mix and financial size while providing a robust set of data points for benchmarking executive pay. In September 2022, the Committee reviewed and approved continuing to use the 2022 peer group for 2023.

3M Company
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 
Caterpillar Inc.
Cummins Inc.
Deere & Company
Dow Inc.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
General Dynamics Corporation 
HF Sinclair Corporation
Honeywell International Inc.
International Paper Company
Johnson Controls International
Linde plc
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
Phillips 66
PPG Industries, Inc.
The Sherwin-Williams Company 
Valero Energy Corporation

The 2023 peer group reported 2023 revenue that ranged from approximately $12.1 billion to $148.4 billion, with a median revenue of approximately $35.4 billion. In comparison, the Company’s 2023 revenue was approximately $41.1 billion. The 2023 peer group was used to develop the market data and benchmarking materials that were provided to the C&TD Committee to assist with the 2023 decision-making process.

 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell52
Back to Contents

2023 Executive Compensation Decisions in Detail

The compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, is reviewed and approved by the C&TD Committee at the time of each executive’s hiring or promotion and annually during a regularly scheduled meeting held in February. Decisions are made based on the Company’s and each executive’s performance in the prior year, other than with respect to PSU payouts, for which decisions are based on Company performance over a three-year period. February 2023 compensation decisions included the approval of 2023 base salaries; target values, criteria and metrics for the 2023 annual bonuses to be paid in 2024; and 2023 grants of annual long-term incentive awards, including PSUs, RSUs and stock options, as described on pages 58-59. In February 2024, the Committee approved payout of 2023 annual bonuses and the percentage earned for the PSUs granted in 2021 with a performance period that ended December 31, 2023.
 

2023 Base Salaries 

The table below shows the base salaries for our NEOs in 2022 and 2023. Salary changes are generally approved at the C&TD Committee’s February meeting and effective on April 1. The Committee reviews market data and considers internal pay parity when making its decisions. The Committee also considers each executive’s performance during the prior year, any changes in responsibilities, and the executive’s time in role. The 2023 salary increases for Messrs. Vanacker, McMurray and Rhenman, each effective April 1, 2023, represented annual salary adjustments to maintain market competitiveness.

Name2022 Base2023 BaseIncrease 
Peter Vanacker$1,400,000$1,450,0004% 
Michael McMurray$824,000$850,0003% 
Ken Lane(1)$870,000$870,000— 
Jim Guilfoyle$793,100$793,100— 
Torkel Rhenman$793,100$800,0001% 
(1)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024.

2023 Annual Bonus Payments 

The Company’s annual bonus program rewards participants for achieving the Company’s annual objectives. Under this short-term incentive, or STI, program, the C&TD Committee establishes metrics and target performance levels and sets a target bonus, determined as a percentage of base salary, for each executive. In 2023, our NEOs’ target bonuses were as follows.

Name2023 Target Bonus 
(% of salary) 
Peter Vanacker160% 
Michael McMurray95% 
Ken Lane(1)95% 
Jim Guilfoyle95% 
Torkel Rhenman95% 
(1)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024.

The amount of target bonus earned depends on the C&TD Committee’s determination of Company and individual performance under each of the STI program metrics. STI awards for 2023 were calculated in the same manner as in prior years, except the calculation of the Individual Performance Score no longer includes the Corporate Score component.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell53
Back to Contents

Company Performance – Payout at 127% of Target

Payout for the Company performance component of the 2023 STI award was based on achievement of target performance levels for four metrics: business results, value creation, safety performance, and sustainability, weighted as described below. 

(1)The Company Compensation Benefits - Review compensation philosophy, programsperformance component of Mr. Guilfoyle’s STI payout is based 60% on Company performance and practices; review40% on his award unit performance.
(2)Mr. Vanacker’s STI payouts are based entirely on Company performance. There is no individual performance component for the CEO.
(3)Overall payout under the STI program will not exceed 200% of an individual’s target bonus.
(4)Production and approve pensionmarketing includes (i) joint venture production marketed by LYB plus our pro rata share of the remaining production produced and benefit arrangements as well as funding of pensionmarketed by the joint venture, and benefit plans; and make recommendations to the Supervisory Board regarding the same; and

(ii) production via third-party tolling arrangements.

 

 
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell54
Back to Contents
Business Results (60%)
WHY EBITDA?
We believe that EBITDA is the financial measure that best enables shareholders to gauge our profitability and assess our business results. We determine performance under this metric by comparing EBITDA to our annual EBITDA budget, after making certain non-discretionary adjustments at the end of the year to account for market tailwinds and headwinds. Our aim is to ensure that our compensation rewards differential rather than circumstantial performance. These adjustments are reviewed in detail with, and approved by, the C&TD Committee to ensure they are rigorous and support the alignment of pay and performance.

The C&TD Committee considers the Company’s EBITDA relative to the adjusted EBITDA budget. Payout at 126% of target was based on 2023 EBITDA that came in above the Company’s adjusted EBITDA budget for the year by 3.9%.

EBITDA Budget Adjustments

At its regularly scheduled 2023 November meeting, the Board reviewed the Company’s annual EBITDA budget for the coming year and, the following February, approved the final annual STI EBITDA target. After completion of the year, and in order to ensure that our executives are compensated on the basis of differential rather than circumstantial performance, the Company’s EBITDA budget may be adjusted in three primary ways. These adjustments can increase the EBITDA budget in an upcycle or lower the budget in a downturn and are used as a tool to ensure the Committee pays for actual performance, not performance due to the volatility and cyclicality of the chemicals industry, which is heavily influenced by energy prices.

Specifically, these adjustments account for (i) differences between actual market margins or spreads and budget assumptions, (ii) movements in foreign-exchange rates, the mark-to-market of certain assets (e.g., precious metals), and the same fixed cost exclusions taken into account when measuring the Company’s cost performance, and (iii) the budget impact of significant unanticipated events. All adjustments are reviewed and approved by the C&TD Committee and are subject to certain thresholds before an adjustment will be considered.

Adjustments for actual market margins or spreads are calculated using independent third-party sources whenever available, including IHS Markit (IHS) and Phillip Townsend Associates (PTAI). No market adjustments are made for businesses that do not have market references, including our Advanced Polymer Solutions (APS) and Technology segments. In 2023, additional adjustments were made for the costs incurred from plans to exit the refinery business.

The table below summarizes the approved adjustments, both positive and negative, to the Company’s 2023 EBITDA budget by segment, which collectively decreased the EBITDA budget by 4%. To avoid disclosing competitively-sensitive information, we do not provide specific details on market impacts.

Segment(s)Description of EBITDA Budget Adjustments
Olefins & Polyolefins – AmericasEthylene cash margin (IHS), polyethylene spread (PTAI), and polypropylene spread (PTAI)
Olefins & Polyolefins – Europe, Asia, InternationalEU ethylene variable margin (typical naphtha cracker), polyethylene spread (PTAI), and polypropylene spread (PTAI)
Intermediates & DerivativesU.S. methanol variable margin (IHS), styrene raw material margin (IHS), NA MTBE raw material margin (IHS) and EU MTBE raw material margin (IHS)
RefiningMaya 2-1-1 crack spread, net of RINs and co-product spread, costs incurred from plans to exit the refining business
AllForeign-exchange rate impacts, mark-to-market adjustments, and fixed cost exclusions
Net EBITDA Budget Impact4%

We define EBITDA as Income from continuing operations before interest expense (net), provision for (benefit from) income taxes and depreciation and amortization. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income for the year ended December 31, 2023, please refer to Appendix A. At the C&TD Committee’s discretion, the Company’s annual EBITDA results may be adjusted for the impact of certain extraordinary events during the year. For 2023, approved EBITDA adjustments included costs incurred due to plans to exit the refinery business and impairments made to tangible assets in our global O&P and I&D segments and intangible assets in our APS segment.

 

Administrative - Perform an annual self-evaluation.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell55
Back to Contents
Value Creation (10%)
WHY VALUE CREATION? 
We believe in aligning executive compensation with the Company’s evolving strategy and vision, which focuses on capturing value, improving agility and accelerating innovation. We believe our value creation metric incentivizes employees to bring forth new financial value creating ideas and initiatives in line with our new culture. 

Payout under the value creation metric is determined by the achievement of incremental EBITDA targets supporting our goal of delivering up to $1 billion in recurring annual EBITDA improvement by the end of 2025. Payout at 200% of target reflects the Company exceeding our original 2023 recurring annual EBITDA exit run-rate target of $150 million, bringing us closer to delivering on our long-term VEP goal.

Safety Performance (20%)
WHY SAFETY PERFORMANCE? 
Operating in a safe, reliable manner protects our employees, our assets, and the communities in which we operate. We believe our focus on safety performance is the right thing to do, and it helps contain costs of operations and avoid operational upsets and reputational harm.

The C&TD Committee primarily considers the Company’s performance in personal safety (50%) and process safety (50%) and has discretion to adjust the resulting payout to account for environmental incidents and extraordinary trends and circumstances. Personal safety is measured by the Company’s total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”), calculated as the number of injuries per 200,000 hours worked. Process safety is measured by the Company’s process safety incident rate (“PSIR”), which represents the number of Tier 1 incidents, as measured by the American Chemistry Council, per 200,000 hours worked. In 2023, the Company achieved TRIR of 0.139 and PSIR was 0.035, resulting in overall payout at 102% of target.

Sustainability (10%)
WHY SUSTAINABILITY? 
To tackle the global challenges of plastic waste and climate change, we set 2030 goals to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions by 42% and scope 3 emissions by 30%. We also set a goal to produce and market at least 2 million metric tons of recycled and renewable-based polymers annually by 2030.(1) We believe that the sustainability metric incentivizes accountability and timely delivery of our climate and circularity goals.

The C&TD Committee considers the Company’s achievement of key milestones supporting our sustainability goals. For additional information2023, the Committee set goals to achieve certain milestones, with target (100%) performance summarized below. Payout at 110% of target reflected the Company’s delivery on these goals.

MilestoneResult

Execution of power purchase agreements

Execute PPAs with cumulative volume from January 1, 2022 of 700 GW of renewable energy capacity

143% of target: Signed PPAs with a combined renewable energy capacity of 1,041 GW

Implementation of energy efficiency projects

Progress energy efficiency projects to improve energy efficiency by 1%

114% of target: Completed projects improving energy efficiency by 1.1%

Recycled and renewable-based polymers

Produce and market 150kt of recycled and renewable-based polymers(1)

73% of target: Produced and marketed 123kt of recycled and renewable-basedproducts(1)
(1)Production and marketing includes (i) joint venture production marketed by LYB plus our pro rata share of the remaining production produced and marketed by the joint venture, and (ii) production via third-party tolling arrangements.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell56
Back to Contents

Individual Performance

The payouts awarded for the individual performance component of the NEOs’ STI award reflect their individual contributions to achieving successful Company performance, whether they met or exceeded expectations for their respective roles, and any other significant factors during the year, such as special projects, challenges, or other performance issues. Individual performance ratings range from 0 to 200%. 

NameIndividual
Target
Bonus
Company
Performance
Component
Individual
Performance
Component

STI
Payout
(as a % of
salary)

 STI
 Payout
Peter Vanacker160%x127%         =     203%$2,946,400
Michael McMurray95%x( (127%    x     75%)+(180%    x   25%) )=133%$1,132,519
Ken Lane95%x( (127%x75%)+(150%x  25%) )=126%$1,097,179
Jim Guilfoyle(1)95%x( (122%x75%)+(120%x  25%) )=116%$916,566
Torkel Rhenman95%x( (127%x75%)+(90%x  25%) )=112%$894,900
(1)The Company performance component of Mr. Guilfoyle’s STI payout (122%) is based 60% on Company performance (127%) and 40% on his award unit performance (115%).

The C&TD Committee has determined that our CEO’s payout under the STI program should be directly tied to, and determined by reference to, Company performance. There was no individual performance component to Mr. Vanacker’s annual STI award. The Committee’s evaluation of each other NEO’s individual performance is described below.

Mr. McMurray’s individual performance rating of 180% is the result of his outstanding leadership of the finance function. In 2023, he successfully helped the Company navigate a challenging market environment, transform the Company’s Advanced Polymer Solutions segment, and create the new CLCS segment, and led the business through a challenging budget process for 2024. He demonstrated excellent cash management and a strong focus on shareholder returns, and was instrumental in helping drive forward the Company’s Value Enhancement Program. Mr. McMurray did an outstanding job leveraging his financial acumen and leadership to help the Company effectively unveil its new strategy and core purpose at the Company’s Capital Markets Day. Further, he has driven an excellent approach to investor relations management, focusing on consistency and clarity. Mr. McMurray effectively translated business strategy into clear, trackable strategic planning, simplifying key financial planning processes and further developing the global operating model and OneFinance transformation initiative for the Finance function. He effectively drove the reorganization of the finance function, bringing in top talent to reinforce a strong business focus and a proactive approach to merger and acquisition management, positively impacting key strategic initiatives. He also successfully oversaw the issuance of the Company’s inaugural green bond, helping advance the Company’s long-term sustainability goals.

Mr. Lane’s individual performance rating of 150% is the result of his leadership of the Olefins & Polyolefins (“O&P”) segment and Procurement function. In 2023, he successfully navigated a volatile and challenging market environment while delivering substantial contributions to the Company’s net income through the implementation of the Company’s Value Enhancement Program within the O&P business segment and procurement. He successfully transformed the O&P business by setting up integrated business teams and bringing manufacturing sites closer to customers. Further, he effectively drove improvements in manufacturing reliability, the focused expansion of the Company’s sustainable procurement program, and the successful implementation of the Company’s greenhouse gas emission reduction program. Mr. Lane also led the development of several new strategic initiatives aimed at growing and upgrading the Company’s core business.

Mr. Guilfoyle’s individual performance rating of 120% reflects his leadership of the Olefins & Polyolefins segment for the Europe, Africa, Middle East, and India region (EAMEI), navigating challenging market conditions while demonstrating strong cash management and execution under weak demand. Mr. Guilfoyle led strong improvements in manufacturing performance with record setting safety performance for the year and exceeding plan targets for the Company’s value enhancement program for several manufacturing sites in EAMEI. Further, he drove several key initiatives in the region for Olefins & Polyolefins, including the launch of the Customer and Commercial Excellence program, the development of business teams in support of growing the Company’s core business, and the execution of several strategic projects.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell57
Back to Contents

Mr. Rhenman’s individual performance rating of 90% reflects his leadership of the Advanced Polymer Solutions (“APS”) segment during the repositioning of the APS segment as a stand-alone and customer-focused business. He successfully developed a new APS business strategy, organization structure, value propositions, and business model. Mr. Rhenman drove the successful restoration of the APS service level to the industry benchmark with strong cash flow performance and the establishment of a project pipeline exceeding $500 million through the Company’s Value Enhancement Program. Despite these efforts, for 2023, business results did not meet the performance plan expectations.
 

2023 Long-Term Incentives 

2023 Grants of Awards

The long-term incentive awards granted to the NEOs in 2023 included PSUs (50%), RSUs (25%), and stock options (25%). The allocation among these types of awards was determined by the C&TD Committee to be the most appropriate split between equity that is performance-based (PSUs) and time-based (RSUs and stock options). RSUs granted for 2021, 2022 and 2023 cliff vest after three years while stock options vest ratably over a three-year period. The C&TD Committee believes this mix balances executive retention with the ability to offer partial, near-term vesting to potential executive hires. 

Performance-based awards that pay out at 0 to 200% of target based on the Company’s TSR over a three-year  period and free cash flow per share relative to long-range plan projections. PSUs reward our executives if our performance over the period compares favorably to peers and expectations.
Time-based awards that cliff vest after three years. RSUs provide retention value and encourage executives to consider the Company’s long-term success, strengthening the alignment between their interests and those of our shareholders.
Time-based awards that are intended to direct executives’ focus toward increasing the market value of our shares. Options vest ratably over three years, expire ten years from the date of grant, and only provide value to the executive if there is an appreciation of our stock price over time.

The value of long-term incentive awards granted to the NEOs is determined as a percentage of base salary. The C&TD Committee reviews the target awards annually and recommends changes based on the Compensationexecutive’s time and experience in the position, changes in job responsibilities, and market data.  At the February 2023 C&TD Committee meeting, it was determined that certain NEOs would receive an increase in LTI target value in order to bring their compensation closer to the median of market.

Name2022 Target 
(% of base salary)
Total Value of
2022 LTI Awards
2023 Target
       (% of base salary)
Total Value of 2023
LTI Awards
Peter Vanacker714%           $    10,000,000759%               $   11,000,000
Michael McMurray350%$2,884,000400%$3,400,000
Ken Lane(1)300%$2,610,000310%$2,697,000
Jim Guilfoyle300%$2,379,000300%$2,379,000
Torkel Rhenman300%$2,379,000310%$2,480,000
(1)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024. Upon his departure, he forfeited any unvested long-term incentive awards.


For a description of the vesting and forfeiture of LTI awards upon termination, please see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page  74.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell58
Back to Contents

2023 Grants of PSUs With a Performance Period Ending December 31, 2025 (50%)

One-half of the value of our NEOs’ annual equity award in 2023 was granted in the form of PSUs. The number of units awarded was determined by dividing that dollar amount by the fair market value of our stock on the grant date, based on the average closing price of the Company’s shares over the 20 trading days prior to the date of grant. PSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance period, which will be converted to additional units using the closing stock price as of the end of the performance period on December 31, 2025. Each unit deemed to be earned on the basis of Company performance will pay out in one share of the Company’s common stock after the performance period concludes.

The number of 2023 PSUs earned will depend 50% on the Company’s TSR over the performance period as compared to selected industry peers and 50% on free cash flow per share as compared to long-range plan projections. We believe use of relative TSR as the metric for performance provides transparency for shareholders and our executives, rewards our executives if we out-perform our peers, and promotes executive accountability to and alignment with our shareholders. Likewise, we believe use of free cash flow per share as a second metric to our PSUs also provides an important measure of performance and rewards our executives for their ability to generate cash from business operations, which is key to our ability to fund growth projects, repay debt, and return capital to shareholders. For further alignment with shareholder interests, the terms of the PSUs provide that no payout will be earned for any year in the performance cycle in which the Company’s quarterly dividend is not paid.

TSR Rank Metric

To determine payout under the relative TSR metric, the C&TD Committee compares TSR for the entire three-year performance period, using a 20-day closing average stock price at the beginning and the end of the period and assuming all dividends are reinvested. As shown below, payout will range from 0 to 200% of target. There is no payout for TSR in the bottom quartile of the peer group.

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Positive TSR Payout  200%  200%  200%  200%  200%  180%  160%  140%  120%  100%  80%  70%  60%  50%          
Negative TSR Payout 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 60% 50% 40%     

The companies that are used as comparators in determining our relative TSR performance (shown below) are eighteen of the Company’s primary competitors, either directly or for investment dollars, in the chemicals industry. For 2023, the C&TD Committee maintained the same TSR peer group as used for the 2022 PSUs, including companies, both within and outside of the S&P 500 Chemicals Index, with respectbusiness models most similar to that of the Company. The C&TD Committee has provided for adjustments to the peer group in the event of bankruptcies, acquisitions, or going-private transactions involving any of the peers during the performance period.

2023 PSUs - TSR Peer Group Companies

Akzo Nobel
Albemarle Corporation
Asahi Kasei Corporation
BASF SE
Celanese Corporation
Covestro AG
Dow Inc.
DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
DSM-Firmenich AG
Eastman Chemical Company
FMC Corporation
Huntsman
Methanex
PPG Industries, Inc.
RPM International
SABIC
Shin Etsu
Westlake Chemical Corp

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell59
Back to Contents
Free Cash Flow per Share Metric

To determine payout under the free cash flow per share metric, the C&TD Committee will compare the Company’s average annual FCF per share during the performance cycle to the expected average annual FCF per share during the period. We define free cash flow per share as (i) cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures for the year divided by (ii) the number of weighted average shares outstanding for the year.

Target FCF per share for the 2023 PSUs, which would result in 100% payout for the metric, was set by the C&TD Committee at the beginning of the performance cycle based on a reasonably-achievable level of performance as determined by the Company’s long-range plan projections. While the Company believes disclosing specific targets during an ongoing performance period would result in competitive harm, the targets will be disclosed along with performance achievement after the performance period has ended and the awards are earned. As shown below, maximum payout of 200% for the metric is awarded if realized FCF per share is equal to or greater than 135% of target, representing a stretch goal that can be achieved only in the event of outstanding performance. There is no payout if realized FCF per share is less than 75% of target. Actual payout will be interpolated between data points.

FCF per Share (% of Target) ≥ 135% 130% 125% 120% 115% 110% 95-105% 90% 85% 80% 75%  < 75%
Payout 200% 183% 167% 150% 133% 117% 100% 88% 75% 63% 50% 

2023 Grants of RSUs (25%)

In 2023, each of our NEOs received a number of RSUs calculated by dividing 25% of the dollar amount of his LTI target by the fair market value of the Company’s shares, based on the average closing price of the Company’s shares over the 20 trading days prior to the date of grant. The 2023 RSU grants vest in full three years after the date of grant.

Upon vesting, holders of RSUs receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each RSU. RSU holders also receive cash dividend equivalents on their units throughout the vesting period.

2023 Grants of Stock Options (25%)

The number of options granted to each NEO is determined by dividing 25% of the value of his annual LTI target by the Black-Scholes value of options for the Company based on the 20 trading days prior to the grant date. The options granted to the NEOs in 2023 vest in three equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date. The exercise price of the options is the fair market value of the Company’s shares on the grant date.

Payout of 2021 PSUs with a Performance Period Ended December 31, 2023

Each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Vanacker, who joined the Company in 2022) received a PSU award with a performance period that ended December 31, 2023. Payout of these PSUs is determined based 50% on the Company’s TSR relative to our peers over the performance period and 50% on the Company’s FCF per share relative to long-range plan projections. At its meeting in February 2024, the C&TD Committee determined that 200% had been earned under the 2021 PSUs, reflecting the fact that the Company’s TSR fell in the top quartile of selected peers and the Company’s FCF per share exceeded the target set by the C&TD Committee.

While the Company believes disclosing specific targets during an ongoing performance period would result in competitive harm, the performance period for the 2021 PSUs ended December 31, 2023. TSR and FCF per share targets for the 2021 PSUs are disclosed below, along with performance results.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell60
Back to Contents
TSR Rank Metric

 Actual Result: 23.48%              
                
                   
Percentile100%94%89%83%78%72%67%61%56%50%44%39%33%28%22%17%11%6%0%
Peer Group TSR(%)68.2332.9623.4820.8918.310.728.347.07-0.41-3.61-6.15-8.13-12.78-19.6-19.65-24.3-27.97-41.98-46.19
Payout(%)20020020020020018016014012010080706050

Free Cash Flow per Share Metric

Actual Result: $13.57

         
            
FCF per Share Target($)≥ 9.539.188.838.478.127.777.066.356.005.655.30< 5.30
Payout (%)20018316715013311710088756350

Additional Information Concerning Executive Compensation

Share Ownership and Holding Requirements

The Company’s Share Ownership Guidelines require executives to achieve an ownership of Company shares that is valued at a percentage of their respective base salaries. Executives are expected to meet or exceed the guidelines within five years of their hiring or promotion into their role. They may not sell shares unless and until these ownership levels have been met and then only shares in excess of the required levels may be sold. Under the guidelines, only shares beneficially owned and RSUs count towards meeting the ownership thresholds. Performance awards, stock options, and dividend equivalents are not counted.

We determine compliance with our Share Ownership Guidelines on a quarterly basis. The number of shares held by each of our continuing NEOs as a multiple of base salary as of December 31, 2023 is set forth below. Mr. Vanacker is still within the five-year transition period for attaining the required ownership. Mr. Lane is no longer subject to the Share Ownership Guidelines following his departure on March 15, 2024.

NameRequired Ownership
as a Multiple of
Base Salary
Shares held
as a Multiple of
Base Salary
Complies or
Within 5-Year
Transition Period
Peter Vanacker6x4.5x
Michael McMurray4x6.1x
Ken Lane3x7.9x
Jim Guilfoyle3x5.7x
Torkel Rhenman3x5.8x

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell61
Back to Contents

Clawbacks

Under the Company’s clawback policy, a copy of which is attached to our 2023 Annual Report in accordance with SEC rules, the C&TD Committee can elect to recover annual bonus or equity compensation consultantsfrom any executive determined to have engaged in misconduct that increased the last fiscal year, seevalue of the “Compensation Discussioncompensation he or she received. Annual bonus compensation may be recovered if an executive engages in misconduct, including any act or failure to act causing a violation of law, Company policies, or GAAP, whether or not such misconduct affected the calculation of his or her bonus compensation. In accordance with SEC rules and Analysis”NYSE listing standards, our clawback policy also allows the Company to recover incentive-based compensation erroneously received by current or former executive officers after an accounting restatement.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

All of our executive officers, including our NEOs, are subject to our Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading. Under this policy, executives may not purchase, sell or write options on page 27LYB shares, engage in short sales, or participate in any other derivative or short-term purchase or sale transactions that would enable them to hedge the economic risk of this proxy statement.their share ownership. Additionally, our executives are prohibited from pledging LYB shares as collateral for personal loans or other obligations, including holding shares in a brokerage margin account. These restrictions extend to executives’ immediate family members and certain related entities and are intended to keep our executives’ interests aligned with the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders.

No hedging

No short sales

No pledging

No margin accounts

Perquisites and Other Benefits

Our NEOs receive the same benefits generally provided to all of our employees, which include vacation allowances, Company matching under our 401(k) plan, Company contributions to our defined benefit pension plan, and health and welfare benefits. The perquisites received by our executives that are not offered to all employees include:

Annual executive physical.
Financial, tax, and estate planning — The Company will reimburse approximately $15,000 of expenses.
Matching under the U.S. Deferral Plan — The Company makes contributions to the U.S. Deferral Plan for amounts that exceed the IRS base salary limits on matching under our 401(k) plan and contributions to our defined benefit pension plan. The value of the contributions is 11% for all base salary compensation in excess of the IRS limits.

From time to time, the Company provides other benefits to our executives that are intended for business purposes, including tax equalization payments, limited personal use of private aircraft or accompanying spouse travel, relocation benefits, and the payment of business club memberships or dues.

Tax equalization payments are designed to make executives whole if they incur income tax in jurisdictions other than their country and/or state of residence. For example, executives may travel to other jurisdictions on Company business and may be taxed based on days worked in those jurisdictions. If, and only to the extent, those additional taxes cannot be offset against the executive’s regular income tax liability (such as in the form of credits), the Company will reimburse an amount sufficient to make the executive’s tax liability equal to the full income tax for his jurisdiction of residence only.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell62
Back to Contents

The Company has agreements with Flexjet, LLC for a fractional ownership interest in and use of private aircraft. The primary use of the Flexjet aircraft is for business purposes, with limited personal use when adjacent to business purposes. From time to time, spouses, family members or personal guests may accompany our executive officers on Flexjet aircraft. The Company may also pay or reimburse the cost of occasional spouse travel related to business trips. When approved travel of a family member or guest is imputed as income to the executive officer, we reimburse the additional income tax incurred, as applicable. During 2023, Mr. Vanacker and Mr. Lane had flights that were considered taxable. The imputed income will be reported and taxed in 2024 with no tax reimbursements for these specific flights.

Taxes

Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executives, including our CEO, CFO, and our three other most highly compensated officers, to $1 million annually. Historically, the deduction limit did not apply to certain performance-based compensation, and we took Section 162(m) and the deductibility of compensation, among other factors, into consideration in structuring our annual bonuses and certain long-term incentive awards.

The C&TD Committee will continue to consider tax implications (including the lack of deductibility under section 162(m)) among other relevant factors in designing and implementing our executive compensation programs. We will continue to monitor taxation, applicable incentives, standard practice in our industry, and other factors and adjust our executive compensation programs as needed.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell63
Back to Contents

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation and Talent Development Committee of the Supervisory Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management, and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Supervisory Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee of the Supervisory Board

Jacques Aigrain,Chairman

Lincoln Benet

Milton Carroll

Bella Goren

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the CompensationTalent Development Committee was, during fiscal year 2015, an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, or was formerly an officer of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, or had any relationships requiring disclosure by us under Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K.

During fiscal year 2015, none of our executive officers served as:

 

a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity that had an executive officer who served on our Compensation Committee;

a director of another entity that had an executive officer who served on our Compensation Committee; or

a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of another entity that had an executive officer who served as a Supervisory Director of the Company.

Albert Manifold, Nominating & Governance CommitteeChair

The current members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are Ms. Farley (Chair) and Messrs. Bindra, Buchanan, Carroll and van der Meer. Each member is independent in accordance with the rules and regulations of the NYSE.

The Nominating & Governance Committee met eight times during 2015. One of the primary responsibilities of the Nominating & Governance Committee is to identify nominees for election to the Supervisory Board. As described in this proxy statement, the Supervisory Board has nominated Messrs. Aigrain, Benet and Smith and Ms. Dicciani for election at the Annual Meeting.

The Nominating & Governance Committee’s written charter, which was approved by the Supervisory Board, can be viewed by on our website at www.lyb.com. It is the duty of the Nominating & Governance Committee to oversee matters regarding corporate governance. In fulfilling its duties, the Nominating & Governance Committee has the following responsibilities:
Anthony Chase
Rita Griffin
Virginia Kamsky

 

  

Administrative - Perform an annual self-assessment2024Proxy Statement   

   LyondellBasell64
Back to Contents

Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the compensation of our NEOs for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.

Name and
Principal Position
 Year Salary(2)
($)
 Bonus(3)
($)
 Stock
Awards(4)
($)
 Option
Awards(5)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(6)
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value(7)
($)
 All Other
Compensation(8)
($)
 Total
($)

Peter Vanacker(1) 

Chief Executive Officer

 2023 1,437,500  8,978,151 2,664,298 2,946,400 16,479 503,366 16,546,194
 2022 861,538 1,900,000 9,676,036 2,500,004 1,398,485 13,547 669,379 17,018,989

Michael McMurray

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 2023 843,500  2,775,140 823,520 1,132,519 19,924 102,024 5,696,627
 2022 824,000  2,050,443 721,022 2,409,387 12,936 91,685 6,109,473
 2021 818,185  2,186,241 738,700 1,312,040 13,936 86,092 5,155,194

Ken Lane(2)

Executive Vice President Global Olefins & Polyolefins and Procurement

 2023 870,000  2,201,335 653,260 1,097,179 20,675 603,110 5,445,559
 2022 968,825  3,582,510 717,419 3,389,488 11,365 128,469 8,798,076
 2021 787,503  1,841,166 622,124 1,262,839 13,734 88,429 4,615,795

Jim Guilfoyle

Senior Vice President Olefins & Polyolefins EAMEI

 2023 793,562  1,942,151 576,288 916,566 46,611 824,643 5,099,821
 2022 770,183  1,691,684 594,846 2,817,421  89,244 5,963,378
 2021 671,408  1,625,037 549,087 1,075,996 17,959 76,292 4,015,779

Torkel Rhenman

Executive Vice President Advanced Polymer Solutions

 2023 798,275  2,024,259 600,685 894,900 20,740 91,436 4,430,295
 2022 793,100  1,691,684 594,846 2,923,912 13,734 94,791 6,112,067
 2021 787,503  1,841,166 622,124 1,262,839 14,399 88,125 4,616,156

(1)Mr. Vanacker assumed his position as CEO effective May 23, 2022.
(2)From January 1, 2022 to May 22, 2022, Mr. Lane served as Interim CEO and coordinate evaluations by other committeeshis base salary was $1,200,000. From May 23, 2022 to September 30, 2022, his  base salary was $793,100. From October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022, his base salary was $870,000. Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024. As a result of his departure, unvested RSUs, PSUs and options as of such date granted to Mr. Lane were forfeited, resulting in the forfeiture of 27,949 RSUs, 28,233 PSUs, and option awards representing 26,999 shares of common stock. The forfeiture of these awards is not reflected in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns above, which are based on the aggregate grant date fair value of the full Supervisory Board;

awards, as further detailed in footnotes (4) and (5) below.
(3)Represents a cash sign-on bonus paid in connection with the 2022 appointment of Mr. Vanacker.

 

 

Supervisory Directors and Supervisory Director Nominees - Identify and recommend candidates for membership on the Supervisory Board; recommend committee memberships and recommend Supervisory Board compensation; and

Corporate Governance - Review the Company’s governance profile and make recommendations; and review and comment on shareholder proposals.

Potential Supervisory Director candidates are identified through various methods. The Nominating & Governance Committee welcomes suggestions from Supervisory Directors, members of Company management, and shareholders. From time to time, the Nominating & Governance Committee uses outside consultants to assist in identifying potential Supervisory Director candidates. The Supervisory Board and Nominating & Governance Committee do not have a policy specific to the candidates nominated by different parties and considers all nominees for vacancies on their merits without regard to the source of recommendation. The Supervisory Board has adopted a profile, which can be found on our website, which details the desired characteristics and experience of members of the Supervisory Board. The Nominating & Governance Committee considers this profile (in addition to any other factors it deems relevant) when considering candidates for nomination to the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board intends to maintain a manageable size as stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Nominating & Governance Committee believes that the nominating process will and should continue to involve significant subjective judgments. To suggest a nominee for the Committee to consider for nomination as a Class I Supervisory Director at the general meeting in 2017, submit your candidate’s name, together with biographical information and his written consent to nomination to the Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee at the Company’s offices in Houston, Texas, at 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 300, Houston Texas 77010, before November 28, 2016.

HSE Committee

The current members of the HSE Committee are Messrs. van der Meer (Chairman), Bindra and Cooper and Ms. Dicciani. The HSE Committee met four times during 2015. The HSE Committee’s written charter, which

was approved by the Supervisory Board, can be viewed on our website at www.lyb.com. It is the duty of the HSE Committee to assist the Supervisory Board in its oversight responsibilities by assessing the effectiveness of environmental, health and safety programs and initiatives that support the Company’s policies and reviewing the Company’s material technologies and the risks relating to its technology portfolio. In fulfilling its duties, the HSE Committee has the following responsibilities:

Administrative - Perform an annual self-evaluation; review the status of the Company’s health, safety and environmental policies and performance, including processes to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

Performance - Review and monitor the Company’s health, safety and environmental performance statistics, provide oversight of the programs, initiatives and activities in the areas of technology and sustainability and review with management the existing and emerging technologies, and environment, health, safety, product stewardship and other sustainability issues that can have a material impact on the Company; and review the status of our environment, health, safety, product stewardship and other sustainability policies, programs and practices;

Audit - Review and approve the scope of the health, safety and environmental audit program and regularly monitor program results; review and approve the annual budget for the health, safety and environmental audit program; and

Reporting - Report periodically to the Supervisory Board on technology, health, safety and environmental matters affecting the Company.

Dutch Corporate Governance Code

In addition to the NYSE listing standards and rules and regulations as promulgated by the SEC, as a Dutch company, our governance practices are governed by the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”) a copy of which is available at www.commissiecorporategovernance.nl. The Code contains a number of principles and best practices, with emphasis on integrity, transparency and accountability as the primary means of achieving good governance.

We conduct our operations in accordance with internationally accepted principles of good governance and best practice, while ensuring compliance with the corporate governance requirements applicable in the countries in which we operate. There is considerable overlap between the requirements we must meet under U.S. rules and regulations and the provisions of the Code, and we apply almost all of the provisions of the Code.

The Code’s compliance principle is “apply-or-explain,” which permits Dutch companies to be fully compliant with the Dutch Code either by applying the Dutch practices or explaining why the company has chosen to apply different practices. We are disclosing in our Dutch annual report that accompanies our Annual Accounts the extent to which we do not apply provisions of the Code, together with the reasons for those deviations. The Dutch annual report may be found on our website at www.lyb.com. Below is a general description of the provisions of the Code that we have determined not to apply:

Principles and Practices Related to the Management Board:

The Code states that options granted to Managing Directors should not be exercisable in the first three years after the date of grant. The stock options we grant to our executive officers, including our Managing Directors, are exercisable before the third anniversary of the date of grant. The vesting terms of options to our Managing Directors vary between three and five years, and begin vesting on the first anniversary of date of grant. We believe our vesting schedules are in line with the practices of our peer group used for executive compensation purposes and NYSE listed companies generally. Additionally, we believe that the vesting schedules we use are appropriate and necessary to attract and retain the best people and incentivize our executives to achieve the best results for our stakeholders both over the shorter and longer term.

Under the Code it is best practice to determine the number of shares and options granted dependent on the achievement of specified targets. The number of options and shares that we grant to our executives, including Managing Directors, is determined based on an overall target of equity based compensation, calculated as a percentage of base salary, rather than on the achievement of specified targets. The targeted values of options and shares granted are determined based on peer group analyses to ensure competitive compensation for attracting and retaining our executives.

Best practice under the Code is to retain for at least five years (or until the end of employment, if employment is terminated earlier) any shares granted as compensation without consideration. We do not require all shares granted as compensation to be held for five years or until the end of employment. Instead, our Compensation Committee implemented share ownership requirements that restrict selling of shares unless certain levels of equity are held. We believe that the share ownership guidelines appropriately ensure executives retain enough equity to make certain their interests are aligned with shareholders while also allowing flexibility for diversification of personal wealth.

Finally, under the Code, compensation in the event of termination of employment should not exceed one year’s salary (unless manifestly unreasonable, in which case it may not exceed two year’s salary). Our Managing Directors are party to employment agreements or participate in our Executive Severance Plan. Under the agreements and the Plan, Managing Directors may receive severance payments that include one year’s base salary plus the annual bonus at target, depending on the reason for the termination of employment. We believe that these severance arrangements are consistent with market practices and our peer group severance arrangements and are necessary at times to attract or retain qualified leaders.

Principles and Practices Related to the Supervisory Board:

The Code contains a best practice provision stating that all but one member of the Supervisory Board should be independent. Our Supervisory Board currently consists of twelve members, three of whom (Messrs. Benet, Buchanan and Cooper) have been nominated by a shareholder pursuant to a nomination agreement. Under the provisions of the Code, but not under the NYSE listing standards, those three members are not considered independent as a result of their affiliation with the shareholder that nominated them, which owns more than 10% of our shares. This deviation from the Code is a result of our obligation under the nomination agreement with an affiliate of Access Industries to nominate individuals to our Supervisory Board. We believe these individuals provide significant value to the workings of the Supervisory Board.

The Code includes a best practice provision stating that Supervisory Directors should be limited to no more than three four-year terms. We have no term limits for Supervisory Board members. Our Supervisory Board consists of three classes, each with a three-year term. There is no limit on the number of terms those individuals may serve. We believe that, as we have been operating only since April 2010, there is no need to subject our Supervisory Board members to term limits at this time, particularly given the longest tenure of any of our current Supervisory Directors is less than six years. The continuity of our current members’ service helps build and improve the Company.

Finally, the Code states that Supervisory Directors should not be granted Company equity as compensation. As described under “Compensation of the Members of the Supervisory Board,” our Supervisory Board members receive equity compensation in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The RSUs pay out in one share for each unit after restrictions lapse. Additionally, in 2015 the Supervisory Board determined to revise the compensation program for its members beginning in 2016 to allow them to elect to receive shares of the Company in lieu of their cash retainers. The Company will issue shares to those directors who have elected this option at the same time as quarterly cash payments would otherwise be made. The number of shares issued is determined by dividing the cash payment by the average of the closing price of our shares over the quarter in which the compensation was earned. We believe that providing Supervisory Directors with equity compensation is extremely important in recruiting individuals for service in order to be competitive with our peers. We also believe that equity grants ensure that Supervisory Directors’ interests are aligned with those of our shareholders.

Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a written Related Party Transaction Approval Policy, which requires the disinterested members of the Audit Committee to review and approve, in advance of commitment, certain transactions that we may enter into with related parties, including Supervisory Directors, Managing Directors, executive officers and certain shareholders. The transactions covered by the policy are those which are:

in the ordinary course of business but have an aggregate value of $25 million or more,

not in the ordinary course of business, regardless of value, or

any transaction where an executive officer or Supervisory Director of the Company has a direct or indirect material interest and the transaction has a value of $120,000 or more.

The disinterested members of the Audit Committee determine the fairness of the transactions to the Company by considering whether the transactions have terms no less favorable than those which could be obtained from non-related parties. Below is a description of related party transactions in existence since the beginning of the last fiscal year.

In 2010, we entered into certain agreements with affiliates of Access Industries. These agreements include a registration rights agreement that obligates us to register and bear the costs for the resale of equity securities owned by Access Industries or its affiliates, and a nomination agreement. Pursuant to the nomination agreement, Access Industries has the right to nominate individuals for appointment to the Supervisory Board if certain ownership thresholds are met. Access Industries currently owns more than 18% of our outstanding shares and nominated Messrs. Benet, Buchanan and Cooper pursuant to the agreement. The nomination rights continue for so long as Access Industries owns at least 5% of our outstanding shares. The Company entered into these agreements before it became publicly traded and the Related Party Transaction Policy was adopted.

On an ongoing basis and in the ordinary course of business, the Company makes spot purchases of natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), which are raw materials used by the Company to manufacture its products, from Anadarko Petroleum. Robert G. Gwin, the Chairman of our Supervisory Board, serves as Executive Vice President and CFO of Anadarko Petroleum. In July 2014, the disinterested members of the Audit Committee approved the Company making spot purchases from Anadarko as it deems appropriate. The determination was based on the fact the transactions were on terms no less favorable than those which could be obtained from non-related parties. The Company purchased $62 million of NGLs from a subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum in 2015. The Audit Committee considered these purchases in connection with the determination that Mr. Gwin is independent. The Company does not believe that Mr. Gwin’s position at Anadarko gives rise to a direct or indirect material interest in the transactions.

In late 2014 and early 2015, the Supervisory Board agreed to advance legal expenses to certain related parties, including Bob Patel, our CEO and Chairman of the Management Board; Jim Gallogly, former CEO and Chairman of the Management Board; Craig Glidden, former Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer; and Kevin Brown, our Executive Vice President – Manufacturing and Refining. The expenses relate to certain equity compensation granted to these individuals in connection with their joining the Company that are the subject of audits by the Internal Revenue Service. The Supervisory Board’s decision to advance the expenses was in light of contractual arrangements between the Company and those individuals and based on the Supervisory Board’s determination that the Company has a common interest in the resolution of the audits, given they relate to the Company’s equity compensation practices. At this time, we believe the interest of each of the individuals named may exceed $120,000.

Compensation of the Members of the Supervisory Board

The members of our Supervisory Board receive both equity and cash compensation for their service on the Supervisory Board and its committees. The Supervisory Directors’ compensation is designed to provide a competitive package that will enable the Company to attract and retain highly skilled individuals with relevant experience.

The Supervisory Board compensation program is set forth below. Beginning in 2016, Supervisory Directors are permitted to elect to receive the cash component of their retainer payments in Company shares. The actual amounts earned by or paid to Supervisory Directors in 2015 are in the following table entitled “Supervisory Director Compensation.” The Supervisory Board is subject to ownership guidelines that are similar to those for our executive officers. The ownership guidelines prohibit members of the Supervisory Board from selling more than 50% of the net shares they receive upon vesting of their equity compensation each year unless they hold shares that are valued at three times their annual cash retainer.

Annual Retainer

Cash

RSUs

$115,000 ($215,000 for Chairman of the Board)

Valued at $170,000 ($310,000 for Chairman of the Supervisory Board)

Committee Retainer

Members

$10,000 ($15,000 for Audit Committee)

Chairs

$20,000 ($27,500 for Audit and Compensation Committee Chairs)

In addition to the retainers shown above, recognizing the time and effort international travel requires, we pay members of the Supervisory Board $5,000 for each intercontinental trip taken in performing their board service.

SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Name

  Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)(1)
   Stock
Awards
($)(2)
   All Other
Compensation
($)(3)(4)
   Total ($) 

Robert G. Gwin, Chairman

   240,000     310,000     27,483     577,483  

Jacques Aigrain

   157,500     170,000     10,433     339,933  

Lincoln Benet

   68,028     155,188     5,000     228,216  

Jagjeet S. Bindra

   145,000     170,000     32,504     347,304  

Robin Buchanan

   118,123     170,000          288,123  

Milton Carroll

   135,000     170,000     12,342     317,342  

Stephen F. Cooper

   118,123     170,000     27,048     315,171  

Nance K. Dicciani

   140,000     170,000     27,159     337,159  

Claire Farley

   131,877     170,000     22,673     324,550  

Bella Goren

   140,000     170,000     27,746     337,746  

Bruce A. Smith

   149,377     170,000     17,761     337,138  

Rudy M.J. van der Meer

   145,000     170,000     7,283     322,283  

(1)Includes retainers for services earned or paid through December 31, 2015.
(2)Represents 1,647 restricted stock units, or RSUs, for all Supervisory Directors, other than Mr. Gwin and Mr. Benet. Mr. Gwin received 3,003 RSUs as his compensation as Chairman of the Supervisory Board. Mr. Benet received a pro-rated grant of 1,560 RSUs when he joined the Supervisory Board in June 2015. These awards are the only stock awards outstanding at 2015 fiscal year-end for the Supervisory Directors. In accordance with FASB Topic ASC 718,Compensation – Stock Compensation, the grant date fair value of the awards generally is the number of shares issued times the market value of our shares on that date. See Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statement included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a description accounting for equity-based compensation.
(3)Includes $5,000 for each intercontinental trip taken for work performed for the Company. The fees paid for each Supervisory Director are as follows: $5,000 for each of Messrs. Benet and van der Meer; $10,000 for each of Messrs. Carroll and Aigrain; $15,000 for Mr. Smith; $20,000 for Ms. Farley; $25,000 for each of Messrs. Cooper, Gwin, Ms. Dicciani and Ms. Goren; and $30,000 for Mr. Bindra. Also includes benefits in kind related to tax preparation and advice related to the Supervisory Directors’ UK and Dutch tax returns and payments. The Company provides these services, through a third party, to the Supervisory Director because of our unique incorporation and tax domicile situation.
(4)The terms of the RSUs granted to directors entitle them to dividend equivalent payments when and if dividends are paid on the Company’s shares generally.

ELECTION OF SUPERVISORY BOARD DIRECTORS

The Supervisory Board currently consists of twelve individuals, and is divided into three classes. Supervisory Directors are elected for three-year terms on a staggered term basis. The term of office for current Class III Supervisory Directors expires at the Annual Meeting, and the Supervisory Board is proposing the election of Messrs. Aigrain, Benet and Smith and Ms. Dicciani for three-year terms.

Each of the Supervisory Directors and Supervisory Director nominees listed below has served as a director of one or more public and/or international companies and on a variety of board committees. As such, they have executive management and director oversight experience in most, if not all, of the following areas: strategy development and implementation; risk assessment and management; financial accounting and reporting; internal controls; corporate finance; capital project evaluation; the evaluation, compensation, motivation and retention of senior executive talent; public policies as they affect global industrial corporations; compliance; corporate governance; productivity management; safety management; project management; and, in most cases, global operations. Many of the Supervisory Directors and Supervisory Director nominees also bring substantial experience and particular insights into the petrochemical and energy industry. These individuals collectively provide a range of perspectives, experiences and competencies well-suited to providing advice to management and to overseeing the Company’s business and operations.

The information found below about our Supervisory Board is as of March 3, 2016. Information relating to the share ownership of our Supervisory Directors and nominees may be found under the “Supervisory Director, Supervisory Director Nominee and Management Share Ownership” section on page 24.

ELECTION OF SUPERVISORY BOARD DIRECTORS

(Item 1 on the Proxy Card)

The first proposal on the agenda is to elect Messrs. Aigrain, Benet and Smith and Ms. Dicciani as Class III Supervisory Directors until the annual meeting in 2019. Mr. Benet was nominated by Access Industries pursuant to a nomination agreement, entered into in 2010 and amended in 2015, between the Company and affiliates of Access.

Class III Supervisory Directors

Jacques Aigrain, French-Swiss, 61,

Class III Supervisory Director since May 2011

Partner, Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm, since June 2013.

Director of The London Stock Exchange Group Plc, a diversified international stock exchange, since May 2013.

Director of WPP plc, a multinational advertising and public relations company, since May 2013.

Director of Lufthansa German Airlines, from September 2007 to April 2015.

Chairman of LCH Clearnet Group, Limited, a clearinghouse group, from March 2010 to March 2015.

Director of Resolution Ltd., a financial services company that acquires businesses in the insurance industry, from February 2010 to March 2013.

Director of Qatar Financial Centre Authority, the commercial arm of the Qatar Financial Centre, from April 2012 to October 2015.

Mr. Aigrain has extensive operational, financial and management expertise, as well as considerable experience with international companies and board service, among other skills.

Lincoln Benet, American-British, 52,

Class III Supervisory Director since June 2015

Chief Executive Officer of Access Industries, a privately held industrial group, since 2006.

Director of Warner Music Group, a recorded music and music publishing business, since July 2011.

Director of Clal Industries Ltd., a privately held investment company, since July 2012.

Mr. Benet has corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, fixed income and capital markets expertise as well as experience in executive management, leadership and strategy.

Nance K. Dicciani, American, 68,

Class III Supervisory Director since September 2013

Director of Halliburton, an oilfield services company, since September 2009.

Director of Praxair, an industrial gases company, since September 2008.

Director of AgroFresh Solutions, Inc., a horticultural technology company, since July 2015.

Director of Rockwood Holdings, a specialty chemicals and advanced materials company from May 2008 until June 2014.

Ms. Dicciani’s career history includes executive roles at specialty chemical companies that give her unique insight into the petrochemical industry. Ms. Dicciani has expertise in financial, senior management, general management, strategic planning, risk and asset management, corporate governance and public company matters.

Bruce A. Smith, American, 72,

Class III Supervisory Director since July 2010

Chief Executive Officer of One Cypress Energy LLC, a crude petroleum products logistics provider, since December 2011.

Director of Ventech Engineers, Inc., an engineering and procurement services company, since January 2012.

Director of GEVO, Inc., a renewable chemicals and advanced biofuels company from June 2010 to February 2015.

Mr. Smith has extensive senior leadership experience in the refining industry, substantial management background in publicly traded companies and previous experience serving as a director and chairman of the audit and compensation committees of publicly traded companies.

Election of individuals as members of the Supervisory Board is governed by our Articles of Association, which require shareholders to elect Supervisory Board nominees. Unless two-thirds of votes representing at least fifty percent of the Company’s issued share capital vote against the nominees, the nomination is considered binding under the Company’s Articles of Association and the individuals will be elected to the Supervisory Board.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend shareholders vote FOR the election of each of the named candidates.

Supervisory Directors Not Standing for Election

Information, as of March 3, 2016, with respect to the Supervisory Directors who are not standing for election is as follows:

Jagjeet S. Bindra, American, 68,

Class I Supervisory Director since May 2011

Director of Edison International, a generator and distributor of electric power, and its subsidiary, Southern California Edison Co., an electric utility company, since April 2010.

Director of WorleyParsons, a global provider of project delivery and consulting services to the resources and energy sectors and complex process industries, since July 2015.

Director of Transocean Ltd., an offshore drilling contractor and the provider of drilling management services, from 2011 to 2014.

Director of Larsen & Toubro, a technology, engineering, construction and manufacturing company, from 2009 to 2012.

Director and Deputy Chairman of Transfield Services, a global provider of operations, maintenance and asset and project management services, from 2009 to 2012.

Mr. Bindra’s career history includes executive roles at Chevron which, in addition to his other public company board service, gives him expertise in finance, general management, senior management, mergers and acquisitions, strategic planning, government and regulatory affairs, risk and asset management, capital markets, corporate governance and general public company oversight.

Robin Buchanan, British, 63,

Class II Supervisory Director since May 2011

Senior Advisor to Bain & Company, a global business consulting firm, since 2007.

Director of Schroders plc, a global asset management company, since March 2010.

Chairman of Michael Page International plc, a specialist recruitment company, from December 2011 to December 2015.

Mr. Buchanan has extensive knowledge and experience relating to strategy, leadership, business management and corporate governance and extensive experience in serving on corporate boards and consulting for companies in an array of industries, including the industrial sector.

Milton Carroll, American, 65,

Class I Supervisory Director since July 2010

Chairman of CenterPoint Energy, a public utility holding company, since October 2002.

Chairman of Instrument Products, a private oil-tool manufacturing company, since October 1977.

Director of Halliburton, an oilfield services company, since December 2006.

Director of Health Care Service Corporation, a health benefits company, since November 1998.

Director of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP, an owner, operator and developer of midstream energy assets, since April 2008.

Director of LRR Energy, L.P., from 2011 to January 2014.

As an experienced director of several public companies, Mr. Carroll brings with him expertise in finance, general management, senior management, mergers and acquisitions, strategic planning, government and regulatory affairs, risk and asset management, corporate governance and general public company oversight.

Stephen F. Cooper, American, 69,

Class II Supervisory Director since July 2010

Chief Executive Officer and Director of Warner Music Group Corp., a recorded music and music publishing business, since August 2011.

Managing Partner of Cooper Investment Partners, a private equity firm specializing in underperforming companies, since July 2008.

Director of Ventech Engineers, Inc., an engineering and procurement services firm, since September 2011.

Mr. Cooper has considerable experience as a financial and executive advisor to companies facing operational and performance issues. He has substantial and expansive experience in various industries that provides him with significant expertise in all aspects of supervising management of large, complex companies.

Claire S. Farley, American, 57,

Class I Supervisory Director since February 2014

Director of FMC Technologies, Inc., a global provider of technology solutions for the energy industry, since May, 2009.

Vice Chair of KKR Energy Group, since January 2016.

Member of KKR Management LLC, the general partner of KKR & Co. L.P., a global investment firm, from January 2013 to December 2015.

Managing Director of KKR Energy Group from November 2011 to December 2012.

Co - Chief Executive Officer of RPM Energy, a privately-owned oil and gas exploration and development company, from September 2010 to November 2011.

Director of Encana Corporation, a North American energy provider, from April, 2008 through August 2014.

Ms. Farley is a former oil and gas executive with public company experience, which provides her with expertise in mergers and acquisitions, strategic planning, finance, general management, senior management, risk and asset management, capital markets, corporate governance and general public company oversight.

Isabella D. Goren, American, 55,

Class II Supervisory Director since February 2014

Director of MassMutual Financial Group, a mutual life insurance company, whose major affiliates include Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. and Babson Capital Management LLC, among others, since December 2014.

Director of Gap Inc., a global retail company with a portfolio of brands, since August 2011.

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AMR Corporation, a commercial aviation company and the parent holding company of several airlines, including American Airlines, Inc., a global airline, where she also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, from July 2010 to December 2013.1

Ms. Goren has extensive experience in executive management of capital intensive and highly competitive businesses, complex international operations and global operating strategies. She brings with her skills and

1

AMR Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. successfully completed a reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in December 2013, for which a voluntary petition was filed in November 2011.

expertise in financial matters, senior executive leadership, general management, strategic planning, and public company governance experience.

Robert G. Gwin, American, 52,

Class II Supervisory Director since May 2011

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, an oil and gas exploration and production company, since March 2009.

Chairman of Western Gas Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP, an owner, operator and developer of midstream energy assets, since October 2009 and director since August 2007.

Chairman of Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Western Gas Equity Partners, LP since November 2012.

Mr. Gwin has expansive experience relating to the oil and gas industry, finance, public company board experience and executive management expertise, among other skills.

Rudy van der Meer, Dutch, 71,

Class I Supervisory Director since July 2010

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Coöperatie VGZ U.A., a health insurer, since 2011.

Supervisory Director of James Hardie Industries S.E., an industrial fibre cement products and systems manufacturer, since 2007.

Chairman of Supervisory Board of Royal Imtech N.V., a technical services provider, from 2005 to 2013.

Chairman of Supervisory Board of Energie Beheer Nederland B.V., a Dutch state owned natural gas exploration, production, transportation and sale company, from 2006 to 2013.

Chairman of Supervisory Board of Gazelle Holding B.V., a bicycle manufacturing company, from 2005 to 2011.

Supervisory Director of ING Nederland N.V, retail banking and insurance subsidiaries, respectively, of ING Groep N.V., from 2004 to 2011.

Mr. van der Meer’s career history includes three decades at AkzoNobel, a leading global paints and coatings company and a major producer of specialty chemicals. Mr. van der Meer brings with him expertise related to general management, senior management, mergers and acquisitions, government and regulatory affairs, risk and asset management and corporate governance and public company experience, particularly as they relate to Dutch multinational companies.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MANAGEMENT BOARD

The Management Board as a body is vested with the authority to manage the Company, which includes, among other things:

the setting and achievement of the Company’s objectives;

the Company’s strategy, its policies, and the ensuing delivery of results, the risks inherent in its business activities and the financing of the Company;

the structure and operation of the internal risk management and control systems;

the financial reporting process and the establishment and maintenance of the internal controls over financial reporting;

the disclosure of information on matters that may substantially influence the price of the Company’s listed securities;

compliance with all legislation and regulations applicable to the Company;

the relation between the Company and its stakeholders, including shareholders;

the corporate social responsibilities of the Company; and

the Company’s corporate structure.

The Management Board is accountable for the performance of its duties to the Supervisory Board and the shareholders. Notwithstanding serving on the Management Board, executives retain individual responsibilities specific to their positions, including under applicable law and regulations, such as required CEO and CFO certificates and affirmations. However, the individuals elected as Managing Directors generally share authority for the overall management of the Company.

Our Articles of Association provide that the Supervisory Board shall determine the number of members of the Management Board. Until 2014, the Management Board consisted solely of our CEO. In 2014, the Supervisory Board determined that the number of members of the Management Board should increase to include additional members of senior management. The role of the additional members of the Management Board is to assist the CEO and Chairman of the Management Board with the deployment of the Company’s strategy and policies, and the achievement of its objectives and results, while maintaining day-to-day responsibility for their respective areas of management of the Company.

The Supervisory Board believes that Thomas Aebischer, the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Dan Coombs, the Company’s Executive Vice President – Global Olefins & Polyolefins and Technology, and Jim Guilfoyle, the Company’s Senior Vice President – Global Intermediates & Derivatives should be elected to the Management Board. The addition of Mr. Aebischer, Mr. Coombs and Mr. Guilfoyle will contribute to the well roundedness of the Management Board and enhance the current governance of the Company.

ELECTION OF MANAGING DIRECTORS

(Item 2 on the Proxy Card)

As set forth in our Articles of Association, Managing Directors are elected for a term of no more than four years. The Supervisory Board is asking shareholders to elect Mr. Aebischer, Mr. Coombs and Mr. Guilfoyle each for a two-year term ending on the date of our annual general meeting of shareholders in 2018 to coincide with the end of the terms of the current members of the Management Board.

Thomas Aebischer, Swiss, 54

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2016

As the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Aebischer is responsible for the Company’s treasury, information technology, tax, finance and accounting functions.

Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Aebischer served as the Chief Financial Officer of LaFargeHolcim from July 2015 to December 2015, and as the Chief Financial Officer of Holcim Ltd. from January 2011 to June 2015.

Dan Coombs, American, 59,

Executive Vice President – Global Olefins & Polyolefins and Technology since January 2016

Mr. Coombs is currently responsible for the Company’s Olefins & Polyolefins Americas, Europe, Asia and International and Technology businesses, as well as for the Company’s procurement function. Mr. Coombs

previously served as Executive Vice President – Intermediates & Derivatives and Technology since May 2015, when he joined the Company. In that role, he also had responsibility for the Company’s supply chain and procurement functions. Before joining the Company, Mr. Coombs spent several years with Chevron Philips Chemical Company where he served in executive leadership roles overseeing an array of functions and businesses, including Manufacturing; Specialties, Aromatics and Styrenics; Corporate Planning and Development; and Chevron Phillips’ Qatar operations.

James D. Guilfoyle, American, 45

Senior Vice President – Global Intermediates & Derivatives since January 2016

Mr. Guilfoyle leads the Company’s Intermediates & Derivatives business and is also responsible for the Company’s supply chain function. Mr. Guilfoyle has served as Senior Vice President, Global Intermediates and Derivatives since June 2015, adding the supply chain function in January 2016. Prior to that, he served in a variety of leadership roles at the Company, including Vice President of Global Propylene Oxide and Co-Products from March 2015 to May 2015, Director of Polymer Sales Americas from January 2012 to February 2015 and Director of High Density Polyethylene from November 2006 to December 2011.

Information about Mr. Aebischer, Mr. Coombs and Mr. Guilfoyle’s share ownership can be found in the “Supervisory Director, Supervisory Director Nominee and Management Share Ownership” section on page 24.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting for each individual is required to elect each of the nominees to the Management Board.

Our Supervisory Board recommends shareholders vote FOR the election of each of Mr. Aebischer, Mr. Coombs and Mr. Guilfoyle.

Information with respect to nationality, age, term of office and background of each of the current members of the Management Board, as of March 3, 2016, is shown below.

Bhavesh (Bob) V. Patel, American, 49

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Management Board since January 2015

Prior to being named Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Patel led our Olefins & Polyolefins businesses and oversaw the Company’s manufacturing operations in Europe, Asia and other non-North American jurisdictions. He also was responsible for the Company’s Technology business, which encompasses licensing and support of our technology. Mr. Patel was the Senior Vice President of O&P – EAI and Technology from November 2010 until October 2013 when he was promoted to Executive Vice President and given responsibility for the Company’s manufacturing operations in addition to his other responsibilities.

From March 2010 until June 2011, Mr. Patel was SVP, O&P – Americas, responsible for managing all of our North American and South American olefins and polyolefins businesses. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Patel was General Manager of Olefins & NGL for Chevron Phillips Chemical Company from June 2009 to March 2010 and General Manager of its Asia Pacific businesses from April 2008 to June 2009.

Kevin W. Brown, American, 58

Executive Vice President, Manufacturing & Refining since January 2015

As Executive Vice President – Manufacturing & Refining, Mr. Brown is responsible for the Company’s Global Manufacturing as well as the business and operations of our Houston refinery. Prior to being named Executive Vice President, Mr. Brown served as Senior Vice President – Refining since October 2009, overseeing the Company’s refining operations. Mr. Brown also has responsibility for the Company’s Global Projects functions. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Brown spent several years as an Executive Vice President and a Director of Sinclair Oil, a privately-held American petroleum company.

Jeffrey A. Kaplan, American, 47

Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since February 2015

As Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, Mr. Kaplan has responsibility for the Company’s legal affairs globally as well as the Company’s government affairs, public relations and corporate communications. Prior to his current role, Mr. Kaplan served as Deputy General Counsel since December 2009, overseeing several areas of the Company’s legal department, including disputes, operations, HSE, commercial and labor and employment. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Kaplan served in a variety of leadership roles at Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, including deputy general counsel. Prior to 2001, Mr. Kaplan was in private law practice in Houston, Texas.

SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR, SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR NOMINEE AND MANAGEMENT SHARE OWNERSHIP

Under SEC rules, we are required to include, in tabular format, information relating to the beneficial ownership of our shares by each (i) Supervisory Director, (ii) Supervisory Director nominee, and (iii) executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 49. We also are required to include information with respect to all of these individuals, and all other executive officers, as a group. For purposes of this table, shares are considered to be “beneficially” owned if the person, directly or indirectly, has sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to such shares. In addition, a person is deemed to beneficially own shares if that person has the right to acquire such shares within 60 days of March 3, 2016.

Our Supervisory Directors, Supervisory Director nominees and executive officers, individually and in the aggregate, beneficially own less than 1% of our outstanding shares as of March 3, 2016.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

Name

Shares
Owned(2)
 

Jacques Aigrain

2024Proxy Statement   
   LyondellBasell6,49765

Lincoln Benet

1,560

Jagjeet S. Bindra (1)

19,995

Robin Buchanan

28,410

Milton Carroll

1,901

Stephen F. Cooper

17,410

Nance K. Dicciani

7,027

Claire S. Farley

3,656

Bella D. Goren

3,720

Robert G. Gwin

13,402

Bruce A. Smith

21,148

Rudy M.J. van der Meer

11,452

Bhavesh V. (Bob) Patel (1)

123,367

Kevin W. Brown

134,389

Jeffrey A. Kaplan

8,137

Timothy D. Roberts

41,696

James L. Gallogly

60,846

Karyn F. Ovelmen

8,088

Craig B. Glidden

11,157

William B. Allen

9,881

All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group
(27 persons) (2)(3)

582,360 

(1)Back to ContentsMr. Bindra’s ownership includes 9,200 shares owned by the Bindra Family Revocable Trust. Mr. Bindra disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Patel’s ownership includes 61,810 shares held in a family trust. Mr. Patel disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein.
(2)Includes beneficial ownership of shares that may be acquired upon exercise of options within 60 days of March 3, 2016 and shares that are issuable under restricted stock units within 60 days of March 3, 2016. For Mr. Gwin, the numbers presented include 3,003 restricted stock units, for Mr. Benet, the numbers include 1,560 restricted stock units and for the remainder of the Supervisory Board Members (Messrs. Aigrain, Bindra, Buchanan, Carroll, Cooper, Smith and van der Meer and Ms. Dicciani, Ms. Farley and Ms. Goren), the numbers presented include 1,647 restricted stock units. For Mr. Patel, the numbers presented include 47,723 stock options. For Mr. Gallogly, the numbers presented include 37,576 stock options. The numbers for Mr. Glidden include 5,482 stock options; and the numbers for Mr. Roberts include 18,945 stock options and 8,561 restricted stock units. The numbers for all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group include 127,793 stock options and 31,069 restricted stock units.
(3)Thomas Aebischer, Dan Coombs and Jim Guilfoyle are all executive officers included in the 27 persons disclosed. Their information is not separately disclosed in the table above, as SEC rules require separate disclosure only for “named executive officers” as that term is defined by the SEC. However, as Messrs. Aebischer, Coombs and Guilfoyle are all nominees to the Management Board, we have separately disclosed their equity interests in the Company as follows: Mr. Aebischer does not own any shares, Mr. Coombs owns 560 shares and Mr. Guilfoyle owns an aggregate of 6,804 shares, including 3,831 stock options exercisable within 60 days.

PERSONS OWNING MORE THAN 5% OF LYONDELLBASELL SHARES

The table below shows information for shareholders known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our shares as of March 3, 2016.

   Shares Beneficially Owned 

Name and Address

  Number   Percentage (1) 

Certain affiliates of Access Industries, LLC (2)

   80,943,366     18.8

730 Fifth Ave., 20th Floor

New York, NY 10019

    

FMR LLC (3)

   27,917,230     6.5

82 Devonshire Street

Boston, MA 02109

    

The Vanguard Group (4)

   22,919,629     5.3

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

    

(1)All percentages are based on 430,449,954 shares outstanding as of March 3, 2016.
(2)Access Industries is a privately-held U.S. industrial group which controls directly or indirectly AI International Chemicals S.à r.l. and certain other entities that are recordholders of our outstanding shares (collectively, the “Access Recordholders”). Len Blavatnik controls Access Industries and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by one or more of the Access Recordholders. Access Industries and each of its affiliated entities and the officers, partners, members and managers thereof (including, without limitation, Mr. Blavatnik), other than the applicable Access Recordholder, disclaim beneficial ownership of any shares owned by the Access Recordholders.
(3)Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016 by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2015, on behalf of its direct and indirect subsidiaries including Crosby Advisors LLC, FIAM LLC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company, Fidelity Management Trust Company, Inc., FMR Co., Inc. and Strategic Advisors, Inc. The shareholder reports sole voting power with respect to 1,553,810 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 27,917,230 shares.
(4)Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016 by The Vanguard Group reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2015, on behalf of its direct and indirect subsidiaries including Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia, LTD. The shareholder reports sole voting power with respect to 685,322 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 22,190,747 shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our Supervisory Directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common shares to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common shares (Forms 3, 4 and 5) with the SEC and the NYSE. All such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all such forms that they file.

Based on a review of the reports filed, information of the Company, and written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, our Supervisory Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders timely filed all reports they were required to file under Section 16(a).

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Page
Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

27

Executive Summary

Key Performance Highlights

27

Key Compensation Highlights

28

Our 2015 Say-on-Pay Vote

30

Our Compensation Practices

31

Our Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Philosophy – Pay for Performance Alignment

31

Executive Compensation Program Design Overview

32

Strategy and Design of Executive Compensation

32

Performance Measures

32

Administration of Executive Compensation Program

Overview

34

Compensation Peer Group

35

Our Executives’ 2015 Compensation

Base Salary

35

Annual Cash Bonus

35

Company Performance

36

Award Unit Performance

37

Individual Performance Rating Modifier

40

2015 Named Executive Annual STI Bonus Payout Calculations

40

2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards

2015 Equity Award Mix

2015 Annual Equity Award Grants and One-Time Equity Grants


41

41


Performance Share Units (PSUs)

43

Payouts under the 2013-2015 PSU Performance Cycle

44

Restricted Stock Units, or RSUs

44

Stock Options

45

Other Compensation Matters

Other Benefits

Share Ownership Guidelines


45

46


Claw-Back Policy

46

Prohibition on Insider Trading

46

Tax Matters

47

Recent Changes to Compensation Practices

47

Executive Changes

47

Executive Compensation Tables

Overview

48

Summary Compensation Table

49

Grants of Plan-Based Awards during 2015

52

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2015

53

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

55

Pension Benefits

56

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in 2015

57

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

57

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Overview

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our executive compensation policies and practices and focuses on 2015 compensation for those executives that are “named executive officers” as defined by the SEC. The Company experienced several executive changes in 2015 and, as a result of the SEC’s rules, must include information regarding current executive officers and certain executives who left the Company during 2015. Generally, the CD&A discusses and analyzes compensation decisions for the CEO, the CFO and the three most highly paid executives other than the CEO and CFO. Throughout this CD&A, we discuss the compensation of the following individuals:

Bob Patel – Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Management Board

Kevin Brown – Executive Vice President of Global Manufacturing & Refining

Jeff Kaplan – Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

Tim Roberts – former Executive Vice President of Global Olefins & Polyolefins

Although the following individuals were only with the Company for a portion of the year, they are also considered named executive officers under SEC rules: Jim Gallogly, former CEO who retired in January 2015; Karyn Ovelmen, former CFO who left the Company in May 2015; and Craig Glidden, former Chief Legal Officer, who retired in February 2015.

Finally, SEC rules require that we include Billy Allen, our VP – Finance, as a named executive as a result of his signing the certifications required under Sections 302 and 906 for our second and third quarter 2015 Forms 10-Q while we conducted our search for a new CFO.

In this CD&A, we begin with an executive summary to highlight our performance in 2015, which is what the most significant compensation decisions were based on. We then give highlights of compensation matters in 2015 and an overview of our program and practices. The remaining discussion of our executive compensation is meant to provide an explanation of how we pay our executives, what we pay them and why we paid them what we did.

Executive Summary

Key Performance Highlights

Our executives are paid for performance. The design and philosophy of our executive compensation programs is to align the interests of our executives with the long-term owners of our Company. Although not a measure used for our executive compensation program, we have included the comparison of the Company’s five-year total shareholder return as compared to the S&P 500 and the S&P 500 Chemicals Indices below, as we believe it shows our executives’ pay is aligned with shareholder value.

In 2015, we returned over

$6 billion of cash to
shareholders through
dividends and share
repurchases.

LOGO

*Assumes that $100 was invested as of December 31, 2010 and that all dividend payments were reinvested.

Company 2015 Performance

Our Company’s financial and operating performance during 2015 was exceptional.

With respect to nearly all of the measures used to determine success under our annual and long-term incentive programs, results were above expectations, improved as compared to prior years, or showed differential performance as compared to industry peers.

The four key performance measures used in our executive compensation programs in 2015 were:

•   Health, Safety & Environmental (“HSE”) Performance,

•   Cost Performance,

•   Business Results Performance, and

•   Return on Assets.

HSE Performance

-   Top decile performance as compared to industry peers

-   Fewer injuries than in 2014

-   Continued best in class performance in the areas of process safety and environmental performance

Cost Performance

-   Fixed costs below inflation over the last five years

-   SG&A as a percentage of revenues lowest among chemical company peers

-   Fixed costs in line with budget

Business Results Performance

-   Fourth consecutive year of record EBITDA

-   Fewer lost profit opportunities than in 2014

Return on Assets

-   18% improvement over three year period for chemical operations, as compared to 2% improvement of chemical peers

-   9% improvement over three year period for refining operations, as compared to 6% decline of refining peers

Key Compensation Highlights

The Company experienced several management changes in 2015, including the appointment of a new CEO and Chief Legal Officer and the departure of other executives. In addition to the changes in management, 2015 was a transition year for executive compensation matters because it was the fifth year anniversary of the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy. When the Company emerged from bankruptcy in 2010, grants of stock options and restricted stock units, or RSUs, were made to a number of executives, including Messrs. Patel, Brown, Kaplan and Glidden. The 2010 stock options vested ratably over a three year period beginning in 2012. The 2010 restricted stock units vested after a five year period, in 2015. The 2010 awards were designed to recruit, ensure retention and allow individuals to share in potential upside in an extremely uncertain time in the Company’s history. The value of the awards was based on a percentage of the executives’ 2010 base salary that

was meant to cover five years’ worth of annual grants. Any executive who received those grants did not receive any other annual grants of stock options or RSUs between 2010 and 2014.

As a result of the management changes and the need for new awards that provide long-term retention and incentive value to our executives, the Compensation Committee decided that one-time grants of both stock options and RSUs were warranted for some of the named executives. In 2015, Mr. Patel, Mr. Brown, Mr. Roberts and Mr. Glidden each received one-time awards. The vesting of these awards begins on the first anniversary of the grant date and continues over a five year period. In the first year, only ten percent vest, in the second year, fifteen percent vest, and the remaining 75% of the awards vest in equal increments in the third, fourth and fifth years. More information about these equity awards can be found under “2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

The compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2015 were focused on performance based compensation. The Committee determined the form and amount of compensation for the named executives by considering the best way to drive performance and create shareholder value. The compensation also is designed to allow our executives to share in that value to the extent it is achieved.

The chart below shows the target compensation of Mr. Patel, our CEO, for 2015. The target compensation includes base salary, the target amount of his annual cash bonus, the target amount of performance share units, or PSUs, the value of the annual grants of stock options and RSUs and the value of the one-time grants of stock options and RSUs discussed above.

Approximately 6% of our

CEO’s 2015 target

compensation was fixed in the

form of base salary.

The value of the remaining

target compensation was in the

form of awards that are earned

based on successfully achieving

results or the value of which is

dependent on our stock price.

LOGO

The amounts ultimately earned and received by Mr. Patel may differ significantly from his target compensation. Throughout this CD&A, we discuss the target amount of our named executives’ compensation because those are the amounts that the Compensation Committee determined to be appropriate levels of pay for our named executives. However, those are not the amounts that our executives actually received in 2015. The table above shows that 86%, or $18.875 million, of Mr. Patel’s 2015 target compensation was in the form of stock options, RSUs and PSUs. The stock options and the RSUs begin vesting in 2016 and continue to vest through 2020, which means that Mr. Patel will realize that compensation over a five year period. Further, he will only be able to realize value of the stock options if the market price of our shares after the options vest is greater than the price when the options were granted. Additionally, the number of shares earned under PSUs will be determined by the Compensation Committee after the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2017, and can range from zero to 200% of target. The value ultimately realized by Mr. Patel under the PSUs will depend on the number of shares earned and the market price of the shares when the Committee makes its determination.

LOGO

2015 annual bonus paid out at 208% of target;

Restricted stock units granted in 2010 vested;

PSU award granted in 2013 with a three-year performance period ended December 31, 2015 paid out at 195% of target; and

Mr. Patel did not exercise any stock options in 2015.

Our 2015 Say-on-Pay Vote

At our 2015 annual meeting, more than 98% of the votes cast voted in favor of the 2014 compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee believes that the strong support indicates that shareholders approve of our compensation strategy and programs.

The Company values the insights we gain through dialogue with our investors and will continue to consider shareholder views about our core principles and objectives when determining executive compensation.

Our Compensation Practices

We believe our executive compensation program and practices support our philosophy of pay for performance and reflect best governance practices.

What we do:What we don’t do
ü We link a significant amount of our executives’ compensation to financial, business and strategic goals.X We don’t have a high percentage of fixed compensation, meaning a significant portion of our executives’ compensation is at-risk.
ü We grant PSUs, RSUs and stock options to reward sustained future performance in addition to rewarding and incentivizing current year.X We don’t exclusively grant time-vested awards, and we include awards that require performance evaluations and stock price appreciation.
ü Our Compensation Committee annually reviews our executives’ compensation to evaluate their target compensation relative to other executives within the Company and their peers at other companies.X We don’t use a peer group composed of companies significantly larger than ours and we don’t make lock-step changes based on peer groups.
ü We include a “double-trigger” vesting in our LTI plan for change-in-control events.X We don’t provide for excise tax-gross ups for change-in-control or terminations.
ü We include claw-backs in our programs that allow us to recover performance based compensation in various circumstances.X We don’t allow our officers and directors to hedge our stock.
ü Our Compensation Committee has retained an independent consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook & Co.”) to advise on executive compensation matters.X We don’t use short-term vesting for stock awards.

Our Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Philosophy – Pay for Performance Alignment

Our overriding philosophy on executive compensation is to pay based on performance. Our executive compensation program is designed to provide target compensation that is more heavily weighted to incentive and equity compensation. We believe that making a higher percentage of our executives’ compensation dependent upon performance:

ensures that executives focus on achieving measurable Company objectives on both an absolute basis, and relative to industry peers, as well as individual performance objectives;

fosters and supports a high-performing culture that attracts and retains highly qualified executive talent;

aligns executives’ incentives with the creation of shareholder value through both short and long-term incentive plans; and

ensures we pay for performance.

The Company’s commitment to pay based on performance is evidenced in the potential for difference between target pay and realized pay. Failing to meet performance expectations can significantly affect payout amounts and would result in our named executives realizing substantially less compensation than executives in similar positions at other publicly traded companies.

Executive Compensation Program Design Overview

Our executive compensation program consists of three primary elements:

LOGO

In 2015 the Compensation Committee tied a significant portion of our executives’ compensation to the achievement of the Company’s performance, both annual and long-term, in the form of bonuses and PSUs.

The earned amount of annual STI bonuses was based on:

the Company’s performance in the areas of HSE performance, cost discipline and business results;

the performance of business units and staff functions in the areas of HSE performance, cost discipline, business results and customer service; and

the executives’ individual contributions to the Company.

PSUs granted in 2015 have performance measures based on the Company’s differential performance in the areas of cost discipline and return on assets (“ROA”) as compared to industry peers over the three year period ended December 31, 2017.

The PSUs that had a three year performance period ended December 31, 2015 that were paid out in February 2016 also had performance measures based on our differential performance as compared to industry peers in the areas of cost discipline and ROA.

Our named executives also were granted stock options and RSUs. Stock options and RSUs are time based vesting awards. The value of the awards realized by the executives, if any, is based on the market price of our shares when those awards vest and are meant to align our executives’ interests with long-term shareholder value.

Strategy and Design of Executive Compensation

Executive’s target compensation is set at or around the median of peers. Target compensation includes a named executive’s base salary; the dollar value of target annual bonus; and target LTI awards in the form of stock options, RSUs and PSUs, all as a percentage of base salary. The Company’s performance based compensation does not pay out based on the achievement of threshold, target and maximum levels. Under those types of formulaic programs, achievement of certain numerical targets of performance can guarantee payouts based on a threshold being met, a target being met, and then a maximum payout if performance exceeds a target to a certain extent.

The Company’s programs allow the Compensation Committee to use its discretion to determine whether the Company and the executives have earned payouts and to what extent those payouts are earned – generally based on differential performance.

Performance Measures

Our incentive compensation includes stock options and RSUs, both of which are time-based vesting awards. Stock options and RSUs provide retention value and compensate executives based on the value of our stock price. Stock options in particular align executives’ interests with shareholders over the longer term because they will only provide value if the market price of our stock increases over time.

Our other incentive compensation includes our annual bonuses and PSUs. The annual bonuses focus on performance over the short term, while the PSUs measure performance over a three year period. We believe the

mix of these awards provides a balance to incentivize our executives in both the shorter and longer term. These awards are earned based on the Company’s success in key performance measures, as shown below:

Annual Cash Bonuses (STI Program)

Company

Performance

50% of STI

HSE performance (25% of Company Performance) – The safety of our employees and the protection of the communities in which we operate is paramount to our operations. Our focus on health, safety and environmental matters is part of our Operational Excellence culture that allows us to run safely and efficiently, without downtimes and disruptions that impede our ability to take advantage of the markets in which we sell our products.
Cost discipline (25% of Company Performance) – As a commodity chemical company with refining operations, cost discipline is vital. Our view is that in good times and in down cycles, we must be cognizant of our cost structure and control the controllable to offset against the volatility of the markets for our feedstocks and products.
Business results (50% of Company Performance) – We use EBITDA as the predominant measure to gauge our financial results, as we believe it is the appropriate measure of our operating profitability. Our business results are measured by how we performed against our industry peers and in the economic environment during the year. Also included in business results is the amount of lost profit opportunities during the year and benchmarking against industry peers.

Award Units Performance

50% of STI*

HSE performance – All business units and functions also are measured on how well they upheld our Operational Excellence and HSE values.
Cost discipline – Each business unit and function has its own budget and business leaders are held accountable for the costs over which they have supervision.
Business results or Customer satisfaction – Our business units are all held accountable for their own profitability and the staff functions that support the businesses and the Company generally are judged on how well they provided that support.

*The percentages of HSE performance, Cost discipline and Business results or Customer satisfaction differ for different business units and staff functions, as described under “Our 2015 Executive Compensation Program – Annual Cash Bonus Award – Award Unit Performance.”

PSUs, or Performance Share Units, Payout in Shares and Vest after a Three-Year Performance Period

Costs

33% of PSUs

We look at our fixed costs over a three-year performance period as compared to a group comprised only of industry peers. The three-year period allows executives to have a longer-term view, which helps sustain performance and focus on longer-term value. Measuring our performance only as compared to the peer group drives our goal of being the best in what we do.

Return on Assets

67% of PSUs

As a manufacturing company, we believe that ROA is a good indication of how efficiently we manage our assets. Just as with the cost measure under the PSUs, we look at ROA over a three-year period to focus on more than just short-term results and to require sustained performance. Also, measuring ROA only against a group of industry peers incentivizes management to take actions that will achieve differential performance.

Administration of Executive Compensation Program

Overview

The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program principles and philosophies, including the approval of incentives design and performance measures. The Compensation Committee receives input from the Company’s independent committee consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook & Co.”). In this role, Cook & Co.:

provides advice, research and analytical services on subjects such as trends in executive compensation, executive compensation program design and peer group benchmarking;

participates in Compensation Committee meetings;

performs other work, as requested by the Compensation Committee; and

provides the Nominating & Governance Committee, when requested, with information and advice regarding the compensation of the members of the Supervisory Board.

The Compensation Committee also relies on the CEO to:

•    provide input on the strategy, design and performance under incentive programs; and

•    submit an annual self-assessment and performance evaluations and assessments of all of the other named executives.

In addition, the CEO works in conjunction with the Senior Vice President – Strategic Planning & Transactions to provide the Compensation Committee with analyses of the Company’s performance as compared to peers, including industry and Company specific information necessary for relative performance evaluations. Finally, the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer provides calculations, comparator group data and general recommendations for pay practice and plan design recommendations generally.

With such input, the Compensation Committee:

•    recommends the compensation (including base salary, annual cash incentives and equity awards) for all of our executive officers;

•    determines and recommends the structure for delivering compensation opportunities, including forms of awards and terms and conditions as well as performance measures of awards; and

•    considers all other arrangements, policies and practices related to our executive compensation program.

Independence of Cook & Co.

In 2011, the Compensation Committee adopted a written policy to ensure independence of any executive compensation consultant. The Committee has considered the independence of Cook & Co. in light of SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, including:

•      other services provided to us by Cook & Co.;

•      fees paid by us as a percentage of Cook & Co.’s total revenue;

•      policies or procedures of Cook & Co. that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest;

•      any business or personal relationships between the senior advisor of the consulting team with a member of the Compensation Committee;

•      any Company stock owned by the senior advisor or any member of his immediate family; and

•      any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the senior advisor.

The Compensation Committee concluded that the work performed by Cook & Co. and its senior advisor involved in the engagement did not raise any conflict of interest.

Compensation Peer Group

In reviewing our named executives’ compensation and our compensation programs generally, the Committee uses a group of companies consisting of fourteen publicly traded, similarly sized companies (the “Compensation Peer Group”).

The Compensation Committee uses the Compensation Peer Group to gauge market competitiveness, but does not use the Compensation Peer Group to make lock-step changes in executive compensation. To the contrary, the Company’s philosophy over the last several years has been to set total target compensation around the median of target compensation of executives in the Compensation Peer Group. Actual compensation earned or realized is based on achievements and success of the Company and the individual, as well as any increases in our stock price. Conversely, non-performance, or the Company or an executive failing to differentiate performance, will mean our executives are paid less than executives at other companies.

2015 Compensation Peer Group
3MDow ChemicalMonsanto
Air Products and ChemicalsDuPontPhillips 66
AlcoaHoneywellPPG Industries
CaterpillarInternational PaperPraxair
Johnson ControlsValero Energy

Our Executives’ 2015 Compensation

Base Salary

We pay base salaries to our named executive officers to provide them with sufficient, regularly paid income for performing day-to-day responsibilities. As executives assume more responsibilities within the Company, a smaller percentage of their total target compensation will be from base salary. The Company generally targets the median of salaries for similarly situated executives in our peer group in determining the base salaries paid to executives.

The Compensation Committee approves increases to named executives’ base salaries through annual merit increases and as individual circumstances warrant, including increased responsibilities and promotions. In 2015, each of Messrs. Patel, Brown, Kaplan and Roberts received increases to their base salaries due to promotions and increased responsibilities. Messrs. Gallogly and Glidden and Ms. Ovelmen did not receive increases as a result of their departures from the Company in 2015 and Mr. Allen received an annual merit increase. The table below shows the base salaries approved by our Compensation Committee for our named executive officers for 2015. The table also shows the increases from their 2014 base salaries and their 2015 base salaries as compared to similarly situated executives in the Compensation Peer Group.

Name  2015 Base Salary   Increase from 2014   2015 Base Salary as
Compared to Median
Base Salary of Peers
in Compensation Peer
Group
 

B. Patel

  $1,2500,000     104%     18% below median  

K. Brown

  $550,000     7%     21% below median  

J. Kaplan

  $485,000     39%     23% below median  

T. Roberts

  $700,000     14%     10% below median  

B. Allen

  $319,000     2%     21% below median  

Annual Cash Bonus

The CEO and each named executive officer has a target annual cash bonus amount that is set as a percentage of base salary. Target percentages were first determined based on market comparisons for similar positions when the individuals joined the Company. Changes to those targeted amounts are made for promotions, increased responsibilities or other job changes.

In 2015, Mr. Patel’s target bonus was increased from 80% to 150% of base salary as a result of his promotion to CEO. Other increases to targeted percentages included the following: 75% to 80% for Mr. Brown when he took over responsibility for Global Manufacturing; 50% to 75% for Mr. Kaplan when he was promoted to Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer; and 80% to 85% for Mr. Roberts when he assumed responsibility for our Olefins & Polyolefins operations globally. There were no changes to the target bonuses of Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen, Mr. Glidden or Mr. Allen in 2015 because they either left the Company or there were no changes to their job responsibilities.

The target amount of each named executive’s bonus, as a percentage of base salary, for 2015 is shown below. Named executives can earn from 0 to 200% of their target bonus based on Company and Award Unit performance, and then from 0 to 1.5 times that amount depending on personal performance, which results in a total payout 0-300% of target. Also shown in the table is how the named executives’ target cash compensation, which is base salary plus target bonus, compares to the median of the target cash compensation of their peers in the Compensation Peer Group.

Name

2015 Target  Bonus
(as percentage of
base salary)
2015 Target Cash Compensation
as Compared to Median Target
Cash Compensation of Peers in
Compensation Group

B. Patel

150%16% below median

K. Brown

80%16% below median

J. Kaplan

75%23% below median

T. Roberts

85%9% below median

B. Allen

50%21% below median

The Compensation Committee decides the actual bonuses paid to each of the named executives by determining performance at the Company level, the Award Unit level (as described below) and at the individual level, according to the following:

LOGO

Company Performance

At the Company level, three key measures have been established: HSE performance, Costs and Business performance. Each category considers Company performance in a different way, which reinforces success across multiple perspectives.

The three measures combined constitute the Company Results for determining bonuses. As the most visible indicator of financial performance and value to shareholders, Business performance makes up 50% of the total Company Results, with the remainder divided equally between Costs and HSE performance. The total Company Results result can range from 0% to 200% of the target. For 2015, the Compensation Committee determined the Company Results to be 163% of the target, as detailed below.

HSE PerformanceCostsBusiness Performance

Result = 150% of target

Result = 130% of target

Result = 185% of target

In determining the result of the Company’s HSE performance, the Committee discussed performance with the HSE Committee of the Supervisory Board and considered overall HSE performance statistics. These statistics included relative ranking as compared to industry peers as it relates to process safety incidents and individuals’ safety as measured by total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”). Also considered was the Company’s year-over-year performance in the areas of process safety incidents, TRIR and environmental incidents and the severity of any incidents. The Company’s improvements and relative performance led to the 150%.In determining the result of the Company’s Costs performance, the Committee reviewed and discussed fixed costs as compared to peers, looking at SG&A as a percentage of revenues. The Committee also compared the Company’s costs trend and actual costs as compared to its budget. The Company’s SG&A as a percentage of revenues were well below the industry averages. Fixed costs were below the inflationary trend and in line with budget, leading to the result of 130%.In determining the result of the Company’s Business performance, the Compensation Committee looked first at absolute performance, which was a fifth consecutive year of record EBITDA.* The Committee also considered relative change year-over-year in EBITDA as compared to its peers. Finally, the Committee looked at the Company’s lost profit opportunities, which are business interruptions or events, including project delays or manufacturing issues, that prevent the Company from taking advantage of then current market (or contracted) prices. The performance against peers and decline in lost profit opportunities led to the result of 185%.

* The Company defines EBITDA as income from continuing operations plus interest expense (net), provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation & amortization.

Award Unit Performance

In addition to evaluating the Company’s performance as a whole, the CEO and each of the other named executive officers were evaluated on the performance of the business or service functions for which they have direct responsibility, which are the Award Units. This ties their bonuses more directly to their personal performance and the performance of the functions they control or supervise.

In 2015, the Company had 70 separate Award Units. Each Award Unit is classified as a “Business,” “Manufacturing” or “Services” unit. Business Award Units represent commercial operations; Manufacturing Award Units represent our plants’ and sites’ operations; and Services Award Units represent staff and administrative functions within the Company, such as Finance, Legal and Supply Chain.

Each Award Unit is assessed on certain performance measures, which are weighted differently depending on the type of Award Unit. The Award Units can earn from 0 to 200% of target for each performance measure. The performance measures and weighting of each for each type of Award Unit are shown below.

Business Award Units  Manufacturing Award Units  Services Award Units 

HSE

   20 HSE   30 HSE   20

Costs

   35 Costs   35 Costs   40

Business performance

   45 Business performance   35 Customer Satisfaction   40

Mr. Patel, as CEO and Chairman of the Management Board, has supervisory responsibility for all Award Units within the Company. As a result, his Award Unit calculation was the weighted average of all 70 Award Units of 149% of target. The following table shows the Award Units under the responsibility of each of the named executives other than Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden, which are discussed below.

Name

  

Award Units

  Award Unit
Type
  Weighting  2015 Award
Unit
Performance
 

K. Brown

  Global Projects  Services   15  123
  Global Engineering Services  Services   5  153
  Refining Supply, Products & Planning  Business   10  152
  17 Manufacturing Sites in EAI1  Manufacturing   32.5  143
  22 Manufacturing Sites in the Americas2  Manufacturing   37.5  144

J. Kaplan

  Legal  Services   80  160
  Public Affairs  Services   20  146

T. Roberts

  PE Americas  Business   12.5  160
  PP & Catalloy Americas  Business   5  167
  Olefins Americas  Business   30  150
  PP Argentina  Business   2.5  141
  Australia Manufacturing  Manufacturing   0.75  165
  PP Australia  Business   0.75  163
  JVs and International Marketing  Business   6  165
  Global Compounds  Business   10  139
  PE Europe & PB-1  Business   8.75  169
  PP& Catalloy EAI  Business   8.75  157
  Olefins EAI  Business   15  152

B. Allen

  Finance  Services   100  150

1.The 17 Manufacturing – EAI Award Units include the Company’s Bayreuth, Milton Keynes, Suzhou, BAPT (Rayong), Nansha (Guangzhou), Tarragona, Berre, Brindisi, Carrington, Ferrara, Fos, Frankfort, Ludwigshafen, Maasvlakte & Botlek (BoMa), Moerdijk, MuMu and Wesseling sites or facilities.
2.The 22 Manufacturing – Americas Award Units include the Company’s Houston refinery, Bayport EO, Bayport PP, Bayport PO, LaPorte, Pipeline, Chocolate Bayou Polymers, Matagorda, Victoria, Edison, Petroken, Jackson, Mansfield, Altamira, Channelview, Clinton, Corpus Christi, Lake Charles, Morris, Tuscola, Newark and Fairport Harbor sites or facilities.

Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden each received pro-rated bonus payments for 2015. Mr. Gallogly’s Award Unit payout was based on the weighted average of all Award Units and equaled 149% of target; Ms. Ovelmen’s was split 60/40 between Finance and IT Award Units for an Award Unit score of 147% of target; and Mr. Glidden’s was split 80/20 between Legal and Public Affairs Award Units for an Award Unit score of 157% of target.

The table below describes the analyses and discussions of factors used for determining how Award Units performed in each of the performance measures. Senior management of the Company, led by the CEO, goes through an intensive process of reviewing the performance of each of the 70 Award Units within each performance measure. The results of these reviews are presented to the Compensation Committee for its review and approval.

HSE Performance of Award Units

Performance:

HSE performance for all Award Units ranged from 75% to 200%.

Weighted average HSE performance for all Award Units was 150%.

Considerations:

•     Absolute performance and trends in performance;

•     The number (or absence) of injuries, process safety incidents and environmental incidents;

•     The severity of any of the above events within each Award Unit that contributed to the Company’s overall HSE performance;

•     The degree of difficulty in achieving our stated goal of zero incidents, such as comparing office locations and manufacturing locations; and

•     The extent to which performance was improved over prior years.

Costs Performance of Award Units

Performance:

Costs performance for all Award Units ranged from 95% to 145%.

Weighted average Cost performance for all Award Units was 127%.

Considerations:

•     Award Units’ operating, selling, general & administrative and other expenses within the year, as applicable;

•     Whether the particular Award Unit met its budget for the year;

•     The Award Unit’s success in controlling costs, including any specific actions taken by the Award Units in this effort;

•     Any process improvements, reorganizations, and other factors that may have long-term beneficial impact notwithstanding short-term costs;

•     The Award Units’ ability to absorb unexpected costs; and

•     Performance versus peer benchmarks.

Business Results of Award Units

Performance:

Business performance for all Award Units ranged from 127% to 200%.

Weighted average Business performance for all Award Units was 172%.

Considerations:

•     Each particular operations’ EBITDA within the year, primarily as compared to the prior year, taking into account any positive or negative Company specific, industry, or general economic conditions;

•     Specific actions taken by the Award Unit to increase EBITDA, including process improvements, reorganizations, contract negotiations, business development efforts and margin improvements;

•     The reliability of the Manufacturing Award Units’ facilities and any specific outperformance of industry conditions by Award Units; and

•     Annual return on assets as compared to peers.

Customer Satisfaction of Award Units

Performance:

Customer Satisfaction for Services Award Units ranged from 85% to 195%.

Weighted average Customer Satisfaction for Services Award Units was 163%.

Considerations:

•     Ratings given by executive officers and other senior leaders of the Company for each of the Company’s corporate staff and administrative Award Units. The ratings for Services Award Units were influenced by the internal Company clients’ satisfaction and the success of each department in meeting its goals for the year. The considerations for the ratings included specific action items by the departments to further the interests of the Company and to meet clients’ expectations.

Individual Performance Rating Modifier

The initial percentage of named executives’ target bonuses earned based on Company results and Award Unit results can then be modified by the Individual Performance Rating Modifier. The Individual Performance Modifier can range from 0 to 1.5, based on the named executive’s individual performance. As a general matter, an executive’s modifier is based on whether he has met the expectations of his position and can reflect a range of unacceptable to exceptional performance.

The Compensation Committee determines the CEO’s Individual Performance Rating Modifier based on individual goals that the CEO and the Committee have agreed on for the year as well as any other relevant factors, such as dealing with market and organizational challenges and unexpected developments. The CEO recommends Individual Performance Rating Modifiers for each of the other named executive officers that reports to him based in part on the individual goals the CEO and the named executive agreed on at the beginning of the year. The CEO’s assessment of each of the other named executives is reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee, taking into account the Committees’ own observations and analysis as part of the Supervisory Board’s oversight of the Company.

Individual performance goals include items designed to achieve performance for each named executive officer’s Award Units and matters necessary to a well-run organization, such as personnel and staffing issues, department initiatives, business process improvements, responses to economic conditions and other factors.

B. Patel

 

K. Brown

 

J. Kaplan

 

T. Roberts

 

B. Allen

1.33

 1.20 1.10 1.00 1.00

2015 Named Executive Annual STI Bonus Payout Calculations

Name Company Results
(50%)
  + Award Units
Results (50%)
  x  Individual
Modifier
  =  Percentage of Target
Bonus Earned
 

B. Patel

  81.5   +  74.5    x    1.33    =    208

K. Brown

  81.5   +  71    x    1.20    =    183

J. Kaplan

  81.5   +  78.5    x    1.10    =    176

T. Roberts

  81.5   +  77    x    1.00    =    159

B. Allen

  81.5   +  75    x    1.00    =    157

The calculations of the percentage of target bonus payable to Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden were based on the calculation that would have occurred had they remained employed for the full year, pro-rated for the number of days they worked, in each case with an Individual Performance Rating Modifier of 1.00.

2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards

2015 Equity Award Mix

We make grants under the LyondellBasell Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “LTI Plan”).

LOGO

The percentage breakouts of the different types of awards were determined by the Compensation Committee to be the most appropriate split between equity that is performance-based (PSUs) and those that are time-based (stock options and RSUs).

Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) – Performance-based awards that vest after a three year period, with the amount earned dependent on the Company’s performance in Cost discipline and Return on Assets as compared to industry peers.

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) – Time-based awards that vest after three years. RSUs provide retention value and encourage executives to consider long term success, strengthening their alignment of interests with shareholders, as the awards vest over a multi-year period, and their value is tied to the Company’s share price.

Non-qualified Stock Options (“Options”) – Time-based vesting awards that are intended to direct executives’ focus on increasing the market value of our shares. Options vest ratably over three years and only provide value to the executive if there is an appreciation of our stock price from the date of grant.

2015 Annual Equity Grants and One-Time Equity Grants

Grants of equity compensation generally occur at the first regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting in each calendar year. The value of equity awards, including stock options, RSUs and PSUs, is based on a targeted percentage of an executive’s base salary as of the date of grant. In most cases, a named executive officer’s targeted percentage was negotiated at the time of hire and in some cases, a minimum target percentage is included in an employment agreement.

The percentages of base salary used to determine grant date value may be increased from time to time by the Compensation Committee based on promotions or new responsibilities of our executives. In 2015, Messrs. Patel, Kaplan and Roberts’ target values were all increased as a result of their promotions and increased responsibilities as follows: Mr. Patel – 175% increased to 550%; Mr. Kaplan – 50% increased to 200%; and Mr. Roberts – 175 increased to 220%. The determination of these target percentages was made based on the increased level of responsibility of each of the individuals and a comparison to the named executives’ peers in the Compensation Peer Group.

Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden had LTI targets of 725%, 245% and 220%, respectively, and there was no change to their targets in 2015. None of them received annual equity grants in 2015 as a result of their departures from the Company. Mr. Brown’s LTI target of 200% and Mr. Allen’s LTI target of 100% of base salary were determined when they joined the Company and there was no change in 2015.

In addition to the annual equity awards, the Compensation Committee uses equity awards as part of new hire packages and may grant one-time equity awards in unique circumstances. In January 2015, Mr. Patel took over as CEO and Chairman of the Management Board. In connection with his appointment, the Compensation Committee awarded him one-time equity grants in the form of stock options and RSUs with an aggregate value of $12 million. Of this amount, 60% of the value, or $7.2 million, was in the form of RSUs and 40%, or $4.8 million, in the form of stock options. The RSUs and stock options vest over a five-year period, with 10% vesting

after one year, 15% vesting after two years, and the remaining 75% vesting ratably on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant. These awards were granted by the Committee as a means to incentivize Mr. Patel to promote longer-term value and give him the opportunity to share in the future success of the Company under his leadership. The Committee determined that the $12 million value, together with the vesting schedule weighted heavily towards the end of the five year term, was appropriate to retain, incentivize and provide potential reward to Mr. Patel, particularly because he had vested in all of his 2010 grants by April 2015 and grants outstanding were incremental awards for his promotions between 2010 and 2015.

The Committee also determined that it would be appropriate to grant Messrs. Brown, Roberts and Glidden one-time awards at the beginning of 2015. The one-time awards granted to Messrs. Brown, Roberts and Glidden were intended to promote stability, leadership and incentives to our highest ranking executives in a time of changed management and macroeconomic uncertainty. Additionally, the Committee believed these awards to be appropriate given that, in the case of Messrs. Brown and Glidden, no annual awards of stock options or RSUs had been made since 2010. The Committee determined the value of the awards of $2 million, $6 million and $5 million for Mr. Brown, Mr. Roberts and Mr. Glidden, respectively, by reviewing those named executives’ total target compensation, their job responsibilities and the parity of their total compensation as compared to all of our named executives. Mr. Glidden retired in February 2015 and forfeited 94% of the awards he was granted in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the LTI plan and the award agreements. Mr. Roberts left the Company in early 2016 and, pursuant to the terms of the LTI plan and the award agreements, forfeited 52% of the awards that were granted to him in 2015.

The 2015 equity grants for Messrs. Patel, Brown, Kaplan, Roberts and Allen are shown below. Also shown below is a comparison of the value of the regular, annual grants to our named executives, other than Mr. Allen, as compared to the value of annual long-term awards granted to their peers in the Compensation Peer Group. Mr. Allen’s comparison is based on a national, general industry survey conducted by Towers Watson. None of Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen or Mr. Glidden received annual grants in 2015.

Value of annual equity grants of $6.875 million is 23% below the median of long-term grants to peers.

* Includes one-time grants.

LOGO

Value of annual equity grants of $1.1 million is 39% below the median of long-term grants to peers.

* Includes one-time grants.

LOGO

Value of annual equity grants of $916 thousand is 39% below the median of long-term grants to peers.

LOGO

Value of annual equity grants of $1.54 million is 28% below the median value of long-term grants to peers.

* Includes one-time grants.

LOGO

Value of annual equity grants of $312 thousand is 25% below the median of long-term grants to peers.

LOGO

Performance Share Units, or PSUs

As described above, in 2015, one-half of the value of our named executives’ annual equity awards is in the form of PSUs. The number of units awarded is determined by multiplying half of the LTI target by the named executive’s base salary at date of grant, and dividing that amount by the fair market value of our stock on that day. Each unit deemed earned will pay out in one share at the end of the performance period. The performance period for the 2015 PSU awards ends on December 31, 2017.

The number of PSUs actually earned and the resulting shares issued to the executives is dependent upon Company performance as compared to industry peers, measured by Costs and ROA, weighted 33% and 67%, respectively. ROA is defined as operating EBITDA divided by operating costs. The Company’s performance is compared to the group of industry peers shown below (the “Comparative Peer Group”). The peer group is the same as in prior years, with the exception that Nova Chemicals is no longer included in the chemicals peers because it stopped publicly reporting its financial results.

Comparative Peer Group

Chemical Companies (Weighted 80%)

Refining Companies (Weighted 20%)

BASF

Borealis

Celanese Corp.

CP Chemical Co.

Dow Chemical

Eastman Chemical Corp.

ExxonMobil Chemical Segment

Huntsman Corp.

Ineos

Westlake Corp.

ALON USA Energy Inc.

Holly Frontier Corporation

Tesoro

Valero Energy Corp.

Western Refining Inc.

The earned percentage of a payout on PSUs can range from 0% – 200% and, as described above, is based on the Company’s performance as compared to industry peers. ROA and Costs were selected as measures for the PSUs because (i) evaluating the change in ROA from the beginning to the end of a performance period gives an indication as to how efficiently the Company has used its assets to generate revenue as compared to peers, and (ii) measuring the Company’s ability to control costs as compared to the Company’s peers over the performance period gives the Compensation Committee a means to judge the Company’s discipline over a cycle. PSUs pay out in one share of stock for each unit earned.

Payouts under the 2013-2015 PSU Performance Cycle

The PSUs granted to named executive officers in 2013 had a performance period that ended December 31, 2015 and paid out at 195% of target. The considerations of the Compensation Committee in determining the earned percentage for the PSU awards are discussed below.

Return on Assets – The Company’s relative change in its ROA for its chemical operations over the performance period was 18%, as compared to an average of 2% for the ten chemical companies in the Comparative Peer Group. On an absolute basis, the Company’s chemical operations’ ROA at the end of the performance was more than 200% greater than the average of the chemical peers.

The Company’s relative change in its ROA for is refining operations over the performance period was 9%, as compared to an average of negative 6% for the five refining companies in the Comparative Peer Group. On an absolute basis, the Company’s refining operations’ ROA at the end of the performance period was the same as the average of the refining company peers.

The Compensation Committee considered the Company’s outperformance of its industry peers shown above when determining whether the Company had successfully performed over the three year performance period. It also discussed market and economic factors that impacted the Company’s results, both positively and negatively, such as lower ethylene prices in the U.S. at the end of the period and unfavorable declines in the Maya 2-1-1 spread. The Committee also discussed whether and to what extent these or other factors also affected the industry peers.

Costs – The Compensation Committee reviewed cash fixed costs against the inflation trend and compared to peers in determining the Company’s success in cost discipline. The Company’s fixed costs continue to be below inflationary trends and, excluding certain special items, were in line with the Company’s budget.

Restricted Stock Units, or RSUs

The number of RSUs granted to our named executive officers is determined based on 25% of the value of their annual LTI target. The number is calculated by dividing that amount by the fair market value of our shares on the date of grant. The annual grants of RSUs in 2015 vest in full three years after the date of grant, subject to general vesting and forfeiture provisions. Upon vesting, holders of RSUs receive one share for each unit. Recipients of RSUs receive dividend equivalents on their units throughout the vesting period.

The calculation of the number of RSUs granted is shown below:

LOGO

As discussed above under “2015 Equity Grants,” certain of our executives also received one-time RSU grants in 2015.

Stock Options

The number of options granted to the named executive officers is also determined based on 25% of their annual LTI target. That dollar amount is divided by the Black Scholes value of options for the Company as of the date of grant, resulting in the number of stock options granted. The regular annual stock options granted to the named executive officers in 2015 vest ratably over a three year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. The exercise price of the options is the fair market value of the Company’s shares on the date of grant, and the options have a term of 10 years.

The calculation of the number of stock options granted is shown below:

LOGO

As discussed above under “2015 Equity Grants,” certain of our executives also received one-time stock option grants in 2015.

Other Compensation Matters

Other Benefits

Our Deferral Plan for U.S. employees includes a restoration feature that provides for Company contributions to the Deferral Plan on executives’ pay in excess of IRS limits at the same rates credited under our 401(k) plan and our defined benefit pension plan, which are 6% and 5%, respectively. The contributions by the Company are made on the amounts that exceed the IRS limits, regardless of whether the executive contributes any amounts to the Deferral Plan. Amounts contributed by the Company are unfunded and unsecured. Upon retirement eligibility, individuals receiving the contributions commence benefits, subject to any delays required under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

We have provided certain of our executive officers with up to $15,000 per year in financial planning assistance. Additionally, we provide for Company paid executive physicals.

In certain circumstances, we make tax equalization payments to compensate our executives for taxes for which they become liable as a result of doing business on behalf of the Company in jurisdictions other than their principal location. As an example, executives may be subject to taxation in New York for Company business they conducted there as a result of meetings in New York. The Compensation Committee has approved reimbursing the executives for additional taxes owed to jurisdictions other than their home state or country, including the grossing up of such amounts to make the executives whole. Such reimbursements and gross-ups are only after the executive has exhausted any offsetting tax credits available and only are made to the extent necessary to keep the executive in the same position the executive would have been if fully taxed only in the executive’s jurisdiction of residence.

In order to remain competitive and if unusual or special circumstances arise, we may determine to provide other perquisites to our named executive officers in the future.

As a global company with world-wide operations, we maintain an Expatriate Assignment Policy that provides for certain benefits to employees, including executive officers, assigned to work in jurisdictions other than their home countries. The benefits are broad-based and generally include payments designed to make them whole when a requested relocation would adversely affect their compensation due to increased costs of living and different tax regimes.

We also provide our named executives with other benefits available to our employees generally. These benefits include 401(k) plan matching contributions for U.S. employees, life and disability benefits, vacation pay, eligibility to participate in health and other welfare benefit plans, and pension plans.

Share Ownership Guidelines

The Company’s Share Ownership Guidelines provide that each year executive officers are prohibited from selling more than 50% of the net shares received upon vesting or exercise after the payment of exercise prices and withholding taxes during that year until certain levels of share ownership are reached. The share ownership levels are based on a multiple of base salary, as shown below. For purposes of the Guidelines, shares owned directly or beneficially and restricted stock units are counted toward ownership levels but stock options and performance share units are not. The current holdings of the named executives still with the Company show that, other than Mr. Kaplan, they have all exceeded their applicable ownership levels. Mr. Kaplan only became subject to the Guidelines as of March 2015, when he received his first stock option and RSU grants since 2010.

Title

Ownership Guideline

Executives’ Current Holdings
Chief Executive Officer6 x Base SalaryB. Patel – 12.1 x Base Salary
Executive Vice Presidents4 x Base SalaryK. Brown – 27.8 x Base Salary

J. Kaplan – 2.3x Base Salary

Senior Vice Presidents3 x Base Salary
Vice Presidents2 x Base SalaryB. Allen – 2.7 x Base Salary

Claw-Back Policy

Our Claw-Back Policy is applicable to all executive officers, including the named executives. Pursuant to the policy, for any awards granted after the date of the policy, if the Committee determines that any named executive has engaged in or benefitted from misconduct that materially increased the compensation he has received, including but not limited to in the event of a financial restatement, the Committee may seek to recover any and all affected payments.

Prohibition on Insider Trading and Hedging

The Company maintains an insider trading policy that prohibits the named executive officers from engaging in most transactions involving the Company’s shares during periods, determined by the Company, that those executives are most likely to be aware of material inside information. Named executive officers must clear all of their transactions in our shares with the Company’s Corporate Secretary’s office to ensure they are not transacting in our securities during a time that they may have material, nonpublic information.

Additionally, as a general matter, it is our policy that no transactions that reduce or cancel the risk of an investment in our shares, such as puts, calls and other exchange traded derivatives, or hedging activities that allow a holder to own a covered security without the full risks and rewards of ownership, will be approved. We consider it inappropriate for our executive officers to engage in short-term speculation in our securities based on

fluctuations in the market or to engage in other transactions in our securities that may lead to inadvertent violations of the insider trading laws. Accordingly, our Policy Prohibiting Insider Trading prohibits purchasing, selling or writing options on our securities or engaging in transactions in other third-party derivative securities with respect to our securities, including puts, calls, short sales, collars, forward sale contracts, and other short-term purchase or sale transactions. Transactions involving both the purchase and sale of our securities in the open market within a one week period are presumed to be prohibited “short-term purchase or sale transactions.”

Tax Matters

Our Compensation Committee believes it is appropriate to structure compensation of our executive officers in a manner that is in the best interests of the Company and its stakeholders. This means our compensation programs will be designed, in accordance with our compensation philosophy, to attract and retain highly qualified individuals and instill a performance culture throughout the organization. As a result, compensation of our executive officers may or may not be designed to be fully deductible in accordance with Section 162(m), as described below, depending on what the Compensation Committee determines to be in the best interests of the Company and our stakeholders.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code denies a compensation deduction for federal income tax purposes for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our CEO and the three other most highly compensated officers other than the CFO unless the compensation is “performance based” under the rules and regulations of the Internal Revenue Service.

Recent Changes to Compensation Practices

In 2015, the Compensation Committee approved a change to the form of PSU awards, effective for 2016 grants. Beginning with grants of PSUs in 2016, the units will receive dividend equivalents in the same amounts and at the same time dividends are paid to our shareholders. The dividend equivalents are invested in units, potentially increasing the payout of shares, if any, at the end of the performance period. On the dividend payment dates, the dividend equivalent amount will be divided by the fair market value of our shares on that date, and holders of PSUs will receive additional units of that amount. The units into which the dividend payments are converted are paid out after the three-year performance period and the Compensation Committee’s certification of results to determine how many units are actually earned.

In early 2016, the Committee also approved changes to the performance measures that will be used for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2018 for PSUs granted in 2016. The measures will include Return on Assets, Total Shareholder Return as compared to the Compensation Peer Group, Cost Competitiveness and Capital Project Execution. For earlier periods, the measures are ROA and Costs.

Executive Changes

In addition to the executive changes that occurred in 2015, certain additional changes occurred after the 2015 year end, as shown below.

Appointment of Thomas Aebischer as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer. On November 6, 2015, the Company announced that Mr. Thomas Aebischer had been appointed as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective January 1, 2016.

Departure of Tim Roberts, Executive Vice President – Global Olefins & Polyolefins. In January 2016, the Company announced the departure of Mr. Roberts from the Company. The Company also announced that Dan Coombs, previously Executive Vice President – Intermediates & Derivatives and Technology, would take over as

Executive Vice President – Global Olefins & Polyolefins and Technology. Finally, the Company announced that Jim Guilfoyle, previously Senior Vice President – Intermediates & Derivatives reporting to Mr. Coombs, would assume responsibility for the Intermediates & Derivatives business as well as the Company’s supply chain function and report directly to Mr. Patel.

Executive Compensation Tables

Overview

We are required to present compensation information in the tabular formats prescribed by the SEC. This format, including the tables’ column headings, may be different from the way we describe or consider elements and components of our compensation internally.

We believe the following information may be useful to an understanding of the tables presented in this section. The CD&A contains a discussion that should be read in conjunction with the compensation tables included in this section to gain a complete understanding of our executive compensation philosophy, programs and decisions.

Annual Bonuses – Our annual cash bonuses are earned and paid based on the achievement of performance goals. As a result, for SEC disclosure purposes they are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

In March 2016, we made the bonus payments to the named executives for 2015 performance, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Notwithstanding that the awards have been earned and paid, we are required to include the target and maximum dollar amounts that could have been paid for 2015 performance in the “Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards,” column in the “Grant of Plan-Based Awards in 2015” table. This disclosure enables readers to compare the amounts actually earned, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, to the named executives’ possible payments, as disclosed in the “Grant of Plan-Based Awards in 2015” table.

Equity Awards – The value of the equity awards included in the tables is the aggregate fair value of the awards on the date of grant, calculated pursuant to U.S. GAAP. SEC disclosure rules require us to include the aggregate grant date fair value, which is effectively the accounting value of the award over the entire time period that it is earned. This amount is required to be disclosed, notwithstanding that the executives are not entitled to the awards until they vest and for financial reporting purposes, we recognize compensation expense over the life of the awards as they are earned.

The values of equity awards included in the tables are neither guarantees of performance by the Company nor the actual compensation that may be earned by or paid to the executives. Instead, as described, the amounts represent the fair value of the awards for financial reporting purposes.

Although we consider all of our equity awards to be a form of incentive compensation because their value will increase as the market value of our shares increases, only awards with performance criteria are considered “equity incentive plan awards” for SEC disclosure purposes. As a result, only PSUs have been included as “Equity Incentive Plan Awards” in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015” table. Restricted stock units and stock options are disclosed in other tables, as applicable.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary  Stock
Awards (2)
  Option
Awards (3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(4)
  Change in
Pension
Value (5)
  All Other
Compensation
(6)
  Total 

Bob V. Patel – Chief Executive Officer

  

  2015    1,218,151    12,356,319    6,518,771    3,900,000    13,450    467,122    24,473,813  
  2014    609,000    375,118    75,006    1,053,885    13,822    1,193,897    3,320,728  
  2013    562,065    159,565    —      1,111,916    11,962    670,377    2,515,885  

Kevin W. Brown – Executive Vice President – Manufacturing & Refining

  

  2015    547,161    2,025,139    1,075,008    801,499    14,839    47,426    4,511,072  

Jeffrey A. Kaplan – Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

  

  2015    456,438    688,113    229,380    739,419    13,400    39,537    2,166,287  

Timothy D. Roberts – Executive Vice President – Global O&P

  

  2015    693,231    4,755,106    2,785,022    934,955    13,694    25,633    9,207,641  
  2014    608,954    787,558    262,522    923,794    13,717    52,409    2,648,954  
  2013    517,541    348,235    363,985    998,543    12,145    42,467    2,282,916  

James L. Gallogly (1) – Former Chief Executive Officer

  

  2015    69,808    —      —      126,937    5,275    679,730    881,750  
  2014    1,594,039    5,208,889    3,146,335    3,190,685    16,198    36,844    13,192,990  
  2013    1,500,000    1,500,043    —      5,625,000    14,113    501,217    9,146,617  

Karyn F. Ovelmen (1) – Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  

  2015    326,765    —      —      371,444    7,360    834,270    1,539,839  
  2014    765,723    1,371,341    457,080    884,630    13,292    93,067    3,585,133  
  2013    739,926    877,274    889,246    1,356,725    11,826    83,648    3,958,645  

Craig B. Glidden (1) – Former Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer

  

  2015    114,798    3,000,074    2,000,012    137,235    5,571    111,456    5,369,146  
  2014    657,192    351,694    —      1,185,364    15,518    74,110    2,283,878  
  2013    633,899    339,764    —      1,577,930    13,417    73,063    2,638,123  

William B. Allen, Jr. (1) – Vice President – Finance and Acting Principal Financial Officer

  

  2015    317,390    234,654    78,189    248,412    12,631    15,974    907,250  

(1)Mr. Gallogly retired effective January 12, 2015 and Mr. Glidden retired effective February 28, 2015. Ms. Ovelmen left the Company effective May 30, 2015. After Ms. Ovelmen’s departure, Mr. Allen, VP – Finance and principal accounting officer of the Company, executed the certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with the filing of the Company’s Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2015 as principal financial officer. Mr. Allen did not receive any additional compensation for his certifications and is included in this proxy statement as a result of the signing of such certifications.

(2)Stock awards granted to named executive officersNEOs in 20152021, 2022, and 2023 include RSUs and PSUs. The restricted stock units, or RSUs are granted under the LyondellBasell Industries Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTI”“LTIP”) and entitle the recipient to an equal number of shares upon vesting.of the Company’s stock when the RSUs vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. RSUs receive cash dividend equivalents at the same time dividends are paid on the Company’s stock. Amounts included in the table are  the aggregate grant date fair values of the awards calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The PSUs are performance share units, also granted under the LTI.LTIP. The PSUs entitle the recipient to a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the granted sharenumber of units, multiplied by an earned percentage whichthat can range from 0 to 200% of the targeted number of units based on Company performance. The PSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance period in the form of additional units. See Note 1716 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152023 (the “2023 Annual Report”) for a discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the awards.
There was no payout under the PSUs for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2021. The PSUs for the three-year performance periods ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023 paid out at 100% and 200%, respectively.

Annual grants of RSUs and PSUs are made at the first regularly scheduled C&TD Committee meeting of the calendar year. The following is the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs granted in 2023 if we assumed the maximum amounts (200% of target) will be earned: Peter Vanacker - $8,978,151; Michael McMurray - $2,775,140; Ken Lane - $2,201,335; Jim Guilfoyle - $1,942,151; Torkel Rhenman - $2,024,259.

Annual grants of these awards are made at the first regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting of the calendar year. In 2015, Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden did not receive annual grants. In January 2015, in connection with his promotion to CEO, Mr. Patel received one-time awards that included RSUs and stock options. These awards were in addition to the annual grant he also received. Messrs. Brown, Glidden and Roberts also received one-time awards consisting of RSUs and stock options in January 2015. Mr. Kaplan received grants in addition to his annual grant connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. His promotion was effective March 1, 2015 and the grants were made by the Committee at its May 2015 meeting. Mr. Kaplan’s awards included RSUs, PSUs and stock options.

The following table shows the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs granted in 2015 if we assumed the maximum amounts (200% of target) will be earned.

Name

(5)
Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value

Stock options are also granted under the LTIP and annual awards are made at the first regularly scheduled C&TD Committee meeting of
Award Assuming Highest Level the calendar year. The stock options vest ratably over a three-year period beginning with the first anniversary of
Performance Achieved ($)

B. Patel

6,875,014

K. Brown

1,100,146

J. Kaplan

917,483

T. Roberts

1,540,133

B. Allen

312,811

(3) the date of grant and expire after ten years. The amounts shown are the fair values of the stock option awards are the fair valueoptions on the date of grant, calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The fair values of stock options were estimatedcalculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We use the Black-Scholes formula to calculate an assumed value of the options for compensation expense purposes; because the formula uses assumptions, the fair values calculated are not necessarily indicative of the actual values of the stock options.

The assumptions used for the 2023 annual grants were: a dividend yield of 5%; a risk-free interest rate of 4.066%; an expected life of 5.7 years; and stock price volatility of 39.91%. See Note 16 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2023 Annual Report for a discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the awards.

The assumptions used for the one-time grants to Mr. Patel were: a dividend yield of 3%; a risk-free interest rate of 1.639%; an expected life of 6.7 years; and a stock price volatility of 37%. The assumptions used for the one-time grants awarded to Messrs. Brown, Glidden and Roberts were: a dividend yield of 3%; a risk-free interest rate of 1.619%; an expected life of 6.7 years; and a stock price volatility of 37%. The assumptions used for the annual grants awarded to Messrs. Patel, Brown, Kaplan, Roberts and Allen were: a dividend yield of 3%; a risk-free interest rate of 1.777%; an expected life of 6.0 years; and a stock price volatility of 37%. Finally, the assumptions used in Mr. Kaplan’s promotional award were: a dividend yield of 3%; a risk-free interest rate of 1.751%; an expected life of 6.0 years; and a stock price volatility of 36.3%. See Note 17 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for a discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the awards.

(4)(6)Amounts of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in 2015 are2023 include the annual STI bonuses paid out in March 20162024 for performance during 2015. Additionally, Mr. Kaplan’s 2013 performance award with a performance period ending December 31, 2015 was a cash-based award and the earned amount of that award of $134,217 is included in Mr. Kaplan’s amounts. All other named executives received PSUs, which are earned in shares, and are reflected in the “Options Exercised and Stock Vested” table.2023.

(5)(7)Amounts include increases during 20152023 in the actuarial present values of benefits under the LyondellBasell Retirement Plan. The increases are calculated based on the difference between the total benefit actuarially reduced from age 65 to current age and the present value of the benefits under the plan. Mr. Guilfoyle’s 2022 pension value was negative due to a significant increase in discount rate during 2022. See the “Pension Benefits” table on page 72 for more information.

(6)(8)

Amounts included in “All Other Compensation” for 20152023 in the table above include the following (amounts in dollars):

 Name        Matching 401(k)
Contributions(a)
($)
        Matching Deferral
Plan
Contributions(b)
($)
        Relocation(c)
($)
        Personal Use
of Aircraft(d)
($)
        Other(e)
($)
        Total
($)
 Peter Vanacker 19,800 121,825 208,069 108,502 45,170 503,366
 Michael McMurray 19,800 56,485   25,739 102,024
 Ken Lane 19,800 59,400  8,605 515,305 603,110
 Jim Guilfoyle 19,800 50,992 110,587  643,264 824,643
 Torkel Rhenman 19,800 51,510   20,126 91,436

(a)Includes Company matching contributions to each NEO’s 401(k).
(b)Includes Company contributions under the 401(k) plan; payouts of vacation accrualsCompany’s U.S. Senior Management Deferral Plan. See the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in 2023” table on page Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in 2023 for departed employees; severance payments; matching contributionsmore information.
(c)Represents relocation benefits provided to Mr. Vanacker and Mr. Guilfoyle.
(d)Represents the approximate incremental cost to the Company’s Deferral Plan;Company for the personal use of Company aircraft by the NEO’s spouse or personal guest in 2023 or the payment or reimbursement of commercial spouse travel related to business trips, as well as reimbursement of additional income tax incurred by the NEO when the cost of such travel is imputed as income. Approximate incremental cost for travel on Company aircraft has been determined based on the total trip charge for each flight segment divided by the total number of passengers traveling on that segment.
(e)For Mr. Guilfoyle, includes $632,000 in expatriation allowances and tax gross ups. For Mr. Lane, includes $500,000 in charitable contributions that were made by the Company on behalf of Mr. Lane. For the other NEOs, includes executive physicals; payment of professional fees for tax filings; financial planning allowances; expatriate and relocation payments; and reimbursementmatching charitable contributions. None of

these amounts individually exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of other compensation for the NEO in 2023.

 taxes and gross-ups in certain situations
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell66

Back to avoid double taxation of executives. The amounts include the following that are required to be separately disclosed under SEC rules:Contents

Mr. Patel: Company matching 401(k) contribution of $15,949; Company 401(k) and pension plan contributions under the restoration feature of our Deferral Plan of $110,457; $15,000 for use in financial planning; expatriate payments and benefits pursuant to the Company’s Expatriate Assignment Policy and Mr. Patel’s employment agreement that provided for continued expatriate benefits for Mr. Patel’s family until July 2015 including $36,714 for housing costs; $24,990 for a mobility premium; a cost-of-living allowance of $29,553; a home-leave allowance of $12,902; $87,222 in tax equalization and gross-up payments as part of the expatriate package; $41,890 in legal fees paid on Mr. Patel’s behalf pursuant to his Employment Agreement; and $92,445 in relocation and temporary housing expenses as part of Mr. Patel’s repatriation to the U.S.

Mr. Brown: Company matching 401(k) contribution of $15,900 and Company 401(k) and pension plan contributions under the restoration feature of our Deferral Plan of $31,038.

Mr. Kaplan: Company matching 401(k) contribution of $16,058 and Company 401(k) and pension plan contributions under the restoration feature of our Deferral Plan of $21,058.

Mr. Roberts: Company matching 401(k) contribution of $14,295; and Company paid professional fees of $11,338 in connection with his UK taxation.

Mr. Gallogly: Company matching 401(k) contributions of $4,188; payment of accrued vacation leave of $158,654; $15,000 for use in financial and tax planning services; reimbursements and gross-up payments of $289,570 and $209,258, respectively, for taxes owed to New York State for LyondellBasell work performed in that state in 2014. Mr. Gallogly is resident in the State of Texas, which has no state income tax. Therefore, income tax liability in New York is not able to be offset against home state taxes.

Ms. Ovelmen: Matching 401(k) contribution of $15,859; Company paid professional fees of $17,306 in connection with her UK taxation; severance payments pursuant to the Company’s Executive Severance Program of $772,353; $15,000 for use in financial planning; and a payment of $11,882 for accrued vacation leave.

Mr. Glidden: Matching 401(k) contributions of $10,608; $15,000 for use in financial and tax planning services; Company paid professional fees of $16,970 in connection with his UK taxation; and $68,878 for accrued vacation leave.

Mr. Allen: Matching 401(k) contributions of $15,974.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

Name

  Grant
Date (1)
   Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity  Incentive
Plan Awards (2)(3)
   Estimated  Future
Payouts

Under Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards (4)
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(5) (#)
   All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(6)(#)
   Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($)
 
      Target  
($)
     Maximum  
($)
     Target  
(#)
     Maximum  
(#)
       

B. Patel

                
   1/12/2015     —       —       —       —       94,551     227,058    $76.15  
   2/17/2015     1,827,226     5,481,677     38,220     76,440     19,110     70,211    $89.94  

K. Brown

                
   1/21/2015     —       —       —       —       14,746     35,461    $81.38  
   2/17/2015     437,729     1,313,186     6,116     12,232     3,058     11,234    $89.94  

J. Kaplan

                
   2/17/2015     330,816     992,448     3,378     6,756     1,689     6,205    $89.94  
   5/07/2015     —       —       1,522     3,044     761     2,857    $101.79  

T. Roberts

                
   1/21/2015     —       —       —       —       44,237     106,383    $81.38  
   2/17/2015     589,246     1,767,739     8,562     17,124     4,281     15,728    $89.94  

J. Gallogly

                
   2/17/2015     81,730     244,109     —       —       —       —       —    

K. Ovelmen

                
   2/17/2015     245,074     735,221     —       —       —       —       —    

C. Glidden

                
   1/21/2015     —       —       —       —       36,865     88,653    $81.38  
   2/17/2015     85,772     257,315     —       —       —       —       —    

B. Allen

                
   2/17/2015     158,695     476,084     1,739     3,478     870     3,194    $89.94  
    Estimated Possible
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
 Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
 Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Name        Grant
Date(1)
        Target
($)
        Max.
($)
        Target
(#)
        Max.
(#)
        Stock or
Units(4)
        Underlying
Options(5)
        Awards(5)
($)
        Awards
($)
Peter Vanacker     2/23/2023 2,320,000 4,640,000      
 2/23/2023   56,422 112,844    6,307,980
 2/23/2023     28,211   2,670,171
 2/23/2023      107,129 94.65  2,664,298
Michael McMurray 2/23/2023 807,500 1,615,000      
 2/23/2023   17,440 34,880    1,949,792
 2/23/2023     8,720   825,348
 2/23/2023      33,113 94.65  823,520
Ken Lane(6) 2/23/2023 826,500 1,653,000      
 2/23/2023   13,834 27,668    1,546,641
 2/23/2023     6,917   654,694
 2/23/2023      26,267 94.65  653,260
Jim Guilfoyle 2/23/2023 753,445 1,506,890      
 2/23/2023   12,205 24,410    1,364,502
 2/23/2023     6,103   577,649
 2/23/2023      23,172 94.65  576,288
Torkel Rhenman 2/23/2023 760,000 1,520,000      
 2/23/2023   12,721 25,442    1,422,190
 2/23/2023     6,361   602,069
 2/23/2023      24,153 94.65 600,685

 

(1)The grant date of February 17, 2015 represents23, 2023 is the date of the first regularly scheduled Compensationregularly-scheduled Board meeting that follows the first regularly-scheduled C&TD Committee meeting of the calendar year when annual grants are made. Mr. Patel received grants on January 12, 2015, his first day as Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to the terms of his Employment Agreement. Messrs. Brown, Roberts and Glidden received one-time grants on January 21, 2015, the effective date of awards granted by the Compensation Committee held at a special meeting in January 2015. Mr. Kaplan also received additional awards in connection with his promotion, effective as of the date of the Compensation Committee’s May 2015 meeting.
(2)The awards shown are the estimated possible payouts of the named executives’NEOs’ annual bonus payments for performance in 2015.2023. Actual bonus (STI) payments for 20152023 are shown in the Summary Compensation Table under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” The named executives’NEOs’ target bonuses are a  percentage of base salary. The maximum shown in the table is the maximum amount that can be earned under the terms of the STI program,plan, which is 300%200% of  target. Under the STI program, eachEach performance measure is assessed and weighted, whichand payments can result in a payment ofrange from 0 200% of target with respect to any particular performance measure. This amount can then be multiplied by an individual performance modifier that ranges from 0 to 1.5 based on individual performance.target.
(3)Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden all left the Company in 2015 and received pro-rated bonus payments for their services in 2015.

(4)Represents PSUs. These awards represent PSUs granted in 2015,2023, which are earned over a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2017,2025, with payouts, if any, in the first quarter of 2018. Each2026. The performance criteriacriterion for the PSUs is assessed, and weighted, whichpayments can result in a payment ofrange from 0 to 200% of the target award, which is settled in shares. These awards do not receiveaccrue dividend equivalent payments.equivalents during the performance period in the form of additional units.
(5)(4)Represents RSUs.These awards represent RSUs receive dividend equivalents. The regular RSU grants madeawarded on February 17 and May 7, 201523, 2023, which will cliff vest at the end of three years from the date of grant. The one-timegrant date. RSU grants made on January 12 and January 21, 2015 vest over a five year period as follows: 10% on the first anniversary; 15% on the second anniversary; and 25% on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries.holders are entitled to receive cash dividend equivalents.
(6)(5)RepresentsThese awards represent annual stock option grants for all named executives, other than Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden, who did not receive annual grants. Also represents one-time grants made to Messrs. Patel, Brown, Roberts and Glidden. The exercise price of allthe options is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The annual option grantsAll stock options included in the table vest in equal increments over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. The one-time grants made
(6)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024, and his unvested PSUs, RSUs, and stock options on January 12 and January 21, 2015 vest over a five year period as follows: 10%such date were forfeited on the first anniversary; 15% on the second anniversary; and 25% on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries.terms described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell67
Back to Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20152023

  Option Awards  Stock Awards  Equity Incentive Plan Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)(1)
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(2)
  Market Value Of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
($)(3)
  Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)(4)
  Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
($)(3)
 

B. Patel

        
  806    1,612    85.80    2/20/2024    114,536    9,953,178    41,717    3,625,207  
  —      227,058    76.15    1/12/2025    —      —      —      —    
  —      70,211    89.94    2/17/2025    —      —      —      —    

K. Brown

        
  —      35,461    81.38    1/21/2025    17,804    1,547,168    8,998    781,926  
  —      11,234    89.94    2/17/2025    —       —      —    

J. Kaplan

        
  813    —      13.11    4/30/2020    2,450    212,905    5,731    498,024  
  —      6,205    89.94    2/17/2025    —      —      —      —    
  —      2,857    101.79    5/07/2025    —      —      —      —    

T. Roberts

        
  —      5,485    60.51    2/12/2023    62,664    5,445,502    14,681    1,275,779  
  —      5,642    85.80    2/20/2024    —      —      —      —    
  —      106,383    81.31    1/21/2025    —      —      —      —    
  —      15,728    89.94    2/17/2025    —      —      —      —    

J. Gallogly

        
  37,576    —      96.57    1/12/2020    —      —      7,347    638,454  

K. Ovelmen

        
  —      —      —      —      —      —      5,032    —    

C. Glidden

        
  5,482    —      81.38    2/28/2020    —      —      1,595    138,606  

B. Allen

        
  4,187    2,093    60.51    2/12/2023    5,343    464,307    3,488    303,107  
  806    1,612    85.80    2/20/2024    —      —      —      —    
  —      3,194    89.94    2/17/2025    —      —      —      —    

  Option Awards Stock Awards
              Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
Name     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
     Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable(1)
     Option
Exercise
Price
($)
     Option
Expiration
Date
     Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)
     Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested(3)
($)
     Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units,
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(4)
     Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units,
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(3)
($)
Peter Vanacker 32,065  64,126 101.51 5/23/2032 61,983 5,893,344 102,685 9,763,290
  107,129 94.65 2/23/2033    
Michael McMurray 103,306  92.17 11/5/2029 22,936 2,180,755 31,911 3,034,098
 16,940  78.15 2/20/2030    
 24,308 12,153 99.21 2/25/2031    
 9,538 19,074 89.26 2/24/2032    
  33,113 94.65 2/23/2033    
Ken Lane 20,472 10,235 99.21 2/25/2031 33,827 3,216,271 28,233 2,684,394
  18,978 89.26 2/24/2032    
  26,267 94.65 2/23/2033    
Jim Guilfoyle 1,205  84.74 2/17/2025 17,261 1,641,176 24,144 2,295,612
 347  96.23 6/1/2025    
 9,148  87.49 2/16/2027    
 11,651  103.89 2/21/2028    
 18,867  83.30 2/21/2029    
 29,816  78.15 2/20/2030    
 18,068 9,034 99.21 2/25/2031    
 7,869 15,736 89.26 2/24/2032    
  23,172 94.65 2/23/2033    
Torkel Rhenman 10,666  80.68 7/15/2029 18,209 1,731,312 24,660 2,344,673
 38,402  78.15 2/20/2030    
 20,472 10,235 99.21 2/25/2031    
 7,869 15,736 89.26 2/24/2032    
  24,153 94.65 2/23/2033    

 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell68
Back to Contents
(1)The vesting schedules of the unexercisable stock options are shown below:

 

Name        Total Unvested
Stock Options
        Exercise Price(a)
($)
        2024 Vesting Details        2025 Vesting Details        2026 Vesting Details
Peter Vanacker 64,126 101.51 32,063 vesting on
May 23, 2024
 32,063 vesting on
May 23, 2025
  
 107,129 94.65 35,711 vesting on
February 23, 2024
 35,709 vesting on
February 23, 2025
 35,709 vesting on
February 23, 2026
Michael McMurray 12,153 99.21 12,153 vesting on
February 25,2024
    
 19,074 89.26 9,537 vesting on
February 24, 2024
 9,537 vesting on
February 24, 2025
  
 33,113 94.65 11,039 vesting on
February 23, 2024
 11,037 vesting on
February 23, 2025
 11,037 vesting on
February 23, 2026
Ken Lane(b) 10,235 99.21 10,235 vesting on
February 25, 2024
    
 18,978 89.26 9,489 vesting on
February 24, 2024
 9,489 vesting on
February 24, 2025
  
 26,267 94.65 8,757 vesting on
February 23, 2024
 8,755 vesting on
February 23, 2025
 8,755 vesting on
February 23, 2026
Jim Guilfoyle 9,034 99.21 9,034 vesting on
February 25, 2024
    
 15,736 89.26 7,868 vesting on
February 24, 2024
 7,868 vesting on
February 24, 2025
  
 23,172 94.65 7,724 vesting on
February 23, 2024
 7,724 vesting on
February 23, 2025
 7,724 vesting on
February 23, 2026
Torkel Rhenman 10,235 99.21 10,235 vesting on
February 25, 2024
    
 15,736 89.26 7,868 vesting on
February 24, 2024
 7,868 vesting on
February 24, 2025
  
 24,153 94.65 8,051 vesting on
February 23, 2024
 8,051 vesting on
February 23, 2025
 8,051 vesting on
February 23, 2026

Name

 

Vesting Dates of Unexercisable Stock Options

B. Patel

(a)

Of the 1,612 options with anThe exercise price of $85.50, 806all options is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The fair market value of all outstanding vested on February 20, 2016 and the remaining 806 vest February 20, 2017.

Of the 227,058 options with an exercise price of $76.15, 22,706 vested January 12, 2016; 34,059 vest January 12, 2017; 56,765 vest January 12, 2018; and 56,764 vest on each of January 12, 2019 and 2020.

Of the 70,211 options with an exercise price of $89.94, 23,405 vested February 17, 2016 and 23,403 vest on each of February 17, 2017 and 2018.

K. Brown

Of the 35, 461 options with an exercise price of $81.38, 3,547 vested on January 21, 2016; 5,319 vest on January 21, 2017; and 8,865 vest on each of January 21, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Of the 11,234 options with an exercise price of $89.94, 3,745 vested on February 17, 2016, 3,745 vest on February 17, 2017 and 3,744 vest on February 17, 2018.

J. Kaplan

Of the 6,205 options with an exercise price of $89.94, 2,069 vested February 17, 2016 and 2,068 vest on each of February 17, 2017 and 2018.

Of the 2,857 options with an exercise price of $101.79, 953 vest on May 7, 2016 and 952 vest on each of May 7, 2017 and 2018.

T. Roberts

10,639 vested on January 21, 2016; 5,485 vested on February 12, 2016; 5,244 vested on February 17, 2016; and 2,821 vested on February 20, 2016

The remaining unexercisableunvested stock options as of December 31, 2015 shownJune 13, 2022 was adjusted as a result of the special dividend paid in 2022. All stock options included in the table vest in three increments over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant.

(b)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024, and his unvested stock options on such date were forfeited pursuant toon the terms described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” Mr. Lane’s previously vested options may be exercised for 90 days after termination of the option award agreements when Mr. Roberts left the Company in 2016.

B. Allen

The 2,093 options with an exercise price of $60.51 vested on February 12, 2016.

Of the 1,612 options with an exercise price of $85.50, 806 vested on February 20, 2016 and 806 vest on February 20, 2017.

Of the 3,194 options with an exercise price of $89.94, 1,066 vested on February 17, 2016 and 1,064 will vest on each of February 17, 2017 and 2018.

employment. 

 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell69
Back to Contents
(2)Includes restricted stock unitsRSUs for each of the named executives. Mr. Patel vested in 9,456 RSUs on January 12, 2016 and Mr. Brown vested in 1,475 on January 21, 2016. Mr. Roberts vested in 4,424 RSUs on January 21, 2016 and, pursuant toNEOs, the terms of the award agreements, vested in additional 26,640 when he left the Company in February 2016. Mr. Robert’s remaining 31,580 RSUs were forfeited pursuant to the terms of the award agreements. The other named executives’ remaining RSUs vest as follows:vesting schedules for which are shown below:

 

Name

 

Vesting Date ofTotal Unvested RSUs

B. Patel

 14,183 vest on January 12, 2017; 875 vest on February 20, 2017; 23,638 vest on January 12, 2018; 19,110 vest on February 17, 2018; 23, 637 vest on January 12, 2019 and 23,637 vest on January 12, 2020.Vesting Schedule

K. Brown

Peter Vanacker 
 2,212 vest on January 21, 2017; 3,687 vest on January 21, 2018; 3,058 vest on February 17, 2018; 3,686 vest on January 21, 2019; and 3,686 vest on January 21, 2019.

J. Kaplan

61,983
 1,689 vest10,640 vesting on February 17, 2018 and 761 vest on May 7, 2018.5/23/2024

B. Allen

 875 vest23,132 vesting on February 20, 2017; 2,450 vest5/23/2025
28,211 vesting on January 28, 2018; 1,148 vest2/23/2026
Michael McMurray 22,9366,980 vesting on February 12, 2018;2/25/2024
7,236 vesting on 2/24/2025
8,720 vesting on 2/23/2026
Ken Lane(a)33,8275,878 vesting on 2/25/2024
13,832 vesting on 5/26/2024
7,200 vesting on 2/24/2025
6,917 vesting on 2/23/2026
Jim Guilfoyle17,2615,188 vesting on 2/25/2024
5,970 vesting on 2/24/2025
6,103 vesting on 2/23/2026
Torkel Rhenman18,2095,878 vesting on 2/25/2024
5,970 vesting on 2/24/2025
6,361 vesting on 2/23/2026

(a)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024, and 870 vesthis unvested RSUs on February 17, 2018.such date were forfeited on the terms described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

 

(3)Dollar values are based on the closing price of $86.90$95.08 of the Company’s shares on the NYSE on December 31, 2015.29, 2023.

(4)Includes PSUs granted in 20142022 and 20152023 with three-year performance periods ending December 31, 20162024 and December 31, 2017,2025, respectively. We have included the targetedtarget number of PSUs, although payouts on PSUs are made after the Company’s financial results for the entire performance period are reported and the CompensationC&TD Committee determines achievement of performance resultsgoals and corresponding payouts,vesting, typically in mid to late February of the nextfollowing year. The PSUs for the 2021-2023 performance period ended on December 31, 2015 are not included in the table as they are considered earned as of December 31, 20152023 for proxy disclosure purposes; those PSUs paid out at 200% and are included in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested” table below. The PSUs in the table above include the following:those shown below.

 

Name

  PSUs with Three-Year Performance Period  Ending December 31,   
  

2016

   

2017

 

B. Patel

   3,497     38,220  

K. Brown

   2,882     6,116  

J. Kaplan

   831     4,900  

T. Roberts*

   6,119     8,562  

J. Gallogly*

   7,347     —    

K. Ovelmen*

   5,032     —    

C. Glidden*

   1,595     —    

B. Allen

   1,749     1,739  
 PSUs with Three-Year Performance
Period Ending December 31,
Name 2024 2025
Peter Vanacker 46,263 56,422
Michael McMurray 14,471 17,440
Ken Lane(a) 14,399 13,834
Jim Guilfoyle 11,939 12,205
Torkel Rhenman 11,939 12,721

 

*The(a)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024, and his outstanding PSUs for Mr. Roberts arewere forfeited on the PSUs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2015. In February 2016, Mr. Roberts forfeited 1,699 of the PSUs with a performance period ending on December 31, 2016 and 5,232 of the awards with a performance period ending December 31, 2017 when he left the Company. The PSUs shown for Mr. Gallogly, Ms. Ovelmen and Mr. Glidden reflect the number of PSUs that they did not forfeit, and therefore remained outstanding as of December 31, 2015 after their departures from the Company.terms described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell70
Back to Contents

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

   Option Awards   Stock Awards (2) 

Name

  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise (#)
   Value
Realized on
Exercise ($)(1)
   Number of
Shares Acquired on
Vesting (#)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

B. Patel

   —       —       104,453     10,681,365  

K. Brown

   —       —       142,322     14,537,052  

J. Kaplan

   —       —       15,402     1,594,415  

T. Roberts

   21,533     834,603     5,721     448,742  

J. Gallogly

   3,511,216     256,392,008     40,826     3,337,676  

K. Ovelmen

   141,066     6,100,180     29,934     2,766,082  

C. Glidden

   39,009     2,917,222     208,546     16,978,292  

B. Allen

   —       —       2,239     174,485  
   Option Awards  Stock Awards(2)
Name  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
 Value
Realized on
Exercise(1)
($)
  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
 Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
Peter Vanacker     10,641 965,458
Michael McMurray     41,019 3,993,984
Ken Lane  27,422 423,459  34,054 3,315,832
Jim Guilfoyle  5,667 133,855  29,327 2,855,601
Torkel Rhenman     34,516 3,360,794

 

(1)The value realized on option awardsexercise represents the difference between the option exercise price and the market price of LyondellBasellthe LYB shares when exercised.
(2)Includes RSUs that vested in 20152023 and PSUs granted in 20132021 with a performance period ended December 31, 2015, other than for Mr. Kaplan, whose amounts include only RSUs.2023. The determination ofC&TD Committee reviewed the achievement of performance results and corresponding vesting ofgoals for the PSUs was performed by the Compensation Committeegranted in 2021, with a performance period ended December 31, 2023 in February 2016.2024 and determined that 200% payout was earned. The number of shares acquired on vesting for both RSUs and PSUs is the gross number of shares for all named executives,NEOs, although we withhold shares in payment of minimum statutory withholding taxes when the awards vest. The value realized for RSUs is the number of gross shares vested timesmultiplied by the market price on the date the restrictions lapsed and thelapsed. The value realized for PSUs is the number of gross shares timesvested multiplied by the market price on the date the CompensationC&TD Committee determined the earned percentage of shares for the PSUs. The table below shows the gross number of shares that vested under both RSUs and PSUs for each of the named executivesNEOs in 2015.2023.

Name

  RSUs Vested   PSUs Earned for
Performance Period
Ending December  31,
2015
 

B. Patel

   99,310     5,143  

K. Brown

   134,658     7,664  

J. Kaplan

   15,402     —    

T. Roberts

   364     5,357  

J. Gallogly

   7,254     33,572  

K. Ovelmen

   18,702     11,232  

C. Glidden

   200,636     7,910  

B. Allen

   —       2,239  

Pension Benefits

Name

  Plan Name   Number
of Years
Credited
Service (#)
   Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)(1)
   Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year ($)(1)
 

B. Patel

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     6     69,587     —    

K. Brown

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     6     81,850     —    

J. Kaplan

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     6     71,159     —    

T. Roberts

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     4     57,265     —    

J. Gallogly

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     5     0     79,213  

K. Ovelmen

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     4     46,141     —    

C. Glidden

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     5     76,073     —    

B. Allen

   LyondellBasell Retirement Plan     3     35,095     —    
 Name RSUs Vested in 2023 PSUs Earned for
Performance Period
Ending December 31, 2023
 Peter Vanacker 10,641 
 Michael McMurray 7,439 33,580
 Ken Lane 5,774 28,280
 Jim Guilfoyle 4,365 24,962
 Torkel Rhenman 6,236 28,280

 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell71
Back to Contents

Pension Benefits 

Name Plan Name Number of Years
Credited Service(1)
 Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit(1)
($)
 Payments During Last
Fiscal Year
($)
Peter Vanacker LyondellBasell Pension Plan 2 30,026 
Michael McMurray LyondellBasell Pension Plan 4 64,765 
Ken Lane LyondellBasell Pension Plan 4 71,241 
Jim Guilfoyle Cash Balance 15 300,416  
 Equistar Non-Represented 11 145,333 
 Millennium Petrochemicals 5 61,676 
 Total 31 507,425 
Torkel Rhenman LyondellBasell Pension Plan 4 75,535 

(1)The amounts shown in the table are the actuarial present value of each participant’s accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2015,2023, calculated on the same basis as used in Note 1615 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in ourthe 2023 Annual Report, on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, with the exception that each participant was assumed to  continue to be actively employed by us until age 65 (earliest unreduced retirement age) and immediately commence his benefit at that time. Mr. Gallogly retired in 2015 and received a lump-sum payment of his accumulated benefit.

The LyondellBasell Retirement Plan is a U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan that provides pension benefits under a cash balance formula that defines participants’ accrued benefits in terms of a notional cash account balance. Eligible employees become participants immediately upon employment and are fully vested upon the earliest of (i) three years of service, (ii) death, or (iii) reaching age 65. The notional account balance for each participant comprises a pay credit of 5% and interest credits, each of which are accumulated at the end of each quarter. Pay credits are based on quarterly base pay, as limited by the Internal Revenue Code, and interest credits are based on the 5th, 4th5th, 4th, and 3rd3rd monthly-determined 30 year30-year treasury rates before the start of that quarter. Benefits under the plan are payable upon separation from the Company.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell72
Back to Contents

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in 2015

2023 

 

Name

  Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(1)
   Registrant
Contributions in Last
Fiscal Year
($)(1)(2)
   Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year
($)(3)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(4)
   Aggregate
Balance at
End of Last
Fiscal Year
($)(2)
 

B. Patel

   —       110,457     (1,129  —       183,339  

K. Brown

   —       31,038     (655  —       84,742  

J. Kaplan

   —       21,058     (113  —       27,708  

T. Roberts

   —       0     (1,102  —       25,633  

J. Gallogly

   —       0     (320  —       142,816  

K. Ovelmen

   —       0     (1,642  —       110,242  

C. Glidden

   —       0     (1,166  —       86,374  

B. Allen

   52,558     5,763     (2,328  —       96,201  
Name Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year(1)
($)
 Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year(1)(2)
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings in Last
Fiscal Year(3)
($)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(4)
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End(5)
($)
Peter Vanacker  121,825 5,409  188,453
Michael McMurray  56,485 91,411  515,775
Ken Lane  59,400 25,216  261,294
Jim Guilfoyle  50,992 32,908  295,720
Torkel Rhenman  51,510 32,759  243,327

 

(1)The Company maintains a U.S. Senior Management Deferral Plan that allows executives to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual bonus and equity grants (“eligible pay”) for payment at a future date. Funds deferred under this plan are allocated into notional accounts that mirror selected investment funds in our 401(k) and defined benefit pension plans, althoughthough the deferred funds deferred are not actually invested inand the funds.Company may use separate assets to fund the benefit.
(2)Company contributions to the executives’ Deferral Plan accounts are included in “All Other Compensation,” but not “Salary,” in the Summary Compensation Table. The Deferral Plan provides for Company contributions for that portion of pay that cannot be matchedtaken into account for matching contributions or contributed inaccruals under the Company’s 401(k) plan and defined benefit pension plan due to IRS limits. The eligibility for Company contributions begins in the Deferral Plan once the employee’s salary has reached the IRS limits for those plans andplans; actual contributions by the Company are made as of  February 15 of the next calendar year. The Company’s contribution of these amounts occurs regardless of whether the employee has contributed any amounts under the  Deferral Plan.Plan or 401(k) plan. Eligible employees must be employed as of the February 15 date in order to receive the Company contribution. The Company contributions shown were made in respect of the named executives’ 2015 earnings, although amounts were not credited to the accounts until February 2016.
(3)Earnings on these accounts are not included in any other amounts in the tables included in this proxy statement, as the amounts of the named executives’NEOs’ earnings   represent the general market gains (or losses) on investments rather thanand are not amounts or rates set by the Company for the benefit of the named executives.NEOs.
(4)Accounts are distributed as either a lump sum payment or in annual installments upon the later of (i) whenthe date on which the employee has reachedreaches (x) at least 55 years of age and has 10ten years of service or (y) 65 years of age and (ii) termination of employment. Special circumstances may allow for a modified distribution in the event of the employee’s death, an unforeseen emergency, or upon a change-in-control of the Company. In the event of death, distribution will be made to the designated beneficiary in the form previously elected by the executive. In the event of an unforeseen emergency, the plan administrator may allow an early payment in the amount required to satisfy the emergency. All participants are immediately 100% vested in all of their contributions, Company contributions, and gains and/or losses related to their notional investment choices.
(5)The balance as of the last year includes the Company contributions made in respect of the NEOs’ 2023 earnings, although amounts were not credited to the accounts for continuing NEOs until February 2024. The balance also includes contributions made by the employee as explained in footnote 1 above.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell73
Back to Contents

Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control

We entered into employment agreements with Mr. Patel, Mr. Brown, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Gallogly and Mr. Glidden. Our other named executive officers do not have employment agreements butNEOs participate in our Executive Severance Program. These employment agreements, and the Executive Severance Program, provide our executives withwhich provides for severance payments in the eventcertain events of their termination of employment, that are not provided to all of our salaried employees. Each of the named executives other than Mr. Gallogly would be required to executeexecutive executes a release in favor of the Company. Under the terms of the Company’s Executive Severance Plan, in the event of a termination by an NEO for Good Reason or by the Company without cause, such NEO will receive a lump sum payment equal to (1) the sum of the NEO’s base salary and target annual bonus amount for the preceding year (except the CEO, who will receive two times such sum), plus (2) an amount equal to the cost of 18 months of continuation coverage premiums for medical coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended, at the subsidized rates that active employees pay to effectuate similar coverage in order to receive any paymentseffect on the termination date. In addition, under their agreements or the Executive Severance Program, as applicable.

Plan, an NEO who is terminated within two years of a change in control will receive a one-time payment equal to two times the sum of his base salary plus target annual bonus (except the CEO, who will receive three times such sum). In additioneach case, such NEO will also continue to the amounts provided forreceive subsidized coverage at active employee rates under the Company’s life insurance plan for 18 months following the date of termination, if permissible, and will receive outplacement assistance with a provider designated by the Company. 

Under the terms of the Company’s STI program, all NEOs will receive pro rata annual bonus payments in the event of termination of employment due to death or disability or termination without Cause, payable following certification of payout under the STI program the following year. Additionally, under the terms of our LTIP and equity award agreements, and the Executive Severance Program, our named executives mayNEOs will receive certain acceleration of vestingaccelerated or pro-rated vesting of their equity awards in differentupon termination of employment scenarios. The treatment of their equity awards is governed by the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan and the specific equity award agreements. The treatment of the named executives’ awards is the same as for all other salaried employees that receive equity awards. The terms of our Long Term Incentive Plan and the equity award agreements provide for certain vesting of awards in the event of a change in control of the Company, but only if the individual’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by the individual for good reason within one year of the change in control. The Company believes that this “double trigger” is appropriate because it ensures our executives do not have conflicts in the event of a change in control situation and it also avoids windfalls for any employees participating in ourwhose employment with the Company or its successors continues following such an event. The treatment of the equity programs, including executives.awards for the NEOs is the same as for all other employees who receive equity awards. 

We describe below

A summary of the treatment of equity awards granted through December 31, 2023 in different scenarios.scenarios under the terms of our LTIP and the award agreements is provided below. “Cause” and “Good Reason” are defined in the Company’s Executive Severance Plan as follows:

Termination

“Cause” means (i) the executive’s continued failure (except where due to physical or mental incapacity) to substantially perform his or her duties; (ii) the executive’s intentional misconduct or gross neglect in the performance of Employment for Causehis or her duties; (iii) the executive’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony; (iv) the commission by the executive of an act of fraud or embezzlement against the Company or without Good Reason byany affiliate; (v) the Executive

All awards, including stock options, RSUsexecutive’s breach of fiduciary duty, (vi) an executive’s violation of the Company’s Code of Conduct or (vii) the executive’s willful breach of any material provision of any employment or other written agreement between the executive and PSUs are forfeited.

Termination of Employment without Cause by the Company or with Good Reasonan affiliate (as determined in good faith by the Executive

Stock options, RSUs and PSUs vest pro-rata.

For stock options, the pro-rationC&TD Committee) which is based on the number of months worked from the date of grant until termination divided by the number of months worked from the date of grant until the vesting. The number of months between date of grant and vesting is based on each tranche of vesting for the options. The options may be exercised for 90not remedied within 15 days after termination of employment. The pro-ration of RSUs and PSUswritten notice is determined based on the number of months worked divided by the number of months in the vesting or performance period, respectively. The number of units earned under the PSUs used for the pro-rated calculations is based on the regular determinations of the Compensation Committee based on Company performance in the first quarter after the end of the performance year.

Termination of Employment without Cause byreceived from the Company or with Good Reasonaffiliate specifying the breach. Any determination of whether Cause exists shall be made by the Executive within 12 Months of a ChangeC&TD Committee in Controlits sole discretion.

 

All stock options and RSUs are immediately vested upon termination“Good Reason” means the occurrence, without the Participant’s express written consent, of employment. The stock options remain exercisable for 90 days.

PSUs vest pro-rata based on the number of months worked(i) a material diminution in the performance period divided by the number of months in the performance period. The number of units earned under the PSUs used for the pro-rated calculations is based on the regular determinationsexecutive’s duties, responsibilities or authority; (ii) any material diminution of the Compensation Committee based on Company performance inexecutive’s Base Salary; or (iii) the first quarter after the endinvoluntary relocation of the performance year.

Retirement

Stock options, RSUs and PSUs vest pro-rata, based onexecutive’s principal place of employment by more than 50 miles from the same calculations as in the caseexecutive’s principal place of employment immediately prior to such relocation. Any assertion by an executive of a termination without cause.

Stock options remain exercisableof employment for five years.

Death or Disability“Good Reason” will not be effective unless certain conditions regarding notice and cure are satisfied.

 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell74
Back to Contents
Termination of Employment for Cause by the Company or without Good Reason by the Executive
All unvested awards are forfeited. In the event of termination for Cause by the Company, unexercised stock options are also forfeited. In the event of resignation without Good Reason by the executive, previously vested options may be exercised for 90 days after termination of employment.
Termination of Employment without Cause by the Company
Stock options, RSUs, and PSUs vest pro rata.
Stock options: Stock options provide for vesting in equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date. In the event of termination without Cause, pro-ration is determined for each unvested installment separately based on the number of months worked from the date of grant until termination divided by the number of months from the date of grant until the original vesting date for that installment. The options may be exercised for 90 days after termination of employment.
RSUs and PSUs: Pro-ration is determined based on the number of months worked from the date of grant (for RSUs) or beginning of the relevant performance period (for PSUs) until termination divided by the number of months in the vesting or performance period, respectively. The number of units earned under the PSUs is based on performance over the applicable three-year performance period as determined by the C&TD Committee in the first quarter after the end of the performance period and can range from 0 to 200% of target.
Termination of Employment with Good Reason by the Executive
All unvested awards are forfeited and previously vested options may be exercised for 90 days after termination of employment.
Termination of Employment without Cause by the Company or with Good Reason by the Executive within 12 Months of a Change in Control
Stock options and RSUs: All stock options and RSUs are immediately vested. Stock options remain exercisable for 90 days.
PSUs: PSUs vest pro rata based on the number of months worked from the beginning of the performance period until termination divided by the number of months in the performance period. The number of units earned under the PSUs is based on the C&TD Committee’s determination of performance results as of the last quarter prior to the change in control.
Retirement
Under the Company’s award agreements, “Retirement” means an executive’s termination of service (i) on or after age 55 with 10 years of service, (ii) on or after age 55 with 7 years of service for Mr. Vanacker, or (iii) on or after age 65 for Mr. Rhenman. For all NEOs, “Enhanced Retirement” means an executive’s termination of service on or after age 60 with at least 10 years of service. None of our NEOs currently meet the requirements for Retirement or Enhanced Retirement.
In the event of Retirement, all awards vest pro rata, based on the same calculations as in the case of a termination without Cause. Stock options remain exercisable for five years or their original term, whichever is shorter. In the event of Enhanced Retirement, all awards vest in full on their original vesting schedule. The Company’s award agreements provide that an executive who meets the requirements for Enhanced Retirement will be subject to non-competition, non-solicitation, and other restrictive covenants for two years following his or her retirement and, beginning with 2022 awards, executives who meet the requirements for Retirement will also be subject to one-year restrictive covenants. Stock options remain exercisable for their original term.
Death or Disability
Stock Options and RSUs: Stock options and RSUs vest immediately. The stock options remain exercisable for one year.
PSUs: PSUs vest pro rata, based on the same calculations as for PSUs in the case of a termination without Cause. 

Stock options and RSUs vest immediately. The stock options remain exercisable for one year. PSUs vest pro-rata, based on

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell75
Back to Contents

In accordance with SEC disclosure requirements, the same calculations as in the case of a termination without cause.

The tables below show, in dollars, the amounts our named executivesNEOs could receive in different circumstances if the termination events described occurred as of December 31, 2015. We2023, with the exception of Mr. Lane, who voluntarily resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024.  Mr. Lane did not include informationreceive any payments or benefits in connection with his departure, and all his unvested equity awards as of March 15, 2024 were forfeited. We excluded any amounts for Mr. Gallogly, Mr. Gliddenbenefits or Ms. Ovelmen because none of them were employed at the end of the year, and the amounts they did receive when they left the Company are included in the Summary Compensation Table and the Options Exercised and Stock Vested tables above. We also did not include any amountspayments that are available to all salaried employees of the Company.

The amounts included in the tables belowshown are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the named executiveNEO would actually receive upon anyin a termination scenario. The values for stock options are calculated based on the number of options that would vest in the different scenarios, multiplied by the difference between $86.90, the fair market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2015, and the exercise price. Those executives that have no values for their stock options in the table either do not vest in any options or the options that do vest in the different scenarios have an exercise price greater that the fair market value as of December 31, 2015.

The values of the RSUs are based on the number of RSUs that would vest in the different scenarios multiplied by the fair market value of our stock on December 31, 2015.

The values of the PSUs are based on the number of units that would vest in the different scenarios multiplied by the fair market value of our stock on December 31, 2015. The terms of our PSU award agreements state that they may be paid out from 0 – 200% depending on the Company’s performance, which is determined by the Compensation Committee. The values below assume that the payout is at target, or 100%. Also, although the valuesevent, but are calculated as of December 31, 2015, the shares would not be paid out until the first quarter after the end of the performance period of the awards.

Amounts under “Other” include continued COBRA or medical coverage and outplacement services.described below.

 

Death or Disability 
   Accelerated Option Awards   Accelerated RSUs   Pro-rated PSUs 

B. Patel

  $2,442,647    $9,953,178    $1,309,699  

K. Brown

   —      $1,547,168    $344,124  

J. Kaplan

   —      $212,905    $190,079  

T. Roberts

  $745,642    $5,445,502    $602,507  

B. Allen

  $57,008    $464,307    $151,698  

Death or Disability

 

Termination Without Cause or by Named Executive for Good Reason 
   Pro-rated Option Awards   Pro-rated RSUs   Pro-rated PSUs   Severance Payment   Other 

B. Patel

  $831,089    $3,300,520    $1,309,699    $3,125,000    $20,950  

K. Brown

  $66,543    $516,826    $344,124    $987,729     —    

J. Kaplan

   —      $59,543    $190,079    $815,816    $50,076  

T. Roberts

  $343,604    $1,724,407    $602,507    $1,289,246     —    

B. Allen

  $53,520    $84,810    $151,698    $477,695    $50,076  
  Accelerated
Option Awards(1)
 Accelerated
RSUs(2)
 Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
 Cash Severance
Payment(4)
 Total(5)
Peter Vanacker 46,065 5,893,344 4,720,817  10,660,226
Michael McMurray 125,250 2,180,755 2,797,349  5,103,354
Jim Guilfoyle 101,548 1,641,176 2,130,268  3,872,992
Torkel Rhenman 101,970 1,731,312 2,277,831  4,111,113
           

Termination by NEO for Good Reason

           
  Pro-rated Option
Awards(1)
 Pro-rated
RSUs(2)
 Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
 Cash Severance
Payment(4)
 Total(5)
Peter Vanacker    7,540,000 7,540,000
Michael McMurray    1,657,500 1,657,500
Jim Guilfoyle    1,546,545 1,546,545
Torkel Rhenman    1,560,000 1,560,000
           

Retirement or Termination without Cause

           
  Pro-rated
Option Awards(1)
 Pro-rated
RSUs(2)
 Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
 Cash Severance
Payment(4)
 Total(5)
Peter Vanacker 25,806 2,884,727 4,720,817 7,540,000 15,171,350
Michael McMurray 96,639 1,338,251 2,797,349 1,657,500 5,889,739
Jim Guilfoyle 78,729 1,019,638 2,130,268 1,546,545 4,775,180
Torkel Rhenman 78,965 1,090,948 2,277,831 1,560,000 5,007,744

 

Termination Without Cause or by Named Executive for Good Reason within 12 Months of a Change in Control 
   Accelerated Option Awards   Accelerated RSUs   Pro-rated PSUs   Severance Payment   Other 

B. Patel

  $2,442,647    $9,953,178    $1,309,699    $3,906,250    $20,950  

K. Brown

   —      $1,547,168    $344,124    $987,729     —    

J. Kaplan

   —      $212,905    $190,079    $815,816    $50,076  

T. Roberts

  $745,642    $5,445,502    $602,507    $1,289,246     —    

B. Allen

  $57,008    $464,307    $151,698    $477,695    $50,076  

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell76

ADOPTION OF DUTCH STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS FOR 2015

(Item 3 on the Proxy Card)

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to adopt our Dutch statutory annual accounts

Back to Contents

Termination without Cause or by NEO for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Accounts”), as required under Dutch law and our Articles of Association.

Our Annual Accounts are prepared in accordance with international financial reporting standards (“IFRS”) and Dutch law. The Annual Accounts contain certain disclosures not required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and there are differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP.

A copy of the Annual Accounts can be accessed through our website, www.lyb.com, and may be obtained free of charge by request to our administrative offices c/o LyondellBasell, 1221 McKinney St., Suite 700, Houston, TX 77010 Attn: Corporate Secretary.

The affirmative voteGood Reason within 12 Months of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to adopt our Annual Accounts.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that you vote FOR the adoption of our Annual Accounts.

Change in Control

 

DISCHARGE FROM LIABILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD

(Item 4 on the Proxy Card)

Under Dutch law, at the Annual Meeting shareholders may discharge the members of the Management Board from liability to the Company in respect of the exercise of their management duties during the financial year concerned. The discharge does not affect any potential liability pursuant to the provisions of the law of The Netherlands relating to liability upon bankruptcy and does not extend to matters that have not been disclosed to shareholders.

It is proposed that the shareholders resolve to discharge the members of the Management Board in office in 2015 from liability in respect of the exercise of their management duties during 2015.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to discharge the members of the Management Board from liability to the Company for 2015.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that you vote FOR the discharge of the members of the Management Board from liability to the Company for 2015.

  Accelerated 
Option Awards(1)
 Accelerated 
RSUs(2)
 Pro-rated
PSUs(3)
 Cash Severance
Payment(4)
 Total(5)
Peter Vanacker 46,065 5,893,344 4,720,817 11,310,000 21,970,226
Michael McMurray 125,250 2,180,755 2,797,349 3,315,000 8,418,354
Jim Guilfoyle 101,548 1,641,176 2,130,268 3,093,090 6,966,082
Torkel Rhenman 101,970 1,731,312 2,277,831 3,120,000 7,231,113

 

DISCHARGE FROM LIABILITY OF MEMBERS OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD

(Item 5 on the Proxy Card)

Under Dutch law, at the Annual Meeting shareholders may discharge the members of the Supervisory Board from liability to the Company in respect of the exercise of their supervisory duties during the financial year concerned. This discharge also does not affect any potential liability under the provisions of the law of The Netherlands relating to liability upon bankruptcy and does not extend to matters not disclosed to shareholders.

It is proposed that the shareholders resolve to discharge the members of the Supervisory Board in office in 2015 from liability in respect of the exercise of their supervisory duties during 2015.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to discharge the members of the Supervisory Board from liability to the Company for 2015.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that you vote FOR the discharge of the members of the Supervisory Board from liability to the Company for 2015.

(1)The values for stock options included are calculated based on the number of options that would vest, multiplied by the difference between $95.08, the market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2023 (determined as the closing price of our common stock on the last preceding trading day), and the exercise price of the stock option. Amounts actually received by the NEO would depend on the fair market value of our shares after his termination when the options are exercised.
(2)The values of the RSUs are based on the number of RSUs that would vest multiplied by the fair market value of our stock on December 31, 2023, which may be different than the fair market value of our stock upon a termination event.
(3)PSUs accumulate dividend equivalents that are converted to additional units at the end of the performance period, subject to the same terms and conditions as the original award. The values of the PSUs are based on the number of units that would vest multiplied by the market value of our stock on December 31, 2023. The values above assume that the payout is at target, or 100%. The actual payout would be determined by the C&TD Committee after the performance period or, in the case of termination without Cause or by the NEO for Good Reason within 12 months of a change in control, as of the end of the last quarter prior to the change in control. Also, although the values are calculated as of December 31, 2023, the shares would not be issued until the first quarter after the end of the original performance period of the awards.
(4)Cash Severance Payment includes target bonus payment under the 2023 STI program.  Cash severance is not payable in the event of Death or Disability and Retirement.
(5)In addition to the above, each of the NEOs would receive a lump sum payment of approximately $35,000 for the cost of eighteen months of continuation coverage premiums for medical coverage for himself and his dependents in any termination event other than death and disability. All NEOs would also receive Company-provided outplacement services for 12 months.

 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell77

RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(Item 6 on the Proxy Card)

The Supervisory Board has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016. PwC has acted as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2010 and acted as the independent registered public accounting firm of our predecessor before that. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The ratification of the selection of PwC is not required, but our Supervisory Board is submitting the selection to shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’s auditors. If our shareholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Supervisory Board and Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may recommend to the Supervisory Board a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm who will audit our accounts for the year ending December 31, 2016.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that you vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEE INFORMATION

Fees for professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories, were as follows:

Back to Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

   2015   2014 
   (in millions) 

Audit Fees

  $8.1    $8.7  

Audit-Related Fees

   0.6     0.7  

Tax Fees

   0.2     0.2  

All Other Fees

   —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $8.9    $9.6  

Audit fees consist of the aggregate fees and expenses billed or expected to be billed for professional services rendered by PwC for the audit of our consolidated financial statements, the review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs and for services that are normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years, including comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services and consents.

Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by PwC that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and are not reported as audit fees herein. This category includes fees related to: the performance of audits of benefit plans; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures relating to accounting records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and consultations as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by regulatory or standard setting bodies.

Tax fees consist of international tax compliance and corporate tax consulting.

The Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the approval of PwC’s services and related fees. Each year, all audit and audit-related services, tax services and other services for the upcoming audit are provided to the Audit Committee for approval. The services, which may be provided in the upcoming twelve-month period, are grouped into significant categories and provided to the Audit Committee substantially in the format shown above.

The Audit Committee is updated on the status of all services and related fees on a periodic basis or as matters warrant. In 2015 and 2014, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit, audit-related and tax services performed by PwC.

As set forth in the Audit Committee Report, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of these non-audit services is compatible with maintaining auditor independence and has determined that they are.

APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS ACCOUNTANTS N.V. AS OUR

AUDITOR FOR THE DUTCH STATUTORY ANNUAL ACCOUNTS FOR

THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016

(Item 7 on the Proxy Card)

The Supervisory Board has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. to serve as our auditor who will audit the Dutch Annual Accounts to be prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, as adopted by the European Union (IFRS), for the year ending December 31, 2016. Our Articles of Association provide that shareholder approval will be obtained for the selection.

Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions. They will also have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. as our auditor who will audit our Dutch Annual Accounts for the year ending December 31, 2016.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that you vote FOR the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. as our auditor for the Dutch Annual Accounts for the year ending December 31, 2016.

RATIFICATION AND APPROVAL OF DIVIDENDS IN RESPECT OF THE 2015 FISCAL YEAR

(Item 8 on the Proxy Card)

The Company has paid or declared an aggregate of $3.12 per share from its 2015 annual accounts. This includes interim dividends of $0.78 per share paid in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2015 and the $0.78 per share dividend declared for the first quarter 2016.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the dividend payments.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that shareholders vote FOR the proposal to ratify and approve the payment of dividends in respect of the 2015 fiscal year.

DISCUSSION OF DIVIDEND POLICY

Pursuant to the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, we provide shareholders with an opportunity at our Annual Meeting to discuss our dividend policy and any major changes in that policy.

Our dividend policy continues to be to pay a consistent quarterly dividend, with the goal of increasing the dividend over time.

LyondellBasell paid an aggregate of $1.4 billion in dividends in 2015, $1.4 billion in 2014 and $1.1 billion in 2013. The Company’s dividend payments have increased from $0.10 per share in the second quarter of 2011 when it began paying dividends to $0.78 per share in the second quarter 2015. The Supervisory Board believes that, given the Company’s strong capital and results of operation, it is appropriate to continue this dividend program.

Pursuant to our Articles of Association, the Management Board, with the approval of the Supervisory Board, may determine that an amount shall be reserved out of our annual profits for the payment of dividends. The portion of our annual profits that remains after the reservation is available for dividend payments as approved by shareholders. The determination to pay any dividends will be made after a review of the Company’s expected earnings, the economic environment, the financial position and prospects of the Company, and any other considerations deemed relevant by the Management Board with the approval of the Supervisory Board.

ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE APPROVING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(Item 9 on the Proxy Card)

Our Supervisory Board proposes that shareholders provide advisory (non-binding) approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. We recognize the interest our shareholders have in the compensation of our executives and we are providing this advisory proposal in recognition of that interest and as required by SEC rules. We currently conduct shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation annually and, therefore, the next vote will be in connection with our annual meeting in 2017.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” our named executive officer compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, and retain our named executive officers, who are critical to our success, and ensure alignment of those persons with shareholders. Our named executive officers are rewarded for their service to the Company, the achievement of performance goals and the realization of increased shareholder value. The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the compensation programs for our named executive officers to ensure the fulfillment of our compensation philosophy and goals.

Please read the “Executive Compensation,” section of this proxy statement beginning on page 27 for additional details about our named executive officer compensation program.

We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices

described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2016 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Supervisory Board. We value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary.

Advisory votes against the named executive officer compensation will not necessarily communicate to the Company, the Supervisory Board or the Compensation Committee the concerns that caused the negative votes. We would like to consider our shareholders’ concerns, if any, on these matters and therefore give shareholders the opportunity to communicate with us regarding their views on the Company’s executive compensation programs, among other matters, as described on page 4 of this proxy statement.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the executive officer compensation on an advisory basis.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that shareholders vote FOR the resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers on an advisory basis.

APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD TO REPURCHASE UP TO 10% OF OUR OUTSTANDING SHARES UNTIL NOVEMBER 11, 2017

(Item 10 on the Proxy Card)

Under Dutch law and our Articles of Association shareholder approval is necessary to authorize our Management Board to repurchase shares. At the annual meeting in May 2015, shareholders authorized repurchases of up to 10% of our shares. As of March 3, 2016, we have repurchased an aggregate of 42.2 million shares pursuant to this authorization.

Adoption of the current proposal will give us the flexibility to continue to repurchase shares if we believe it is an appropriate use of our excess cash.

The number of shares repurchased, if any, and the timing and manner of any repurchases will be determined by the Management Board, with the prior approval of the Supervisory Board, if it is in the best interest of the Company in light of prevailing market conditions, our available resources and other factors that cannot now be predicted. Under Dutch law, the number of shares held by us, or our subsidiaries, may generally never exceed 50% of the total number of our issued and outstanding shares.

In order to provide us with sufficient flexibility, the Management Board proposes that shareholders grant authority for the repurchase of up to 10% of our shares (or, based on the number of shares currently outstanding, approximately 43 million shares) on the open market, through privately negotiated repurchases, in self-tender offers, or through accelerated repurchase arrangements, at prices ranging up to 110% of the market price at the time of the transaction (or, in the case of an accelerated repurchase arrangement, 110% of the market price over the term of the arrangement). If approved, the authority would extend for 18 months from the date of the Annual Meeting, or until November 11, 2017.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to adopt the share repurchase proposal.

Our Management Board and Supervisory Board recommend that you vote FOR the proposal to grant authority to the Management Board to repurchase up to 10% of our issued share capital until November 11, 2017.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 20152023 about the number of shares to be issued upon vesting or exercise of equity awards and the number of shares remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

 

Plan Category

  Number of
Securities

to be Issued
Upon
Exercise of

Outstanding
Options,

Warrants
and
Rights(2)
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and
Rights(3)
   Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans(4)
  Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights(2)(3)
 Weighted-Average Exercise
 Price of Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights(4)
 Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans(5)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

   1,968,114    $73.15     9,398,317   5,723,194                 $90.02  10,528,161

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

       $—              
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,968,114    $73.15     9,398,317  
TOTAL 5,723,194 $90.02  10,528,161

 

(1)Includes the LyondellBasell Industries 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “LTI”“LTIP”) and the LyondellBasell 2012 Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated (the “ESPP”).
(2)Includes 779,5222,643,693 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding stock options and 398,448 restricted stock units. As1,156,439 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding RSUs. Additionally, 962,418 PSUs were outstanding as of December 31, 2015, there were 395,072 PSUs outstanding.2023, including accrued dividend equivalents. The CompensationC&TD Committee of the Supervisory Board determines the actual number of shares the recipient receives at the end of a three-year performance period which may range from 0%0 to 200% of the target number of shares. Because two timesup to 200% of the target number of shares may ultimately be issued, we have included an aggregate of 790,1441,923,062 shares, the maximum possible payoutspayout under the PSUs, as the number that may be issued.
(3)Excludes purchase rights that accrue under the ESPP. Purchase rights under the ESPP are considered equity compensation for accounting purposes; however,purposes. However, the number of shares to be purchased is indeterminable until the time shares are actually issued, as automatic employee contributions may be terminated before the end of an offering period and, due to the pricing feature, the purchase price and corresponding number of shares to be purchased is unknown.
(3)(4)Includes only the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding stock options. Does not include the restricted stock unitsRSUs or PSUs, as those awards have no exercise price associated with them. Also excludes purchase rights under the ESPP for the reasons described in (2)note (3) above.
(4)(5)The shares remaining available as of December 31, 2023 include 8,006,6977,778,231 shares under the LTILTIP and 1,391,6232,749,930 shares under the ESPP.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell78
Back to Contents

CEO Pay Ratio

LOGOPursuant to SEC rules, we are required to provide the following information with respect to fiscal 2023:

LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

The annual total compensation of the global median employee of our company (other than Mr. Vanacker, our CEO), was $106,365;
The annual total compensation of Mr. Vanacker, our CEO, was $16,546,194; and
Based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of the global median employee is 156 to 1.

DELFTSEPLEIN 27EPer SEC rules, we identified a new global median employee on December 31, 2022 based on 2022 compensation and the employee population. The global median employee for fiscal year 2022 was identified by examining the 2022 total compensation for all regular full- and part-time employees who were actively employed by the Company on December 31, 2022 and students and interns who were hired for partial periods during 2022. For these employees, annual compensation was calculated using methodology and guidelines consistent with the approach used to determine our median employee for 2018 and 2019. 

3013 AA ROTTERDAM

To find the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our CEO), we considered all gross and net components of compensation (including short- and long-term incentives) received by each employee and documented in the year-end payroll records for 2022.
Compensation for full- and part-time employees hired during 2022 and still active as of December 31, 2022 was annualized. Compensation for all students and interns hired for partial periods during 2022 was not annualized.
Annual compensation for expatriate employees and employees involved in permanent cross-border transfers during 2022 was calculated using all relevant country payroll records. 

THE NETHERLANDSAlthough there was no change in the Company’s employee population or compensation arrangements in 2023 that would result in a significant change to the Company’s pay ratio disclosure, we have used a different median employee this year because the previously identified 2022 median employee left the Company during the year. In accordance with SEC rules, the newly selected global median employee is an employee with substantially similar 2022 compensation to the prior global median employee. After identifying this 2023 global median employee, we calculated 2023 total compensation for the selected employee using the same methodology used for our NEOs as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. 

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell79
Back to Contents

Pay Versus Performance

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

UseIn accordance with rules adopted by the InternetSEC pursuant to transmitthe Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and non-PEO NEOs and Company performance for fiscal years listed below. The C&TD Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the fiscal years shown.

  Summary
Compen-
sation Table
 Compen-
sation
 Summary
Compen-
sation Table
 Compen-
sation
 Summary
Compen-
sation Table
 Compen-
sation
 Average
Summary
Compen-
sation Table
 Average
Compen-
sation
 Value of Initial
Fixed $100
Investment
Based On:(3)
    
Year Total for
Bhavesh
Patel(1)
($)
 Actually paid
to Bhavesh
Patel(1)(2)
($)
 Total for
Kenneth
Lane(1)
($)
 Actually Paid
to Kenneth
Lane(1)(2)
($)
 Total for
Peter
Vanacker(1)
($)
 Actually Paid
to Peter
Vanacker(1)(2)
($)
 Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs(1)
($)
 Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs(1)(2)
($)
 TSR
($)
 Peer
Group
TSR
($)
 Net
Income
($MM)
 EBITDA(4)
($MM)
2023     16,546,194 21,206,198 5,168,076 7,754,168 128.90 146.45 2,121 4,509
2022   8,798,076 9,046,842 17,018,989 14,863,867 5,818,984 6,400,521 106.81 131.89 3,889 6,301
2021 19,011,033 1,514,901     4,615,231 4,648,678 107.73 148.63 5,617 8,689
2020 15,570,513 16,833,907     3,288,167 3,043,798 102.57 118.05 1,427 3,285
(1)Bhavesh Patel was our PEO from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. Kenneth Lane (who served as Interim CEO) was our PEO from January 1, 2022 to May 22, 2022. Peter Vanacker is our PEO since May 23, 2022. The Non-PEO NEOs for whom the average compensation is presented in this table are: (a) for 2023: Michael McMurray, Kenneth Lane, Torkel Rhenman, and Jim Guilfoyle; (b) for 2022: Michael McMurray, Torkel Rhenman, Jeffrey Kaplan, and Jim Guilfoyle; (c) for 2021: Michael McMurray, Kenneth Lane, Torkel Rhenman, and Jim Guilfoyle; and (d) for 2020: Michael McMurray, Kenneth Lane, Torkel Rhenman, Jeffrey Kaplan, and Daniel Coombs.
(2)The amounts shown as Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized or received by the Company’s NEOs. Deductions from, and additions to, 2023 total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table to calculate Compensation Actually Paid consist of:
(3)The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the S&P 500 Chemicals Index, which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested, for the period starting December 31, 2019 through the end of the listed year, in the Company and in the S&P 500 Chemicals Index, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
(4)We determined EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non  PEO NEOs in 2023. More information on EBITDA can be found in Appendix A to this proxy statement. We may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years.

(1)Bhavesh Patel was our PEO from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. Kenneth Lane (who served as Interim CEO) was our PEO from January 1, 2022 to May 22, 2022. Peter Vanacker is our PEO since May 23, 2022. The Non-PEO NEOs for whom the average compensation is presented in this table are:
(a)for 2023: Michael McMurray, Kenneth Lane, Torkel Rhenman, and Jim Guilfoyle;
(b)for 2022: Michael McMurray, Torkel Rhenman, Jeffrey Kaplan, and Jim Guilfoyle;
(c)for 2021: Michael McMurray, Kenneth Lane, Torkel Rhenman, and Jim Guilfoyle; and
(d)for 2020: Michael McMurray, Kenneth Lane, Torkel Rhenman, Jeffrey Kaplan, and Daniel Coombs.

(2)The amounts shown as Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized or received by the Company’s NEOs. Deductions from, and additions to, 2023 total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table to calculate Compensation Actually Paid consist of:

  Peter
Vanacker
($)
  Average
Non-PEO NEOs
($)
Total Compensation from Summary Compensation Table  16,546,194   5,168,076
Adjustments for Pension       
Adjustment for Summary Compensation Table Pension  (16,479)   (26,988)
Amount added for current year service cost  12,475   15,953
Amount added for prior service cost impacting current year     
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS FOR PENSION  (4,004)   (11,035)
        
Adjustments for Equity Awards       
Adjustment for grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table  (11,642,449)   (2,899,160)
Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year  12,191,177   3,497,130
Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years  3,902,254   1,475,602
Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in current year     
Difference in fair values between prior year  end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years  213,026   523,555
Forfeitures during current year equal to prior year-end fair value     
Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in the total compensation     
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS FOR EQUITY AWARDS  4,664,008   2,597,127
Compensation Actually Paid (as calculated)  21,206,198   7,754,168

(3)The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the S&P 500 Chemicals Index, which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested, for the period starting December 31, 2019 through the end of the listed year, in the Company and in the S&P 500 Chemicals Index, respectively. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
(4)We determined EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non  PEO NEOs in 2023. More information on EBITDA can be found in Appendix A to this proxy statement. We may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell80
Back to Contents

Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years.

Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and the Company’s Net Income during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell81
Back to Contents

Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and EBITDA

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEOs, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our EBITDA during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

Relationship Between Company TSR and Peer Group TSR

The following chart compares our cumulative TSR over the four most recently completed fiscal years to that of the S&P 500 Chemicals Index over the same period.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell82
Back to Contents

Tabular List of Most Important Financial and Non-Financial Performance Measures

The following table presents the financial and non-financial performance measures that the Company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs for 2023 to Company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.

(in alphabetical order)
EBITDA
Free Cash Flow per Share
Safety
Sustainability
Value Enhancement Program Results

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell83
Back to Contents

Item 7
Authorization to Conduct Share Repurchases

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to grant authority to the Board to repurchase up to 10% of our issued share capital until November 24, 2025.

Under Dutch law and our Articles of Association, shareholder approval is necessary to authorize our Board to repurchase shares. At the annual general meeting of shareholders held on May 19, 2023, shareholders authorized the Board to repurchase up to 10% of our outstanding shares. As of April 1, 2024, we have repurchased an aggregate of approximately 1.0 million shares pursuant to this authorization.

Adoption of the current proposal will give us the flexibility to continue to repurchase shares if we believe it is an appropriate use of our liquidity. The number of shares repurchased, if any, and the timing and manner of any repurchases will be determined after taking into consideration prevailing market conditions, our available resources, and other factors that cannot now be predicted.

In order to provide us with sufficient flexibility, we propose that shareholders grant authority to the Board to repurchase up to 10% of our issued share capital as of the date of the Annual Meeting (or, based on the number of shares issued as of April 1, 2024, approximately 34,042,250 shares) on the open market, through privately negotiated repurchases, in self-tender offers, or through accelerated repurchase arrangements, at prices ranging from the nominal value of our shares up to 110% of the market price for our shares; provided that (i) for open market or privately negotiated repurchases, the market price shall be the price for our shares on the NYSE at the time of the transaction; (ii) for self-tender offers, the market price shall be the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) for our shares on the NYSE during a period, determined by the Board, of no less than one and no greater than five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the expiration of the tender offer; and (iii) for accelerated repurchase arrangements, the market price shall be the VWAP for our shares on the NYSE over the term of the arrangement. The VWAP for any number of trading days shall be calculated as the arithmetic average of the daily VWAP on those trading days.

If approved, the authority will extend for 18 months from the date of the Annual Meeting, or until November 24, 2025, and will replace the current repurchase authorization of the Board which was approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting on May 19, 2023. Any shares repurchased under this authority may be cancelled pursuant to the authorization to cancel shares requested under Item 8 below.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell84
Back to Contents

Item 8
Cancellation of Shares

The Board recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to cancel all or a portion of the shares in our treasury account.

Under Dutch law and our Articles of Association, shareholder approval is necessary to cancel ordinary shares that are held in treasury by us, or that may in the future be held in treasury by us as a result of share repurchases. Also under Dutch law, the number of shares held by us, or our subsidiaries, may not exceed 50% of our issued share capital at any time.

As of April 1, 2024, we held approximately 14,983,453 shares in our treasury account, primarily as the result of share repurchases. Treasury shares, if not cancelled, may be used for general corporate purposes, including for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

We are requesting that shareholders approve the cancellation of all or any portion of shares held in our treasury account or that may be repurchased pursuant to the authority requested under Item 7, above.

If this Item 8 is adopted, the cancellation of treasury shares may be executed in one or more tranches. The number of treasury shares that will be cancelled, if any, will be determined by the Board. If the Board determines it is appropriate to cancel our shares, we will follow the procedure set forth under Dutch law to cancel treasury shares from time to time. In accordance with Dutch statutory provisions, the cancellation of treasury shares will not be effective until two months after the resolution to cancel treasury shares has been filed with the Dutch Trade Register and announced in a Dutch national daily newspaper. Once the procedure is complete, the relevant treasury shares will be cancelled.

If this Item 8 is not approved, we will not cancel any treasury shares unless the general meeting of shareholders approves such cancellation at a later date.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell85
Back to Contents

Securities Ownership

Significant Shareholders

The table below shows information for shareholders known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our shares.

  Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and Address Number Percentage(1)
Certain affiliates of Access Industries, LLC(2)
40 West 57th Street, 28th Floor, New York, NY 10019
 65,285,504 20.1%
The Vanguard Group(3)
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
 31,223,387 9.6%
BlackRock, Inc.(4)
50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY 10001
 24,051,819 7.4%
Dodge & Cox(5)
555 California Street, 40th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104
 16,210,777 5.0%

(1)All percentages are based on 325,439,045 shares outstanding as of April 1, 2024.
(2)Information is based on a Form 4 filed with the SEC on February 29, 2024. Access Industries is a privately-held U.S. industrial group which controls directly or indirectly AI Investments Holdings LLC and certain other entities that are recordholders of our outstanding shares (collectively, the “Access Recordholders”). Len Blavatnik controls Access Industries and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by one or more of the Access Recordholders. Access Industries and each of its affiliated entities and the officers, partners, members, and managers thereof (including, without limitation, Mr. Blavatnik), other than the applicable Access Recordholder, disclaim beneficial ownership of any shares owned by the Access Recordholders. 
(3)Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 by The Vanguard Group reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2023. The shareholder reports sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, shared voting power with respect to 334,291 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 30,072,263 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,151,124 shares.
(4)Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2024 by BlackRock, Inc. reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2023, on behalf of its direct and indirect subsidiaries including  BlackRock Life Limited; BlackRock Advisors, LLC; Aperio Group, LLC; BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V.; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association; BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited; BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; iShares (DE) I Investmentaktiengesellschaft mit Teilgesellsc; BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd.; BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG; BlackRock Investment Management, LLC; BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG; BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A.; BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited; BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited; BlackRock Fund Advisors; BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited; BlackRock (Singapore) Limited; and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. The shareholder reports sole voting power with respect to 21,714,243 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 24,051,819 shares.
(5)Information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 by Dodge & Cox reporting beneficial ownership of the Company’s stock as of December 31, 2023. The shareholder reports sole voting power with respect to 15,177,327 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 16,210,777 shares.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell86
Back to Contents

Beneficial Ownership

Information relating to the beneficial ownership of our shares by each director, director nominee, and executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table is included below, as is information with respect to all of these individuals and all other executive officers of the Company, as a group. Shares are considered to be beneficially owned by a person if he or she, directly or indirectly, has sole or shared voting or investment power with respect to such shares. In addition, a person is deemed to beneficially own shares if that person has the right to acquire such shares within 60 days of April 1, 2024. The individuals set forth in the table below, individually and in the aggregate, beneficially own less than 1% of our outstanding shares as of April 1, 2024.

  Number of Stock Options
Exercisable Within
60 days
Name Shares RSUs(1) 
Peter Vanacker 6,453 10,640      99,839
Michael McMurray 58,116  169,881
Ken Lane(2) 61,496  
Jim Guilfoyle 49,471  121,597
Torkel Rhenman 53,339  103,563
Jacques Aigrain 21,967 3,556 
Lincoln Benet 7,743 1,860 
Robin Buchanan 10,416 1,860 
Tony Chase 4,816 1,860 
Bob Dudley 2,650 1,860 
Claire Farley 18,738 1,860 
Rita Griffin  1,865 
Michael Hanley 9,012 1,860 
Virginia Kamsky 1,801 1,860 
Bridget Karlin   
Albert Manifold 7,522 1,860 
ALL DIRECTORS, NOMINEES, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS A GROUP (22 PERSONS)(3) 331,121 30,941 561,175

(1)Represents RSUs (each equivalent to a share of LYB stock) that will vest within 60 days.
(2)Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024. Upon his departure, he forfeited any unvested long-term incentive awards.
(3)Includes shares beneficially owned by executive officers as of the date of this proxy statement who are not individually listed in this table. Mr. Lane resigned from his position effective March 15, 2024, and his ownership is excluded from this amount. Mr. Guilfoyle ceased to be deemed an executive officer as of February 22, 2024, and his ownership is excluded from this amount.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell87
Back to Contents

Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a written Related Party Transaction Approval Policy, which requires the disinterested members of the Audit Committee to review and approve certain transactions that we may enter into with related parties, including members of the Board, executive officers, and certain shareholders. The policy applies to any transaction:

in the ordinary course of business with an aggregate value of $25 million or more;
not in the ordinary course of business, regardless of value; or
with a value of $120,000 or more and in which an executive officer or non-executive director has a direct or indirect material interest.

Related party relationships are identified and disclosed on an ongoing basis, as well as through responses to annual questionnaires completed by all directors, director nominees, and executive officers.

The Audit Committee reviews all the relevant facts of each related party transaction, including the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction, and determines whether to approve the transaction by considering, among other factors, (i) whether the terms of the transaction are fair to the Company and on the same basis as those which could be obtained from non-related parties, (ii) the business reasons for the Company to enter into the transaction, (iii) whether the related party transaction would impair the independence of any independent Board member, and (iv) whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director or executive officer of the Company. No director votes on approval or, unless requested by the Audit Committee, participates in the discussion of a related party transaction in which he or she has an interest. The Audit Committee also conducts an annual review of all transactions with related parties, including those that do not meet the thresholds for related party transactions described above.

The following is a description of related party transactions in existence since the beginning of fiscal year 2023.

Access Industries

In 2010, we entered into certain agreements with affiliates of Access Industries, including a registration rights agreement, which obligates us to register and bear the costs for the resale of equity securities owned by Access Industries or its affiliates, and a nomination agreement. Pursuant to the nomination agreement, Access Industries has the right to nominate individuals for appointment to the Board if certain ownership thresholds are met. Access Industries currently owns more than 18% of our outstanding shares and has nominated Mr. Benet, Mr. Buchanan, and Ms. Kamsky pursuant to the nomination agreement. The Company entered into these agreements with Access Industries before it became publicly traded and the Related Party Transaction Approval Policy was adopted. Amendments to the nomination agreement are approved by disinterested directors.

Calpine Corporation

Calpine Corporation, the owner and operator of power plants across the United States and Canada, supplies power and steam to the Company’s Houston refinery and is owned by a group of investors, including a minority investment by Access Industries. The Audit Committee has approved, most recently in October 2020, the Company’s contracts with Calpine, which were determined to be on terms fair to the Company and more advantageous than those offered by other parties. In 2023, the Company purchased approximately $67.3 million of power, steam, and water from Calpine and sold approximately $18.8 million of excess gas and raw water to Calpine.

Other Transactions & Relationships

The Board was also made aware of, and considered the fairness of, certain transactions and relationships between the Company and other organizations where our directors and director nominees have relationships. These transactions and relationships were also considered in evaluating the independence of our directors and director nominees. In particular, Mr. Buchanan, Ms. Kamsky and Ms. Karlin each served as directors or advisors of companies with which LYB had commercial transactions in 2023. Each of these transactions was entered into on an arm’s-length basis in the ordinary course of business, and no director initiated or participated in negotiation of the relevant purchases or sales or had any material interest in, or received any compensation in connection with, these transactions. In each case, the payments made or received by LYB fell below the greater of $1 million or 2% of the other company’s annual gross revenue.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell88
Back to Contents

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common shares to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common shares (Forms 3, 4, and 5) with the SEC and the NYSE. Reporting persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all such forms that they file.

Based on a review of the reports filed, information of the Company, and written representations from reporting persons, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, all of our directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% shareholders timely filed all reports they were required to file under Section 16(a), except for seven reports by Mr. Chase that were not timely filed due to an administrative error, reporting sales and purchases of shares made by a third-party broker that were not subject to the discretion of the reporting person. A Form 4 reporting these transactions was filed in July 2023 after the missed filings were identified, and all short-swing profits realized by Mr. Chase from the relevant transactions have been voluntarily disgorged.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell89
Back to Contents

Questions and Answers about the Annual General Meeting

Who is soliciting my vote?

Our Board is soliciting your vote on voting matters submitted for approval at the Company’s 2024 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

Why are these matters being submitted for voting?

In accordance with Dutch law and the rules and regulations of the NYSE and the SEC, we are required to submit certain items for the approval of our shareholders. Several matters that are within the authority of a company’s board of directors under most U.S. state corporate laws require shareholder approval under Dutch law. Additionally, in accordance with Dutch corporate governance guidelines, we provide for the discussion at our Annual Meeting of certain topics that are not subject to a shareholder vote, including our governance practices and our dividend policy.

The discharge from liability of our directors, the adoption of our 2023 Dutch statutory annual accounts, the appointment of the auditor for our 2024 Dutch statutory annual accounts, the authorization to repurchase shares, and the cancellation of shares held in our treasury account are all items that we are required to submit to shareholders due to our incorporation in the Netherlands.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote my shares?

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the voting items presented in this proxy statement.

Unless you give other instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Haveon your proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in hand whenfavor of each of the voting items in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

Who is entitled to vote?

You may vote your LYB shares at the Annual Meeting if you accessare the web siterecord owner of such shares as of the close of business on April 26, 2024 (the “Record Date”). You are entitled to one vote for each share of LYB common stock that you own. As of April 1, 2024, there were 325,439,045 shares of LYB common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

How many votes must be present to hold the meeting?

Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you held such shares as of the Record Date and (i) properly return a proxy by Internet, telephone, or mail or (ii) properly notify us of your intention to attend the Annual Meeting, attend the meeting, and vote in person. There are no quorum requirements under Dutch law and, as a result, we may hold our meeting regardless of the number of shares that are present in person or by proxy.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell90
Back to Contents

How many votes are needed to approve each of the voting items?

The number of votes required to approve the matters presented in this proxy statement varies by item:

Pursuant to the Dutch Civil Code and our Articles of Association, the nomination of a candidate to our Board (Item 1) is binding on shareholders unless 2/3 of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, representing more than 50% of the Company’s issued share capital (which for this purpose includes only our outstanding shares), vote against the nominee. This means that a nominee will be elected unless the votes against him or her constitute 2/3 of the votes cast and represent more than 50% of our issued share capital.
Under Dutch law, the cancellation of shares held in our treasury account (Item 8) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. If, however, less than 50% of the Company’s issued share capital (which for this purpose includes only our outstanding shares) is represented at the Annual Meeting, the proposal will require the affirmative vote of at least 2/3 of the votes cast.
Each other voting item set forth in this proxy statement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by shareholders in order to be approved.

How do I vote?

You can vote by proxy without attending the meeting or in person at the meeting. To vote by proxy, you must vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail. Instructions for each method of voting are included on the proxy card.

If you hold your LYB shares in a brokerage account (that is, you hold your shares in “street name”), your ability to vote by telephone or over the Internet depends on your broker’s voting process. Please follow the instructions to obtaindirections on your records and to create an electronic votingproxy card or voter instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy in advance. If you plan to vote in person at the Annual Meeting and you hold your LYB shares in street name, you must obtain a proxy from your broker and bring that proxy to the meeting.

Can I change my vote?

Yes. You can change or revoke your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You can do this by:

Entering a new vote by telephone or over the Internet prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 22, 2024;
Signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us by a method that allows us to receive the proxy prior to the Annual Meeting;
Sending us a written document revoking your earlier proxy; or
Attending the Annual Meeting and voting your shares in person (attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy previously given by you).

Who counts the votes?

We have hired Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. to count the votes represented by proxies and cast by ballot at the Annual Meeting.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell91
Back to Contents

Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy and do not attend the Annual Meeting?

If you do not provide a proxy or vote your shares in person, the shares held in your name will not be voted.

If you hold your shares in street name, your broker may be able to vote your shares for certain “routine” matters even if you do not provide the broker with voting instructions. We believe that, pursuant to NYSE rules, Item 3, Item 5, Item 7 and Item 8 are considered routine matters. Therefore, without instructions from you, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to Item 1, Item 2, Item 4, and Item 6. It is therefore important that you act to ensure your shares are voted.

What is a broker non-vote?

If a broker does not have discretion to vote shares held in street name on a particular voting item and does not receive instructions from the beneficial owner on how to vote those shares, the broker may return the proxy card without voting on that voting item. This is known as a broker non-vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote for any voting item properly introduced at the meeting.

What if I return my proxy but don’t vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy card?

If you return a signed proxy card without indicating your vote on all voting items listed, your shares will be voted FOR each of the voting items for which you did not vote.

How are votes counted?

For all voting items other than the election of nominees to our Board of Directors, you may vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN. For the voting item for the election of nominees (Item 1), you may vote FOR, AGAINST, or WITHHOLD with respect to each nominee. A vote to abstain or withhold does not count as a vote cast, and therefore will not have any effect on the outcome of any voting item to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

Could other matters be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

No. All matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting must be included as voting items in the agenda for the meeting as described in this proxy statement. We will provide shareholders with an opportunity to discuss our corporate governance, dividend policy, and executive compensation program. However, there will be no vote on any of these matters.

2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell92
Back to Contents

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting is open to all LYB shareholders who hold shares as of the close of business on April 26, 2024, the Record Date.

If you would like to reduceattend the costs incurredAnnual Meeting, you must inform us in writing of your intention to do so on or before May 17, 2024, one week prior to the date of the meeting. The notice may be emailed to CorporateSecretary@LyondellBasell.com. Additional information regarding the availability of and procedures for in person attendance at the Annual Meeting will be provided to shareholders who provide timely notice of intent to attend and proper evidence of their ownership of LYB shares as of the Record Date. Admittance of shareholders to the Annual Meeting will be governed by Dutch law.

If we determine that in-person attendance is not possible or advisable due to unanticipated circumstances at the companytime of the Annual Meeting, we will provide information regarding alternative access as soon as available.

What is the cost of this proxy solicitation?

The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. Our directors, officers, and employees may solicit proxies by mail, by email, by telephone, or in mailingperson for no additional compensation. In addition, we have retained Georgeson LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $15,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Why did my household receive a single set of proxy materials?

SEC rules permit us to deliver a single copy of our annual report and proxy statement to any household at which two or more shareholders reside, if we believe the shareholders are members of the same family.

If you prefer to receive your own copy of the proxy statement now or in future years, please request a duplicate set by phone at (800) 579-1639, through the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, or by email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If you hold your shares in street name, and you received more than one set of proxy materials at your address, you can consentmay need to receiving all futurecontact your broker or nominee directly if you wish to discontinue duplicate mailings to your household.

Why did I receive a “notice of internet availability of proxy statements,materials” but no proxy cardsmaterials?

We distribute our proxy materials to certain shareholders via the Internet using the “Notice and annual reports electronically via e-mailAccess” approach permitted by rules of the SEC. This approach conserves natural resources and reduces our distribution costs, while providing our shareholders with a timely and convenient method of accessing the materials and voting. On or about April 8, 2024, we mailed a “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials” to participating shareholders, containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet. To sign up forIn addition, we provided the notice and proxy materials by e-mail to certain shareholders who previously consented to electronic delivery please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or accessof proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E04227-P76133-Z67443                 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

  LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES N.V.

     
     
 The Management Board and Supervisory Board of Directors recommend you vote FOR all of the nominees:            
 
 1. To elect four supervisory directors: For Against Withhold         
  

 

1a.

 

 

Jacques Aigrain, Class III director, to serve until the annual general meeting in 2019

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

        
  

 

1b.

 

 

Lincoln Benet, Class III director, to serve until the annual general meeting in 2019

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

    For Against Abstain  
  

 

1c.

 

 

Nance K. Dicciani, Class III director, to serve until the annual general meeting in 2019

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

5.

  

 

Discharge From Liability of Members of The Supervisory Board

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
  

 

1d.

 

 

Bruce A. Smith, Class III director, to serve until the annual general meeting in 2019

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

6.

  

 

Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
 

 

2.

 

 

To elect three managing directors to serve a two-year term:

   

 

7.

  

 

Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. as our Auditor for the Dutch Annual Accounts

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
  

 

2a.

 

 

Thomas Aebischer

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

8.

  

 

Ratification and Approval of Dividends in Respect of the 2015 Fiscal Year

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
  

 

2b.

 

 

Dan Coombs

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

9.

  

 

Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote Approving Executive Compensation

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
  

 

2c.

 

 

James D. Guilfoyle

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

10.

  

 

Approval to Repurchase up to 10% of our Outstanding Shares

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

  
 

 

The Management Board and Supervisory Board of Directors recommend you vote FOR the following proposals:

 

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

        
 

 

3.

 

 

Adoption of Annual Accounts for 2015

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

      
 

 

4.

 

 

Discharge From Liability of Members of The Management Board

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

 

 

¨

      

materials.

 

   
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell93
Back to Contents

How can I request to receive my “notice of internet availability of proxy materials” by e-mail for future shareholder meetings?

You can request to receive proxy materials for future meetings by e-mail by following the electronic delivery enrollment instructions at www.proxyvote.com. If your shares are held in street name, please contact your bank or broker for information on electronic delivery options.

If you choose to access future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail with instructions containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to access proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until terminated.

What are deadlines for the 2025 shareholder meeting?

Our Articles of Association provide that a shareholder representing at least one percent of our issued share capital can submit an agenda item for consideration at the Company’s general meeting of shareholders. Any such request must be received at least 60 days prior to the date of the annual meeting.

Under SEC rules, if a shareholder wishes to include a proposal in our proxy materials for presentation at our 2025 annual general meeting, the proposal must be received at our offices at LyondellBasell Industries, 4th Floor, One Vine Street, London W1J 0AH, United Kingdom, Attention: Corporate Secretary or sent to CorporateSecretary@LyondellBasell.com, by December 9, 2024. All proposals must comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The deadline for providing notice of a solicitation of proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees pursuant to Rule 14a-19 for the Company’s 2025 annual meeting is March 25, 2025.

We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these or other applicable requirements, including requirements under Dutch law and our Articles of Association.

   
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell94
 
Back to Contents

Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This proxy statement makes reference to certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined in Regulation G of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We report our financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but believe that certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as EBITDA and EBITDA exclusive of identified items, provide useful supplemental information to investors regarding the underlying business trends and performance of the Company’s ongoing operations and are useful for period-over-period comparisons of such operations. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

EBITDA, as presented herein, may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure reported by other companies due to differences in the way the measure is calculated. We calculate EBITDA as income from continuing operations plus interest expense (net), provision for (benefit from) income taxes, and depreciation & amortization. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to profit or operating profit for any period as an indicator of our performance, or as an alternative to operating cash flows as a measure of our liquidity. We also present EBITDA, exclusive of identified items. Identified items include adjustments for lower of cost or market (“LCM”), impairments and refinery exit costs. Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory valuation methodology, which means that the most recently incurred costs are charged to cost of sales, and inventories are valued at the earliest acquisition costs. Fluctuation in the prices of crude oil, natural gas and correlated products from period to period may result in the recognition of charges to adjust the value of inventory to the lower of cost or market in periods of falling prices and the reversal of those charges in subsequent interim periods, within the same fiscal year as the charge, as market prices recover. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical costs. If it is determined that an asset or asset group’s undiscounted future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover the carrying amount, an impairment charge is recognized to write the asset down to its estimated fair value. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill is below its carrying amount. If it is determined that the carrying value of the reporting unit including goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized. We assess our equity investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to its estimated fair value. In April 2022 we announced our decision to cease operation of our Houston refinery. In connection with exiting the refinery business, we began to incur costs primarily consisting of accelerated lease amortization costs, personnel related costs, accretion of asset retirement obligations and depreciation of asset retirement costs.

Recurring annual EBITDA for the Value Enhancement Program is the year-end EBITDA run rate estimated based on 2017-2019 mid-cycle margins and modest inflation relative to a 2021 baseline. We believe recurring annual EBITDA is useful to investors because it represents a key measure used by management to assess progress towards our strategy of value creation.

   
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell95
 
Back to Contents

A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA, including and excluding identified items, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 is shown in the following table:

 Year Ended December 31,
(amounts in millions) 2020202120222023
Net income$1,4275,6173,8892,121
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax 2655
Income from continuing operations 1,4295,6233,8942,126
(Benefit from) Provision for income taxes (43)1,163882501
Depreciation and amortization(a) 1,3851,3931,2671,534
Interest expense, net 514510258348
EBITDA 3,2858,6896,3014,509
add: Identified items     
Lower of cost or market inventory valuation charges 16
Impairments(b) 58262469518
Refinery exit costs(c) 157195
EBITDA excluding identified items$3,8839,3136,5275,222

(a)Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of asset retirement costs of in connection with exiting the Refining business.
(b)The years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021 reflect non-cash impairment charges related to our Houston refinery. The year ended December 31, 2022 reflects a non-cash impairment charge related to the sale of our polypropylene manufacturing facility in Australia. The year ended December 31, 2023 reflects non-cash impairment charges of $518 million, which includes $192 million related to European PO joint venture assets in our Intermediates & Derivatives segment, recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, and a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $252 million in our Advanced Polymer Solutions segment, recognized in the first quarter of 2023.
(c)Refinery exit costs include accelerated lease amortization costs, personnel related costs, and accretion of asset retirement obligations.

A reconciliation of net income to recurring annual EBITDA for the Value Enhancement Program (“VEP”) is shown in the following table:

(amounts in millions)     Original
Target
2023(b)
Unlocked
Value
2023(c)
Current
Target
2025
Net income(a)$115300750
Provision for income taxes    2575185
Depreciation and amortization    102565
Interest expense, net     
Recurring annual EBITDA(a)$1504001,000

(a)Year-end run-rate based on 2017-2019 mid-cycle margins and modest inflation relative to 2021 baseline.
(b)In 2022, we launched the Value Enhancement Program initially targeting $150 million in recurring annual EBITDA by the end of 2023.
(c)In 2023, the program delivered a year-end run-rate of approximately $400 million of recurring annual EBITDA.

   
2024Proxy Statement      LyondellBasell
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date96


Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of

LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

Wednesday May 11, 2016, 11:00 a.m., local time

Sheraton Hotel, Schiphol Airport

Schiphol Blvd. 101

1118 BG Amsterdam

The Netherlands

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

Notice and Proxy Statement/Annual Report including 10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

E04228-P76133-Z67443

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 11, 2016

The undersigned hereby appoints Bhavesh (Bob) V. Patel, Thomas Aebischer and Jeffery A. Kaplan or any of them, as proxies, each with full power of substitution, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote all of the ordinary shares of LyondellBasell Industries N.V. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 11:00 a.m., local time, on Wednesday, May 11, 2016, at the Sheraton Hotel, Schiphol Airport, Schiphol Blvd. 101, 1118 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, as indicated on the reverse side of this proxy card with respect to the proposals set forth in the proxy statement and in their discretion upon any matter that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment of the meeting. This proxy is governed by Dutch law.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

IF YOU ARE NOT VOTING ON THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE, PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE.

 
Back to Contents

Back to Contents

Back to Contents